Identifying speech acts from contextual and linguistic information

Leonard J Abbeduto, Laurie Furman, Betty Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted an experiment to examine the comprehension of interrogatives such as Could you make the pencil roll?, which can be intended as yes-no questions, as directives to perform an action, or as both. Clark (1979) has claimed that the comprehension of such sentences is governed by, among other things, the answer obviousness rule; that is, listeners are more likely to interpret such a sentence as a question if the question posed is non-obvious to the speaker. One purpose of the present experiment was to test Clark's claim. A second purpose was to begin identifying the types of contextual information listeners use in comprehending speech acts. The final purpose was to provide data relevant to the controversy about whether listeners evaluate the syntactically direct, literal meaning of a sentence in the course of arriving at a syntactically indirect interpretation. We found that listeners follow an answer obviousness rule, utilize their knowledge of objects and the actions they allow as context for sentence interpretation, and do sometimes evaluate the syntactically direct reading of a sentence before arriving at an indirect speech act.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-203
Number of pages15
JournalLanguage and Speech
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

speech act
Linguistics
listener
linguistics
Reading
comprehension
interpretation
experiment
Contextual
Speech Acts
Listeners
Syntax
Experiment

Keywords

  • comprehension
  • context
  • interrogatives
  • speech acts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Identifying speech acts from contextual and linguistic information. / Abbeduto, Leonard J; Furman, Laurie; Davies, Betty.

In: Language and Speech, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1989, p. 189-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abbeduto, Leonard J ; Furman, Laurie ; Davies, Betty. / Identifying speech acts from contextual and linguistic information. In: Language and Speech. 1989 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 189-203.
@article{dad188c982e24ecc9643ef5a05725a04,
title = "Identifying speech acts from contextual and linguistic information",
abstract = "We conducted an experiment to examine the comprehension of interrogatives such as Could you make the pencil roll?, which can be intended as yes-no questions, as directives to perform an action, or as both. Clark (1979) has claimed that the comprehension of such sentences is governed by, among other things, the answer obviousness rule; that is, listeners are more likely to interpret such a sentence as a question if the question posed is non-obvious to the speaker. One purpose of the present experiment was to test Clark's claim. A second purpose was to begin identifying the types of contextual information listeners use in comprehending speech acts. The final purpose was to provide data relevant to the controversy about whether listeners evaluate the syntactically direct, literal meaning of a sentence in the course of arriving at a syntactically indirect interpretation. We found that listeners follow an answer obviousness rule, utilize their knowledge of objects and the actions they allow as context for sentence interpretation, and do sometimes evaluate the syntactically direct reading of a sentence before arriving at an indirect speech act.",
keywords = "comprehension, context, interrogatives, speech acts",
author = "Abbeduto, {Leonard J} and Laurie Furman and Betty Davies",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1177/002383098903200301",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "189--203",
journal = "Language and Speech",
issn = "0023-8309",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying speech acts from contextual and linguistic information

AU - Abbeduto, Leonard J

AU - Furman, Laurie

AU - Davies, Betty

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - We conducted an experiment to examine the comprehension of interrogatives such as Could you make the pencil roll?, which can be intended as yes-no questions, as directives to perform an action, or as both. Clark (1979) has claimed that the comprehension of such sentences is governed by, among other things, the answer obviousness rule; that is, listeners are more likely to interpret such a sentence as a question if the question posed is non-obvious to the speaker. One purpose of the present experiment was to test Clark's claim. A second purpose was to begin identifying the types of contextual information listeners use in comprehending speech acts. The final purpose was to provide data relevant to the controversy about whether listeners evaluate the syntactically direct, literal meaning of a sentence in the course of arriving at a syntactically indirect interpretation. We found that listeners follow an answer obviousness rule, utilize their knowledge of objects and the actions they allow as context for sentence interpretation, and do sometimes evaluate the syntactically direct reading of a sentence before arriving at an indirect speech act.

AB - We conducted an experiment to examine the comprehension of interrogatives such as Could you make the pencil roll?, which can be intended as yes-no questions, as directives to perform an action, or as both. Clark (1979) has claimed that the comprehension of such sentences is governed by, among other things, the answer obviousness rule; that is, listeners are more likely to interpret such a sentence as a question if the question posed is non-obvious to the speaker. One purpose of the present experiment was to test Clark's claim. A second purpose was to begin identifying the types of contextual information listeners use in comprehending speech acts. The final purpose was to provide data relevant to the controversy about whether listeners evaluate the syntactically direct, literal meaning of a sentence in the course of arriving at a syntactically indirect interpretation. We found that listeners follow an answer obviousness rule, utilize their knowledge of objects and the actions they allow as context for sentence interpretation, and do sometimes evaluate the syntactically direct reading of a sentence before arriving at an indirect speech act.

KW - comprehension

KW - context

KW - interrogatives

KW - speech acts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970257685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970257685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002383098903200301

DO - 10.1177/002383098903200301

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 189

EP - 203

JO - Language and Speech

JF - Language and Speech

SN - 0023-8309

IS - 3

ER -