Improved prediction from a severity characterization of trauma (ascot) over trauma and injury severity score (triss): Results of an independent evaluation

H. Champion, W. Copes, W. Sacco, C. Frey, J. Holcroft, D. Hoyt, J. Weigelt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

TRISS calculated norms as an outcomes predictor has been used in trauma quality improvement programs since approximately 1986. Injury predictability and probabilities of survival with TRISS focus predominantly on motor vehicle crashes and have been limited due to poor calculations for penetrating injury and adjustment for age factors. In 1990, an additional scoring system was introduced, A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT), to potentially present a more accurate predictability scoring system. Utilizing the data from four Level I Trauma Centers from 1987 to 1989, a comparative analysis was conducted on the accuracy of scoring systems. The findings indicate that for blunt injured adults, ASCOT had a higher sensitivity than TRISS, and for penetrating adult injuries, ASCOT and TRISS sensitivities had an equally low accuracy. For pediatric patients, TRISS and ASCOT sensitivities were comparable. Overall, the ASCOT scoring system accounted for age differential and severity of injury differential more accurately in four categories, allowing for a more accurate calibration. The ASCOT model seemed better for predicting survival than the TRISS model in that it had a higher sensitivity and met the Hosmer-lemeshow criterion for calibration, whereas the TRISS did not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Trauma Nursing
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Injury Severity Score
Wounds and Injuries
Calibration
Survival
Trauma Centers
Age Factors
Motor Vehicles
Quality Improvement
Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency
  • Critical Care
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Improved prediction from a severity characterization of trauma (ascot) over trauma and injury severity score (triss) : Results of an independent evaluation. / Champion, H.; Copes, W.; Sacco, W.; Frey, C.; Holcroft, J.; Hoyt, D.; Weigelt, J.

In: Journal of Trauma Nursing, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.01.1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c574b55d047f4ef1a81772c132253e57,
title = "Improved prediction from a severity characterization of trauma (ascot) over trauma and injury severity score (triss): Results of an independent evaluation",
abstract = "TRISS calculated norms as an outcomes predictor has been used in trauma quality improvement programs since approximately 1986. Injury predictability and probabilities of survival with TRISS focus predominantly on motor vehicle crashes and have been limited due to poor calculations for penetrating injury and adjustment for age factors. In 1990, an additional scoring system was introduced, A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT), to potentially present a more accurate predictability scoring system. Utilizing the data from four Level I Trauma Centers from 1987 to 1989, a comparative analysis was conducted on the accuracy of scoring systems. The findings indicate that for blunt injured adults, ASCOT had a higher sensitivity than TRISS, and for penetrating adult injuries, ASCOT and TRISS sensitivities had an equally low accuracy. For pediatric patients, TRISS and ASCOT sensitivities were comparable. Overall, the ASCOT scoring system accounted for age differential and severity of injury differential more accurately in four categories, allowing for a more accurate calibration. The ASCOT model seemed better for predicting survival than the TRISS model in that it had a higher sensitivity and met the Hosmer-lemeshow criterion for calibration, whereas the TRISS did not.",
author = "H. Champion and W. Copes and W. Sacco and C. Frey and J. Holcroft and D. Hoyt and J. Weigelt",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00043860-199604000-00008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses",
issn = "1078-7496",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved prediction from a severity characterization of trauma (ascot) over trauma and injury severity score (triss)

T2 - Results of an independent evaluation

AU - Champion, H.

AU - Copes, W.

AU - Sacco, W.

AU - Frey, C.

AU - Holcroft, J.

AU - Hoyt, D.

AU - Weigelt, J.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - TRISS calculated norms as an outcomes predictor has been used in trauma quality improvement programs since approximately 1986. Injury predictability and probabilities of survival with TRISS focus predominantly on motor vehicle crashes and have been limited due to poor calculations for penetrating injury and adjustment for age factors. In 1990, an additional scoring system was introduced, A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT), to potentially present a more accurate predictability scoring system. Utilizing the data from four Level I Trauma Centers from 1987 to 1989, a comparative analysis was conducted on the accuracy of scoring systems. The findings indicate that for blunt injured adults, ASCOT had a higher sensitivity than TRISS, and for penetrating adult injuries, ASCOT and TRISS sensitivities had an equally low accuracy. For pediatric patients, TRISS and ASCOT sensitivities were comparable. Overall, the ASCOT scoring system accounted for age differential and severity of injury differential more accurately in four categories, allowing for a more accurate calibration. The ASCOT model seemed better for predicting survival than the TRISS model in that it had a higher sensitivity and met the Hosmer-lemeshow criterion for calibration, whereas the TRISS did not.

AB - TRISS calculated norms as an outcomes predictor has been used in trauma quality improvement programs since approximately 1986. Injury predictability and probabilities of survival with TRISS focus predominantly on motor vehicle crashes and have been limited due to poor calculations for penetrating injury and adjustment for age factors. In 1990, an additional scoring system was introduced, A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT), to potentially present a more accurate predictability scoring system. Utilizing the data from four Level I Trauma Centers from 1987 to 1989, a comparative analysis was conducted on the accuracy of scoring systems. The findings indicate that for blunt injured adults, ASCOT had a higher sensitivity than TRISS, and for penetrating adult injuries, ASCOT and TRISS sensitivities had an equally low accuracy. For pediatric patients, TRISS and ASCOT sensitivities were comparable. Overall, the ASCOT scoring system accounted for age differential and severity of injury differential more accurately in four categories, allowing for a more accurate calibration. The ASCOT model seemed better for predicting survival than the TRISS model in that it had a higher sensitivity and met the Hosmer-lemeshow criterion for calibration, whereas the TRISS did not.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026141195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026141195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00043860-199604000-00008

DO - 10.1097/00043860-199604000-00008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85026141195

VL - 3

JO - Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses

JF - Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses

SN - 1078-7496

IS - 2

ER -