Impact of the cornea donor study on acceptance of corneas from older donors

Alan Sugar, Monty M. Montoya, Roy Beck, John W. Cowden, Mariya Dontchev, Robin L. Gal, Craig Kollman, Jackie Malling, Mark J Mannis, Bradley Tennant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively whether the findings from the Cornea Donor Study (CDS) led to changes in the transplantation of corneas from older donors. Methods: Eye banks in United States provided complete data on donor age and placement (domestic or international) for 86,273 corneas from 1998 to 2009. The data were analyzed by 3 periods, preceding CDS (1998-1999), during CDS (2000-2007), and after publication of CDS 5-year results (2008-2009), and separately for corneas placed within versus outside the United States. Results: For corneal tissues transplanted in the United States, the percentage of donors who were 66 years or older increased from 19% before CDS to 21% during CDS and 25% after CDS (P < 0.001). Corresponding median (25th-75th percentile) donor ages were 53 (39-63), 54 (41-64), and 57 (46-66), respectively (P < 0.001). The opposite trend was observed for corneas distributed outside the United States, with the percentage of donors 66 years and older decreasing from 56% to 42% to 34%, respectively. Donor age trends over time varied by eye bank. Conclusions: There was a modest overall increase in the donor age of corneas transplanted in the United States from 1998 to 2009, but the retrospective nature of the study limits our ability to attribute this change to the CDS. The modest increases in the donor age of corneas transplanted is a positive finding, but wider acceptance of older corneal donor tissue should be encouraged based on the 5-year evidence generated by the CDS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1441-1445
Number of pages5
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2012


  • cornea transplantation
  • donor age
  • eye bank

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology


Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of the cornea donor study on acceptance of corneas from older donors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this