Identifying armed respondents to domestic violence restraining orders and recovering their firearms

Process evaluation of an initiative in California

Garen J Wintemute, Shannon Frattaroli, Barbara E. Claire, Katherine A. Vittes, Daniel W. Webster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. We evaluated a law enforcement initiative to screen respondents to domestic violence restraining orders for firearm ownership or possession and recover their firearms. Methods. The initiative was implemented in San Mateo and Butte counties in California from 2007 through 2010. We used descriptive methods to evaluate the screening process and recovery effort in each county, relying on records for individual cases. Results. Screening relied on an archive of firearm transactions, court records, and petitioner interviews; no single source was adequate. Screening linked 525 respondents (17.7%) in San Mateo County to firearms; 405 firearms were recovered from 119 (22.7%) of them. In Butte County, 88 (31.1%) respondents were linked to firearms; 260 firearms were recovered from 45 (51.1%) of them. Nonrecovery occurred most often when orders were never served or respondents denied having firearms. There were no reports of serious violence or injury. Conclusions. Recovering firearms from persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders is possible. We have identified design and implementation changes that may improve the screening process and the yield from recovery efforts. Larger implementation trials are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Domestic Violence
Firearms
Surveys and Questionnaires
Law Enforcement
Ownership
Violence
Interviews
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Identifying armed respondents to domestic violence restraining orders and recovering their firearms : Process evaluation of an initiative in California. / Wintemute, Garen J; Frattaroli, Shannon; Claire, Barbara E.; Vittes, Katherine A.; Webster, Daniel W.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 104, No. 2, 02.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f472d061a5b42d09791e580a612051e,
title = "Identifying armed respondents to domestic violence restraining orders and recovering their firearms: Process evaluation of an initiative in California",
abstract = "Objectives. We evaluated a law enforcement initiative to screen respondents to domestic violence restraining orders for firearm ownership or possession and recover their firearms. Methods. The initiative was implemented in San Mateo and Butte counties in California from 2007 through 2010. We used descriptive methods to evaluate the screening process and recovery effort in each county, relying on records for individual cases. Results. Screening relied on an archive of firearm transactions, court records, and petitioner interviews; no single source was adequate. Screening linked 525 respondents (17.7{\%}) in San Mateo County to firearms; 405 firearms were recovered from 119 (22.7{\%}) of them. In Butte County, 88 (31.1{\%}) respondents were linked to firearms; 260 firearms were recovered from 45 (51.1{\%}) of them. Nonrecovery occurred most often when orders were never served or respondents denied having firearms. There were no reports of serious violence or injury. Conclusions. Recovering firearms from persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders is possible. We have identified design and implementation changes that may improve the screening process and the yield from recovery efforts. Larger implementation trials are needed.",
author = "Wintemute, {Garen J} and Shannon Frattaroli and Claire, {Barbara E.} and Vittes, {Katherine A.} and Webster, {Daniel W.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2013.301484",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying armed respondents to domestic violence restraining orders and recovering their firearms

T2 - Process evaluation of an initiative in California

AU - Wintemute, Garen J

AU - Frattaroli, Shannon

AU - Claire, Barbara E.

AU - Vittes, Katherine A.

AU - Webster, Daniel W.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Objectives. We evaluated a law enforcement initiative to screen respondents to domestic violence restraining orders for firearm ownership or possession and recover their firearms. Methods. The initiative was implemented in San Mateo and Butte counties in California from 2007 through 2010. We used descriptive methods to evaluate the screening process and recovery effort in each county, relying on records for individual cases. Results. Screening relied on an archive of firearm transactions, court records, and petitioner interviews; no single source was adequate. Screening linked 525 respondents (17.7%) in San Mateo County to firearms; 405 firearms were recovered from 119 (22.7%) of them. In Butte County, 88 (31.1%) respondents were linked to firearms; 260 firearms were recovered from 45 (51.1%) of them. Nonrecovery occurred most often when orders were never served or respondents denied having firearms. There were no reports of serious violence or injury. Conclusions. Recovering firearms from persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders is possible. We have identified design and implementation changes that may improve the screening process and the yield from recovery efforts. Larger implementation trials are needed.

AB - Objectives. We evaluated a law enforcement initiative to screen respondents to domestic violence restraining orders for firearm ownership or possession and recover their firearms. Methods. The initiative was implemented in San Mateo and Butte counties in California from 2007 through 2010. We used descriptive methods to evaluate the screening process and recovery effort in each county, relying on records for individual cases. Results. Screening relied on an archive of firearm transactions, court records, and petitioner interviews; no single source was adequate. Screening linked 525 respondents (17.7%) in San Mateo County to firearms; 405 firearms were recovered from 119 (22.7%) of them. In Butte County, 88 (31.1%) respondents were linked to firearms; 260 firearms were recovered from 45 (51.1%) of them. Nonrecovery occurred most often when orders were never served or respondents denied having firearms. There were no reports of serious violence or injury. Conclusions. Recovering firearms from persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders is possible. We have identified design and implementation changes that may improve the screening process and the yield from recovery efforts. Larger implementation trials are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893376504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893376504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301484

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301484

M3 - Article

VL - 104

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 2

ER -