Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study: Opportunities and challenges

Kathleen Belanger, Stephen Buka, Debra C. Cherry, Donald J. Dudley, Michael R. Elliott, Daniel E. Hale, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Jessica L. Illuzzi, Nigel Paneth, James M. Robbins, Elizabeth W. Triche, Michael B. Bracken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The National Children's Study (NCS) was established as a national probability sample of births to prospectively study children's health starting from in utero to age 21. The primary sampling unit was 105 study locations (typically a county). The secondary sampling unit was the geographic unit (segment), but this was subsequently perceived to be an inefficient strategy. Methods and Results: This paper proposes that second-stage sampling using prenatal care providers is an efficient and cost-effective method for deriving a national probability sample of births in the US. It offers a rationale for provider-based sampling and discusses a number of strategies for assembling a sampling frame of providers. Also presented are special challenges to provider-based sampling pregnancies, including optimising key sample parameters, retaining geographic diversity, determining the types of providers to include in the sample frame, recruiting women who do not receive prenatal care, and using community engagement to enrol women. There will also be substantial operational challenges to sampling provider groups. Conclusion: We argue that probability sampling is mandatory to capture the full variation in exposure and outcomes expected in a national cohort study, to provide valid and generalisable risk estimates, and to accurately estimate policy (such as screening) benefits from associations reported in the NCS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)20-26
Number of pages7
JournalPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Sampling Studies
Prenatal Care
Parturition
Cohort Studies
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pregnancy
Child Health

Keywords

  • epidemiology methods
  • multi-stage sampling
  • National Children's Study
  • probability sampling
  • sampling methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Belanger, K., Buka, S., Cherry, D. C., Dudley, D. J., Elliott, M. R., Hale, D. E., ... Bracken, M. B. (2013). Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study: Opportunities and challenges. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 27(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12005

Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study : Opportunities and challenges. / Belanger, Kathleen; Buka, Stephen; Cherry, Debra C.; Dudley, Donald J.; Elliott, Michael R.; Hale, Daniel E.; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva; Illuzzi, Jessica L.; Paneth, Nigel; Robbins, James M.; Triche, Elizabeth W.; Bracken, Michael B.

In: Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 20-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Belanger, K, Buka, S, Cherry, DC, Dudley, DJ, Elliott, MR, Hale, DE, Hertz-Picciotto, I, Illuzzi, JL, Paneth, N, Robbins, JM, Triche, EW & Bracken, MB 2013, 'Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study: Opportunities and challenges', Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12005
Belanger, Kathleen ; Buka, Stephen ; Cherry, Debra C. ; Dudley, Donald J. ; Elliott, Michael R. ; Hale, Daniel E. ; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva ; Illuzzi, Jessica L. ; Paneth, Nigel ; Robbins, James M. ; Triche, Elizabeth W. ; Bracken, Michael B. / Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study : Opportunities and challenges. In: Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2013 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 20-26.
@article{04bdce487ad748489e25107bf041be81,
title = "Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study: Opportunities and challenges",
abstract = "Background: The National Children's Study (NCS) was established as a national probability sample of births to prospectively study children's health starting from in utero to age 21. The primary sampling unit was 105 study locations (typically a county). The secondary sampling unit was the geographic unit (segment), but this was subsequently perceived to be an inefficient strategy. Methods and Results: This paper proposes that second-stage sampling using prenatal care providers is an efficient and cost-effective method for deriving a national probability sample of births in the US. It offers a rationale for provider-based sampling and discusses a number of strategies for assembling a sampling frame of providers. Also presented are special challenges to provider-based sampling pregnancies, including optimising key sample parameters, retaining geographic diversity, determining the types of providers to include in the sample frame, recruiting women who do not receive prenatal care, and using community engagement to enrol women. There will also be substantial operational challenges to sampling provider groups. Conclusion: We argue that probability sampling is mandatory to capture the full variation in exposure and outcomes expected in a national cohort study, to provide valid and generalisable risk estimates, and to accurately estimate policy (such as screening) benefits from associations reported in the NCS.",
keywords = "epidemiology methods, multi-stage sampling, National Children's Study, probability sampling, sampling methods",
author = "Kathleen Belanger and Stephen Buka and Cherry, {Debra C.} and Dudley, {Donald J.} and Elliott, {Michael R.} and Hale, {Daniel E.} and Irva Hertz-Picciotto and Illuzzi, {Jessica L.} and Nigel Paneth and Robbins, {James M.} and Triche, {Elizabeth W.} and Bracken, {Michael B.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ppe.12005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "20--26",
journal = "Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology",
issn = "0269-5022",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study

T2 - Opportunities and challenges

AU - Belanger, Kathleen

AU - Buka, Stephen

AU - Cherry, Debra C.

AU - Dudley, Donald J.

AU - Elliott, Michael R.

AU - Hale, Daniel E.

AU - Hertz-Picciotto, Irva

AU - Illuzzi, Jessica L.

AU - Paneth, Nigel

AU - Robbins, James M.

AU - Triche, Elizabeth W.

AU - Bracken, Michael B.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Background: The National Children's Study (NCS) was established as a national probability sample of births to prospectively study children's health starting from in utero to age 21. The primary sampling unit was 105 study locations (typically a county). The secondary sampling unit was the geographic unit (segment), but this was subsequently perceived to be an inefficient strategy. Methods and Results: This paper proposes that second-stage sampling using prenatal care providers is an efficient and cost-effective method for deriving a national probability sample of births in the US. It offers a rationale for provider-based sampling and discusses a number of strategies for assembling a sampling frame of providers. Also presented are special challenges to provider-based sampling pregnancies, including optimising key sample parameters, retaining geographic diversity, determining the types of providers to include in the sample frame, recruiting women who do not receive prenatal care, and using community engagement to enrol women. There will also be substantial operational challenges to sampling provider groups. Conclusion: We argue that probability sampling is mandatory to capture the full variation in exposure and outcomes expected in a national cohort study, to provide valid and generalisable risk estimates, and to accurately estimate policy (such as screening) benefits from associations reported in the NCS.

AB - Background: The National Children's Study (NCS) was established as a national probability sample of births to prospectively study children's health starting from in utero to age 21. The primary sampling unit was 105 study locations (typically a county). The secondary sampling unit was the geographic unit (segment), but this was subsequently perceived to be an inefficient strategy. Methods and Results: This paper proposes that second-stage sampling using prenatal care providers is an efficient and cost-effective method for deriving a national probability sample of births in the US. It offers a rationale for provider-based sampling and discusses a number of strategies for assembling a sampling frame of providers. Also presented are special challenges to provider-based sampling pregnancies, including optimising key sample parameters, retaining geographic diversity, determining the types of providers to include in the sample frame, recruiting women who do not receive prenatal care, and using community engagement to enrol women. There will also be substantial operational challenges to sampling provider groups. Conclusion: We argue that probability sampling is mandatory to capture the full variation in exposure and outcomes expected in a national cohort study, to provide valid and generalisable risk estimates, and to accurately estimate policy (such as screening) benefits from associations reported in the NCS.

KW - epidemiology methods

KW - multi-stage sampling

KW - National Children's Study

KW - probability sampling

KW - sampling methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870890603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870890603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ppe.12005

DO - 10.1111/ppe.12005

M3 - Article

C2 - 23215706

AN - SCOPUS:84870890603

VL - 27

SP - 20

EP - 26

JO - Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

JF - Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

SN - 0269-5022

IS - 1

ER -