Humeral shaft fractures

Andre R. Spiguel, Robert J. Steffner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Management of humeral shaft fractures has historically been largely conservative. A significant body of literature, dating back to the 1970s, has shown that functional bracing may achieve greater than 90 % union rates and acceptable functional outcomes. More recently, however, with the advent of new surgical techniques and implant options, less tolerance for acceptable deformity and functional deficits, and less patience with conservative management, many treating orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly likely to consider surgical intervention. This article reviews the current recommendations for treatment of humeral shaft fractures, including both nonoperative and operative intervention. It also discusses the current thinking and operative trends in humeral shaft fracture fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-183
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Humeral Fractures
Fracture Fixation
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Anatomy
  • Fracture
  • Functional bracing
  • Humeral shaft
  • Intramedullary nail
  • Musculoskeletal
  • Nonunion
  • Operative management
  • Plate fixation
  • Surgical approaches
  • Traumad

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Humeral shaft fractures. / Spiguel, Andre R.; Steffner, Robert J.

In: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 177-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Spiguel, Andre R. ; Steffner, Robert J. / Humeral shaft fractures. In: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 177-183.
@article{72e8e4de3a534dd6ab28522ee7bf2e3b,
title = "Humeral shaft fractures",
abstract = "Management of humeral shaft fractures has historically been largely conservative. A significant body of literature, dating back to the 1970s, has shown that functional bracing may achieve greater than 90 {\%} union rates and acceptable functional outcomes. More recently, however, with the advent of new surgical techniques and implant options, less tolerance for acceptable deformity and functional deficits, and less patience with conservative management, many treating orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly likely to consider surgical intervention. This article reviews the current recommendations for treatment of humeral shaft fractures, including both nonoperative and operative intervention. It also discusses the current thinking and operative trends in humeral shaft fracture fixation.",
keywords = "Anatomy, Fracture, Functional bracing, Humeral shaft, Intramedullary nail, Musculoskeletal, Nonunion, Operative management, Plate fixation, Surgical approaches, Traumad",
author = "Spiguel, {Andre R.} and Steffner, {Robert J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s12178-012-9125-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "177--183",
journal = "Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine",
issn = "1935-9748",
publisher = "Humana Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Humeral shaft fractures

AU - Spiguel, Andre R.

AU - Steffner, Robert J.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Management of humeral shaft fractures has historically been largely conservative. A significant body of literature, dating back to the 1970s, has shown that functional bracing may achieve greater than 90 % union rates and acceptable functional outcomes. More recently, however, with the advent of new surgical techniques and implant options, less tolerance for acceptable deformity and functional deficits, and less patience with conservative management, many treating orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly likely to consider surgical intervention. This article reviews the current recommendations for treatment of humeral shaft fractures, including both nonoperative and operative intervention. It also discusses the current thinking and operative trends in humeral shaft fracture fixation.

AB - Management of humeral shaft fractures has historically been largely conservative. A significant body of literature, dating back to the 1970s, has shown that functional bracing may achieve greater than 90 % union rates and acceptable functional outcomes. More recently, however, with the advent of new surgical techniques and implant options, less tolerance for acceptable deformity and functional deficits, and less patience with conservative management, many treating orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly likely to consider surgical intervention. This article reviews the current recommendations for treatment of humeral shaft fractures, including both nonoperative and operative intervention. It also discusses the current thinking and operative trends in humeral shaft fracture fixation.

KW - Anatomy

KW - Fracture

KW - Functional bracing

KW - Humeral shaft

KW - Intramedullary nail

KW - Musculoskeletal

KW - Nonunion

KW - Operative management

KW - Plate fixation

KW - Surgical approaches

KW - Traumad

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866345547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866345547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12178-012-9125-z

DO - 10.1007/s12178-012-9125-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 22566083

AN - SCOPUS:84866345547

VL - 5

SP - 177

EP - 183

JO - Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

JF - Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

SN - 1935-9748

IS - 3

ER -