Impact of optimization algorithms on the intensity map in IMRT treatment planning

Mari Shimada, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Yuki Miyabe, Tokihiro Yamamoto, Teruki Teshima, Yuichiro Narita, Takashi Mizowaki, Yasushi Nagata, Masahiro Hiraoka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In inverse planning of IMRT, optimum intensity maps are generated using an optimization algorithm. In this paper, impacts of two different optimization algorithms on the intensity map in IMRT treatment planning were evaluated. These were from the steepest descent (SD) and simulated annealing (SA) methods. The following five patterns were compared: [1] SD with calculation time of 5 min; [2] SD with the terminal criterion based on cost function; [3] SA with calculation time of 5 min; [4] SA with the terminal criterion; and [5] SA with the terminal criterion using a smoothing filter. Differences of D(95%) for the planning target volume, V(70Gy) for the rectum wall and the bladder wall were up to 0.5, 1.8 and 3.2 %, respectively in all patterns. The dosimetric impact was negligible. In contrast, generated intensity maps were sensitive to the algorithms. Intensity maps generated by SA tended to have much fluctuation due to numerical artifacts compared to those generated by SD. The difference in the profile was over 7 % between the algorithms. The smoothing filter decreased the fluctuation in intensity maps of SA. In conclusion, it is important to understand impacts of optimization algorithms on the intensity map and the dose distribution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-107
Number of pages11
JournalIgaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics
Volume26
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rectum
Artifacts
Urinary Bladder
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Impact of optimization algorithms on the intensity map in IMRT treatment planning. / Shimada, Mari; Nakamura, Mitsuhiro; Miyabe, Yuki; Yamamoto, Tokihiro; Teshima, Teruki; Narita, Yuichiro; Mizowaki, Takashi; Nagata, Yasushi; Hiraoka, Masahiro.

In: Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2006, p. 97-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shimada, Mari ; Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ; Miyabe, Yuki ; Yamamoto, Tokihiro ; Teshima, Teruki ; Narita, Yuichiro ; Mizowaki, Takashi ; Nagata, Yasushi ; Hiraoka, Masahiro. / Impact of optimization algorithms on the intensity map in IMRT treatment planning. In: Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics. 2006 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 97-107.
@article{5565ae4c7b2c4942a700d2934e355a0d,
title = "Impact of optimization algorithms on the intensity map in IMRT treatment planning",
abstract = "In inverse planning of IMRT, optimum intensity maps are generated using an optimization algorithm. In this paper, impacts of two different optimization algorithms on the intensity map in IMRT treatment planning were evaluated. These were from the steepest descent (SD) and simulated annealing (SA) methods. The following five patterns were compared: [1] SD with calculation time of 5 min; [2] SD with the terminal criterion based on cost function; [3] SA with calculation time of 5 min; [4] SA with the terminal criterion; and [5] SA with the terminal criterion using a smoothing filter. Differences of D(95{\%}) for the planning target volume, V(70Gy) for the rectum wall and the bladder wall were up to 0.5, 1.8 and 3.2 {\%}, respectively in all patterns. The dosimetric impact was negligible. In contrast, generated intensity maps were sensitive to the algorithms. Intensity maps generated by SA tended to have much fluctuation due to numerical artifacts compared to those generated by SD. The difference in the profile was over 7 {\%} between the algorithms. The smoothing filter decreased the fluctuation in intensity maps of SA. In conclusion, it is important to understand impacts of optimization algorithms on the intensity map and the dose distribution.",
author = "Mari Shimada and Mitsuhiro Nakamura and Yuki Miyabe and Tokihiro Yamamoto and Teruki Teshima and Yuichiro Narita and Takashi Mizowaki and Yasushi Nagata and Masahiro Hiraoka",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "97--107",
journal = "Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics",
issn = "1345-5354",
publisher = "Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of optimization algorithms on the intensity map in IMRT treatment planning

AU - Shimada, Mari

AU - Nakamura, Mitsuhiro

AU - Miyabe, Yuki

AU - Yamamoto, Tokihiro

AU - Teshima, Teruki

AU - Narita, Yuichiro

AU - Mizowaki, Takashi

AU - Nagata, Yasushi

AU - Hiraoka, Masahiro

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - In inverse planning of IMRT, optimum intensity maps are generated using an optimization algorithm. In this paper, impacts of two different optimization algorithms on the intensity map in IMRT treatment planning were evaluated. These were from the steepest descent (SD) and simulated annealing (SA) methods. The following five patterns were compared: [1] SD with calculation time of 5 min; [2] SD with the terminal criterion based on cost function; [3] SA with calculation time of 5 min; [4] SA with the terminal criterion; and [5] SA with the terminal criterion using a smoothing filter. Differences of D(95%) for the planning target volume, V(70Gy) for the rectum wall and the bladder wall were up to 0.5, 1.8 and 3.2 %, respectively in all patterns. The dosimetric impact was negligible. In contrast, generated intensity maps were sensitive to the algorithms. Intensity maps generated by SA tended to have much fluctuation due to numerical artifacts compared to those generated by SD. The difference in the profile was over 7 % between the algorithms. The smoothing filter decreased the fluctuation in intensity maps of SA. In conclusion, it is important to understand impacts of optimization algorithms on the intensity map and the dose distribution.

AB - In inverse planning of IMRT, optimum intensity maps are generated using an optimization algorithm. In this paper, impacts of two different optimization algorithms on the intensity map in IMRT treatment planning were evaluated. These were from the steepest descent (SD) and simulated annealing (SA) methods. The following five patterns were compared: [1] SD with calculation time of 5 min; [2] SD with the terminal criterion based on cost function; [3] SA with calculation time of 5 min; [4] SA with the terminal criterion; and [5] SA with the terminal criterion using a smoothing filter. Differences of D(95%) for the planning target volume, V(70Gy) for the rectum wall and the bladder wall were up to 0.5, 1.8 and 3.2 %, respectively in all patterns. The dosimetric impact was negligible. In contrast, generated intensity maps were sensitive to the algorithms. Intensity maps generated by SA tended to have much fluctuation due to numerical artifacts compared to those generated by SD. The difference in the profile was over 7 % between the algorithms. The smoothing filter decreased the fluctuation in intensity maps of SA. In conclusion, it is important to understand impacts of optimization algorithms on the intensity map and the dose distribution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982293223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982293223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17344641

AN - SCOPUS:84982293223

VL - 26

SP - 97

EP - 107

JO - Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics

JF - Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics

SN - 1345-5354

IS - 3

ER -