"I didn't know what was wrong

" How people with undiagnosed depression recognize, name and explain their distress

Ronald M. Epstein, Paul R. Duberstein, Mitchell D. Feldman, Aaron B. Rochlen, Robert A Bell, Richard L Kravitz, Camille Cipri, Jennifer D. Becker, Patricia M. Bamonti, Debora A Paterniti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic and treatment delay in depression are due to physician and patient factors. Patients vary in awareness of their depressive symptoms and ability to bring depression-related concerns to medical attention. OBJECTIVE: To inform interventions to improve recognition and management of depression in primary care by understanding patients' inner experiences prior to and during the process of seeking treatment. DESIGN: Focus groups, analyzed qualitatively. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and sixteen adults (79% response) with personal or vicarious history of depression in Rochester NY, Austin TX and Sacramento CA. Neighborhood recruitment strategies achieved sociodemographic diversity. APPROACH: Open-ended questions developed by a multidisciplinary team and refined in three pilot focus groups explored participants' "lived experiences" of depression, depression-related beliefs, influences of significant others, and facilitators and barriers to care-seeking. Then, 12 focus groups stratified by gender and income were conducted, audio-recorded, and analyzed qualitatively using coding/editing methods. MAIN RESULTS: Participants described three stages leading to engaging in care for depression - "knowing" (recognizing that something was wrong), "naming" (finding words to describe their distress) and "explaining" (seeking meaningful attributions). "Knowing" is influenced by patient personality and social attitudes. "Naming" is affected by incongruity between the personal experience of depression and its narrow clinical conceptualizations, colloquial use of the word depression, and stigma. "Explaining" is influenced by the media, socialization processes and social relations. Physical/medical explanations can appear to facilitate care-seeking, but may also have detrimental consequences. Other explanations (characterological, situational) are common, and can serve to either enhance or reduce blame of oneself or others. CONCLUSIONS: To improve recognition of depression, primary care physicians should be alert to patients' ill-defined distress and heterogeneous symptoms, help patients name their distress, and promote explanations that comport with patients' lived experience, reduce blame and stigma, and facilitate care-seeking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)954-961
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Names
Depression
Focus Groups
Aptitude
Socialization
Primary Care Physicians
Personality
Primary Health Care
Physicians
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • depression
  • diagnosis
  • interventions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

"I didn't know what was wrong : " How people with undiagnosed depression recognize, name and explain their distress. / Epstein, Ronald M.; Duberstein, Paul R.; Feldman, Mitchell D.; Rochlen, Aaron B.; Bell, Robert A; Kravitz, Richard L; Cipri, Camille; Becker, Jennifer D.; Bamonti, Patricia M.; Paterniti, Debora A.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 9, 09.2010, p. 954-961.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Epstein, Ronald M. ; Duberstein, Paul R. ; Feldman, Mitchell D. ; Rochlen, Aaron B. ; Bell, Robert A ; Kravitz, Richard L ; Cipri, Camille ; Becker, Jennifer D. ; Bamonti, Patricia M. ; Paterniti, Debora A. / "I didn't know what was wrong : " How people with undiagnosed depression recognize, name and explain their distress. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 9. pp. 954-961.
@article{834bf6b8534742088639fae73ebd4bc4,
title = "{"}I didn't know what was wrong: {"} How people with undiagnosed depression recognize, name and explain their distress",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Diagnostic and treatment delay in depression are due to physician and patient factors. Patients vary in awareness of their depressive symptoms and ability to bring depression-related concerns to medical attention. OBJECTIVE: To inform interventions to improve recognition and management of depression in primary care by understanding patients' inner experiences prior to and during the process of seeking treatment. DESIGN: Focus groups, analyzed qualitatively. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and sixteen adults (79{\%} response) with personal or vicarious history of depression in Rochester NY, Austin TX and Sacramento CA. Neighborhood recruitment strategies achieved sociodemographic diversity. APPROACH: Open-ended questions developed by a multidisciplinary team and refined in three pilot focus groups explored participants' {"}lived experiences{"} of depression, depression-related beliefs, influences of significant others, and facilitators and barriers to care-seeking. Then, 12 focus groups stratified by gender and income were conducted, audio-recorded, and analyzed qualitatively using coding/editing methods. MAIN RESULTS: Participants described three stages leading to engaging in care for depression - {"}knowing{"} (recognizing that something was wrong), {"}naming{"} (finding words to describe their distress) and {"}explaining{"} (seeking meaningful attributions). {"}Knowing{"} is influenced by patient personality and social attitudes. {"}Naming{"} is affected by incongruity between the personal experience of depression and its narrow clinical conceptualizations, colloquial use of the word depression, and stigma. {"}Explaining{"} is influenced by the media, socialization processes and social relations. Physical/medical explanations can appear to facilitate care-seeking, but may also have detrimental consequences. Other explanations (characterological, situational) are common, and can serve to either enhance or reduce blame of oneself or others. CONCLUSIONS: To improve recognition of depression, primary care physicians should be alert to patients' ill-defined distress and heterogeneous symptoms, help patients name their distress, and promote explanations that comport with patients' lived experience, reduce blame and stigma, and facilitate care-seeking.",
keywords = "depression, diagnosis, interventions",
author = "Epstein, {Ronald M.} and Duberstein, {Paul R.} and Feldman, {Mitchell D.} and Rochlen, {Aaron B.} and Bell, {Robert A} and Kravitz, {Richard L} and Camille Cipri and Becker, {Jennifer D.} and Bamonti, {Patricia M.} and Paterniti, {Debora A}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-010-1367-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "954--961",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "I didn't know what was wrong

T2 - " How people with undiagnosed depression recognize, name and explain their distress

AU - Epstein, Ronald M.

AU - Duberstein, Paul R.

AU - Feldman, Mitchell D.

AU - Rochlen, Aaron B.

AU - Bell, Robert A

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Cipri, Camille

AU - Becker, Jennifer D.

AU - Bamonti, Patricia M.

AU - Paterniti, Debora A

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: Diagnostic and treatment delay in depression are due to physician and patient factors. Patients vary in awareness of their depressive symptoms and ability to bring depression-related concerns to medical attention. OBJECTIVE: To inform interventions to improve recognition and management of depression in primary care by understanding patients' inner experiences prior to and during the process of seeking treatment. DESIGN: Focus groups, analyzed qualitatively. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and sixteen adults (79% response) with personal or vicarious history of depression in Rochester NY, Austin TX and Sacramento CA. Neighborhood recruitment strategies achieved sociodemographic diversity. APPROACH: Open-ended questions developed by a multidisciplinary team and refined in three pilot focus groups explored participants' "lived experiences" of depression, depression-related beliefs, influences of significant others, and facilitators and barriers to care-seeking. Then, 12 focus groups stratified by gender and income were conducted, audio-recorded, and analyzed qualitatively using coding/editing methods. MAIN RESULTS: Participants described three stages leading to engaging in care for depression - "knowing" (recognizing that something was wrong), "naming" (finding words to describe their distress) and "explaining" (seeking meaningful attributions). "Knowing" is influenced by patient personality and social attitudes. "Naming" is affected by incongruity between the personal experience of depression and its narrow clinical conceptualizations, colloquial use of the word depression, and stigma. "Explaining" is influenced by the media, socialization processes and social relations. Physical/medical explanations can appear to facilitate care-seeking, but may also have detrimental consequences. Other explanations (characterological, situational) are common, and can serve to either enhance or reduce blame of oneself or others. CONCLUSIONS: To improve recognition of depression, primary care physicians should be alert to patients' ill-defined distress and heterogeneous symptoms, help patients name their distress, and promote explanations that comport with patients' lived experience, reduce blame and stigma, and facilitate care-seeking.

AB - BACKGROUND: Diagnostic and treatment delay in depression are due to physician and patient factors. Patients vary in awareness of their depressive symptoms and ability to bring depression-related concerns to medical attention. OBJECTIVE: To inform interventions to improve recognition and management of depression in primary care by understanding patients' inner experiences prior to and during the process of seeking treatment. DESIGN: Focus groups, analyzed qualitatively. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and sixteen adults (79% response) with personal or vicarious history of depression in Rochester NY, Austin TX and Sacramento CA. Neighborhood recruitment strategies achieved sociodemographic diversity. APPROACH: Open-ended questions developed by a multidisciplinary team and refined in three pilot focus groups explored participants' "lived experiences" of depression, depression-related beliefs, influences of significant others, and facilitators and barriers to care-seeking. Then, 12 focus groups stratified by gender and income were conducted, audio-recorded, and analyzed qualitatively using coding/editing methods. MAIN RESULTS: Participants described three stages leading to engaging in care for depression - "knowing" (recognizing that something was wrong), "naming" (finding words to describe their distress) and "explaining" (seeking meaningful attributions). "Knowing" is influenced by patient personality and social attitudes. "Naming" is affected by incongruity between the personal experience of depression and its narrow clinical conceptualizations, colloquial use of the word depression, and stigma. "Explaining" is influenced by the media, socialization processes and social relations. Physical/medical explanations can appear to facilitate care-seeking, but may also have detrimental consequences. Other explanations (characterological, situational) are common, and can serve to either enhance or reduce blame of oneself or others. CONCLUSIONS: To improve recognition of depression, primary care physicians should be alert to patients' ill-defined distress and heterogeneous symptoms, help patients name their distress, and promote explanations that comport with patients' lived experience, reduce blame and stigma, and facilitate care-seeking.

KW - depression

KW - diagnosis

KW - interventions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956420556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956420556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-010-1367-0

DO - 10.1007/s11606-010-1367-0

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 954

EP - 961

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 9

ER -