ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM mapping of the AAST Emergency General Surgery disease severity grading systems: Conceptual approach, limitations, and recommendations for the future

Garth H Utter, Preston R. Miller, Nathan T. Mowery, Gail T. Tominaga, Oliver Gunter, Turner M. Osler, David J. Ciesla, Suresh K. Agarwal, Kenji Inaba, Michel B. Aboutanos, Carlos V R Brown, Steven E. Ross, Marie L. Crandall, Shahid Shafi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) recently established a grading system for uniform reporting of anatomic severity of several emergency general surgery (EGS) diseases. There are five grades of severity for each disease, ranging from I (lowest severity) to V (highest severity). However, the grading process requires manual chart review. We sought to evaluate whether International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CM) codes might allow estimation of AAST grades for EGS diseases. The Patient Assessment and Outcomes Committee of the AAST reviewed all available ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes relevant to 16 EGS diseases with available AAST grades. We then matched grades for each EGS disease with one or more ICD codes. We used the Official Coding Guidelines for ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM and the American Hospital Association's "Coding Clinic for ICD-9-CM" for coding guidance. The ICD codes did not allow for matching all five AAST grades of severity for each of the 16 diseases. With ICD-9-CM, six diseases mapped into four categories of severity (instead of five), another six diseases into three categories of severity, and four diseases into only two categories of severity. With ICD-10-CM, five diseases mapped into four categories of severity, seven diseases into three categories, and four diseases into two categories. Two diseases mapped into discontinuous categories of grades (two in ICD-9-CM and one in ICD-10-CM). Although resolution is limited, ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes might have some utility in roughly approximating the severity of the AAST grades in the absence of more precise information. These ICD mappings should be validated and refined before widespread use to characterize EGS disease severity. In the long-term, it may be desirable to develop alternatives to ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes for routine collection of disease severity characteristics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1059-1065
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume78
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 7 2015

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • Disease severity grading
  • Emergency general surgery
  • ICD-10-CM
  • ICD-9-CM

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM mapping of the AAST Emergency General Surgery disease severity grading systems: Conceptual approach, limitations, and recommendations for the future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Utter, G. H., Miller, P. R., Mowery, N. T., Tominaga, G. T., Gunter, O., Osler, T. M., Ciesla, D. J., Agarwal, S. K., Inaba, K., Aboutanos, M. B., Brown, C. V. R., Ross, S. E., Crandall, M. L., & Shafi, S. (2015). ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM mapping of the AAST Emergency General Surgery disease severity grading systems: Conceptual approach, limitations, and recommendations for the future. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 78(5), 1059-1065. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000608