Imaging of acute head injury

John G. Murray, Alisa D. Gean, Scott J J Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews the neuroradiological evaluation of acute head injury with an emphasis on CT and MR imaging. Subacute and chronic head injury are not discussed. CT remains the modality of choice in the emergency setting, permitting rapid, comprehensive assessment of the great majority of head injuries. MR is most useful in patients in whom there is a discrepancy between clinical symptoms and CT findings. In addition, MR is the imaging modality of choice in the subacute and chronic setting. The superior contrast resolution of MR permits optimal evaluation of nonhemorrhagic (and hemorrhagic) white matter shearing injuries, and the lack of beam-hardening artifact permits a more thorough evaluation of the brain stem, posterior fossa, and cortical surface.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-205
Number of pages21
JournalSeminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Craniocerebral Trauma
Artifacts
Brain Stem
Emergencies
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Murray, J. G., Gean, A. D., & Evans, S. J. J. (1996). Imaging of acute head injury. Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI, 17(3), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2171(96)90035-9

Imaging of acute head injury. / Murray, John G.; Gean, Alisa D.; Evans, Scott J J.

In: Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1996, p. 185-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murray, JG, Gean, AD & Evans, SJJ 1996, 'Imaging of acute head injury', Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2171(96)90035-9
Murray, John G. ; Gean, Alisa D. ; Evans, Scott J J. / Imaging of acute head injury. In: Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI. 1996 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 185-205.
@article{7d48b1dd32ad42e8b7d346f50177c8df,
title = "Imaging of acute head injury",
abstract = "This article reviews the neuroradiological evaluation of acute head injury with an emphasis on CT and MR imaging. Subacute and chronic head injury are not discussed. CT remains the modality of choice in the emergency setting, permitting rapid, comprehensive assessment of the great majority of head injuries. MR is most useful in patients in whom there is a discrepancy between clinical symptoms and CT findings. In addition, MR is the imaging modality of choice in the subacute and chronic setting. The superior contrast resolution of MR permits optimal evaluation of nonhemorrhagic (and hemorrhagic) white matter shearing injuries, and the lack of beam-hardening artifact permits a more thorough evaluation of the brain stem, posterior fossa, and cortical surface.",
author = "Murray, {John G.} and Gean, {Alisa D.} and Evans, {Scott J J}",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1016/S0887-2171(96)90035-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "185--205",
journal = "Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI",
issn = "0887-2171",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging of acute head injury

AU - Murray, John G.

AU - Gean, Alisa D.

AU - Evans, Scott J J

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - This article reviews the neuroradiological evaluation of acute head injury with an emphasis on CT and MR imaging. Subacute and chronic head injury are not discussed. CT remains the modality of choice in the emergency setting, permitting rapid, comprehensive assessment of the great majority of head injuries. MR is most useful in patients in whom there is a discrepancy between clinical symptoms and CT findings. In addition, MR is the imaging modality of choice in the subacute and chronic setting. The superior contrast resolution of MR permits optimal evaluation of nonhemorrhagic (and hemorrhagic) white matter shearing injuries, and the lack of beam-hardening artifact permits a more thorough evaluation of the brain stem, posterior fossa, and cortical surface.

AB - This article reviews the neuroradiological evaluation of acute head injury with an emphasis on CT and MR imaging. Subacute and chronic head injury are not discussed. CT remains the modality of choice in the emergency setting, permitting rapid, comprehensive assessment of the great majority of head injuries. MR is most useful in patients in whom there is a discrepancy between clinical symptoms and CT findings. In addition, MR is the imaging modality of choice in the subacute and chronic setting. The superior contrast resolution of MR permits optimal evaluation of nonhemorrhagic (and hemorrhagic) white matter shearing injuries, and the lack of beam-hardening artifact permits a more thorough evaluation of the brain stem, posterior fossa, and cortical surface.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029920168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029920168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0887-2171(96)90035-9

DO - 10.1016/S0887-2171(96)90035-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 8797246

AN - SCOPUS:0029920168

VL - 17

SP - 185

EP - 205

JO - Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI

JF - Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI

SN - 0887-2171

IS - 3

ER -