Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration

Paula H. Bednarek, Mitchell D Creinin, Matthew F. Reeves, Carrie Cwiak, Eve Espey, Jeffrey T. Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) provide highly effective, reversible, long-term contraception that is appropriate for many women after first-trimester uterine aspiration. However, the effects of immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration on rates of complications and IUD use are uncertain. METHODS: We performed a randomized noninferiority trial involving women undergoing uterine aspiration for induced or spontaneous abortion at 5 to 12 weeks of gestation who desired an IUD. Subjects were randomly assigned (in a 5:6 ratio) to IUD insertion immediately after the procedure or 2 to 6 weeks afterward (delayed insertion). The primary outcome was the rate of IUD expulsion 6 months after IUD insertion; an expulsion rate 8 percentage points higher in the immediate-insertion group was defined as inferior. RESULTS: Among 575 women who underwent randomization, an IUD was inserted in 100% (258 of 258) of the women in the immediate-insertion group and in 71.3% (226 of 317) of those in the delayed-insertion group (difference, 28.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 23.7 to 33.7). The 6-month expulsion risk was 5.0% (13 of 258 women) after immediate insertion and 2.7% (6 of 226) after delayed insertion (difference, 2.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.0 to 5.8), which was consistent with the predefined criterion for noninferiority. Six-month rates of IUD use were higher in the immediate-insertion group (92.3%, vs. 76.6% after delayed insertion; P<0.001). Adverse events were rare and did not differ significantly between groups. No pregnancies occurred in the immediate-insertion group; five occurred in the delayedinsertion group (P = 0.07), all in women who never received an IUD. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month rate of expulsion of an IUD after immediate insertion was higher than but not inferior to that after delayed insertion. Immediate insertion resulted in higher rates of IUD use at 6 months, without an increased risk of complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2208-2217
Number of pages10
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume364
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 9 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intrauterine Devices
Intrauterine Device Expulsion
Confidence Intervals
Pregnancy
Induced Abortion
Spontaneous Abortion
First Pregnancy Trimester
Random Allocation
Contraception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Bednarek, P. H., Creinin, M. D., Reeves, M. F., Cwiak, C., Espey, E., & Jensen, J. T. (2011). Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(23), 2208-2217. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1011600

Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration. / Bednarek, Paula H.; Creinin, Mitchell D; Reeves, Matthew F.; Cwiak, Carrie; Espey, Eve; Jensen, Jeffrey T.

In: New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 364, No. 23, 09.06.2011, p. 2208-2217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bednarek, PH, Creinin, MD, Reeves, MF, Cwiak, C, Espey, E & Jensen, JT 2011, 'Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration', New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 23, pp. 2208-2217. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1011600
Bednarek, Paula H. ; Creinin, Mitchell D ; Reeves, Matthew F. ; Cwiak, Carrie ; Espey, Eve ; Jensen, Jeffrey T. / Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration. In: New England Journal of Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 364, No. 23. pp. 2208-2217.
@article{d63371b4e0ef455aa7bc52aac9def273,
title = "Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) provide highly effective, reversible, long-term contraception that is appropriate for many women after first-trimester uterine aspiration. However, the effects of immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration on rates of complications and IUD use are uncertain. METHODS: We performed a randomized noninferiority trial involving women undergoing uterine aspiration for induced or spontaneous abortion at 5 to 12 weeks of gestation who desired an IUD. Subjects were randomly assigned (in a 5:6 ratio) to IUD insertion immediately after the procedure or 2 to 6 weeks afterward (delayed insertion). The primary outcome was the rate of IUD expulsion 6 months after IUD insertion; an expulsion rate 8 percentage points higher in the immediate-insertion group was defined as inferior. RESULTS: Among 575 women who underwent randomization, an IUD was inserted in 100{\%} (258 of 258) of the women in the immediate-insertion group and in 71.3{\%} (226 of 317) of those in the delayed-insertion group (difference, 28.7 percentage points; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 23.7 to 33.7). The 6-month expulsion risk was 5.0{\%} (13 of 258 women) after immediate insertion and 2.7{\%} (6 of 226) after delayed insertion (difference, 2.3 percentage points; 95{\%} CI, -1.0 to 5.8), which was consistent with the predefined criterion for noninferiority. Six-month rates of IUD use were higher in the immediate-insertion group (92.3{\%}, vs. 76.6{\%} after delayed insertion; P<0.001). Adverse events were rare and did not differ significantly between groups. No pregnancies occurred in the immediate-insertion group; five occurred in the delayedinsertion group (P = 0.07), all in women who never received an IUD. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month rate of expulsion of an IUD after immediate insertion was higher than but not inferior to that after delayed insertion. Immediate insertion resulted in higher rates of IUD use at 6 months, without an increased risk of complications.",
author = "Bednarek, {Paula H.} and Creinin, {Mitchell D} and Reeves, {Matthew F.} and Carrie Cwiak and Eve Espey and Jensen, {Jeffrey T.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1056/NEJMoa1011600",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "364",
pages = "2208--2217",
journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0028-4793",
publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration

AU - Bednarek, Paula H.

AU - Creinin, Mitchell D

AU - Reeves, Matthew F.

AU - Cwiak, Carrie

AU - Espey, Eve

AU - Jensen, Jeffrey T.

PY - 2011/6/9

Y1 - 2011/6/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) provide highly effective, reversible, long-term contraception that is appropriate for many women after first-trimester uterine aspiration. However, the effects of immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration on rates of complications and IUD use are uncertain. METHODS: We performed a randomized noninferiority trial involving women undergoing uterine aspiration for induced or spontaneous abortion at 5 to 12 weeks of gestation who desired an IUD. Subjects were randomly assigned (in a 5:6 ratio) to IUD insertion immediately after the procedure or 2 to 6 weeks afterward (delayed insertion). The primary outcome was the rate of IUD expulsion 6 months after IUD insertion; an expulsion rate 8 percentage points higher in the immediate-insertion group was defined as inferior. RESULTS: Among 575 women who underwent randomization, an IUD was inserted in 100% (258 of 258) of the women in the immediate-insertion group and in 71.3% (226 of 317) of those in the delayed-insertion group (difference, 28.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 23.7 to 33.7). The 6-month expulsion risk was 5.0% (13 of 258 women) after immediate insertion and 2.7% (6 of 226) after delayed insertion (difference, 2.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.0 to 5.8), which was consistent with the predefined criterion for noninferiority. Six-month rates of IUD use were higher in the immediate-insertion group (92.3%, vs. 76.6% after delayed insertion; P<0.001). Adverse events were rare and did not differ significantly between groups. No pregnancies occurred in the immediate-insertion group; five occurred in the delayedinsertion group (P = 0.07), all in women who never received an IUD. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month rate of expulsion of an IUD after immediate insertion was higher than but not inferior to that after delayed insertion. Immediate insertion resulted in higher rates of IUD use at 6 months, without an increased risk of complications.

AB - BACKGROUND: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) provide highly effective, reversible, long-term contraception that is appropriate for many women after first-trimester uterine aspiration. However, the effects of immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration on rates of complications and IUD use are uncertain. METHODS: We performed a randomized noninferiority trial involving women undergoing uterine aspiration for induced or spontaneous abortion at 5 to 12 weeks of gestation who desired an IUD. Subjects were randomly assigned (in a 5:6 ratio) to IUD insertion immediately after the procedure or 2 to 6 weeks afterward (delayed insertion). The primary outcome was the rate of IUD expulsion 6 months after IUD insertion; an expulsion rate 8 percentage points higher in the immediate-insertion group was defined as inferior. RESULTS: Among 575 women who underwent randomization, an IUD was inserted in 100% (258 of 258) of the women in the immediate-insertion group and in 71.3% (226 of 317) of those in the delayed-insertion group (difference, 28.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 23.7 to 33.7). The 6-month expulsion risk was 5.0% (13 of 258 women) after immediate insertion and 2.7% (6 of 226) after delayed insertion (difference, 2.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.0 to 5.8), which was consistent with the predefined criterion for noninferiority. Six-month rates of IUD use were higher in the immediate-insertion group (92.3%, vs. 76.6% after delayed insertion; P<0.001). Adverse events were rare and did not differ significantly between groups. No pregnancies occurred in the immediate-insertion group; five occurred in the delayedinsertion group (P = 0.07), all in women who never received an IUD. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month rate of expulsion of an IUD after immediate insertion was higher than but not inferior to that after delayed insertion. Immediate insertion resulted in higher rates of IUD use at 6 months, without an increased risk of complications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958183053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958183053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1011600

DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1011600

M3 - Article

VL - 364

SP - 2208

EP - 2217

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

SN - 0028-4793

IS - 23

ER -