Human Donor Milk or Formula: A Qualitative Study of Maternal Perspectives on Supplementation

Molly R. Rabinowitz, Laura Kair, Heather L. Sipsma, Carrie A. Phillipi, Ilse A. Larson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Breastfeeding is fundamental to maternal and child health and is the most cost-effective intervention to reduce child mortality. Pasteurized human donor milk (HDM) is increasingly provided for term newborns requiring temporary supplementation. Few studies examine maternal perspectives on supplementation of term newborns. Materials and Methods: We conducted semistructured in-person interviews with mothers of term newborns (n = 24) during postpartum hospitalization. Mothers were asked whether they had chosen or would choose to supplement with HDM versus infant formula, if medically indicated, and why. Data were gathered to saturation and analyzed inductively by consensus. Emerging semantic themes were compared between mothers who chose or would choose HDM and those who chose or would choose infant formula. Results: Most mothers had concerns about HDM, including uncertainty regarding screening and substances passed through HDM. Experiences with prior children influenced decision-making. Mothers who chose or would choose HDM (56%, n = 14) praised it as "natural," and some felt suspicious of infant formula as "synthetic." Mothers who chose or would choose infant formula (44%, n = 10) did not know enough about HDM to choose it, and many viewed infant formula as a short-term solution to supply concerns. Mothers unanimously mistrusted online milk purchasing sources, although the majority felt positively about using a friend or family member's milk. Conclusions: Counseling regarding term newborn supplementation should focus on HDM education, specifically on areas of greatest concern and uncertainty such as donor selection, screening, transmission of substances, and mother's milk supply. Research is needed to assess the long-term impact of attitudes and choices on breastfeeding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-203
Number of pages9
JournalBreastfeeding Medicine
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Human Milk
Mothers
Tissue Donors
Infant Formula
Newborn Infant
Donor Selection
Milk
Breast Feeding
Uncertainty
Child Mortality
Semantics
Postpartum Period
Counseling
Consensus
Decision Making
Hospitalization
Interviews
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • breastfeeding promotion
  • donor human milk
  • Human Milk Banking Association of America
  • infant formula
  • newborn supplementation
  • qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics
  • Health Policy
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternity and Midwifery

Cite this

Human Donor Milk or Formula : A Qualitative Study of Maternal Perspectives on Supplementation. / Rabinowitz, Molly R.; Kair, Laura; Sipsma, Heather L.; Phillipi, Carrie A.; Larson, Ilse A.

In: Breastfeeding Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.04.2018, p. 195-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rabinowitz, Molly R. ; Kair, Laura ; Sipsma, Heather L. ; Phillipi, Carrie A. ; Larson, Ilse A. / Human Donor Milk or Formula : A Qualitative Study of Maternal Perspectives on Supplementation. In: Breastfeeding Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 195-203.
@article{8bd416d805d945c699533bf3c986154c,
title = "Human Donor Milk or Formula: A Qualitative Study of Maternal Perspectives on Supplementation",
abstract = "Background: Breastfeeding is fundamental to maternal and child health and is the most cost-effective intervention to reduce child mortality. Pasteurized human donor milk (HDM) is increasingly provided for term newborns requiring temporary supplementation. Few studies examine maternal perspectives on supplementation of term newborns. Materials and Methods: We conducted semistructured in-person interviews with mothers of term newborns (n = 24) during postpartum hospitalization. Mothers were asked whether they had chosen or would choose to supplement with HDM versus infant formula, if medically indicated, and why. Data were gathered to saturation and analyzed inductively by consensus. Emerging semantic themes were compared between mothers who chose or would choose HDM and those who chose or would choose infant formula. Results: Most mothers had concerns about HDM, including uncertainty regarding screening and substances passed through HDM. Experiences with prior children influenced decision-making. Mothers who chose or would choose HDM (56{\%}, n = 14) praised it as {"}natural,{"} and some felt suspicious of infant formula as {"}synthetic.{"} Mothers who chose or would choose infant formula (44{\%}, n = 10) did not know enough about HDM to choose it, and many viewed infant formula as a short-term solution to supply concerns. Mothers unanimously mistrusted online milk purchasing sources, although the majority felt positively about using a friend or family member's milk. Conclusions: Counseling regarding term newborn supplementation should focus on HDM education, specifically on areas of greatest concern and uncertainty such as donor selection, screening, transmission of substances, and mother's milk supply. Research is needed to assess the long-term impact of attitudes and choices on breastfeeding.",
keywords = "breastfeeding promotion, donor human milk, Human Milk Banking Association of America, infant formula, newborn supplementation, qualitative research",
author = "Rabinowitz, {Molly R.} and Laura Kair and Sipsma, {Heather L.} and Phillipi, {Carrie A.} and Larson, {Ilse A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/bfm.2017.0114",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "195--203",
journal = "Breastfeeding Medicine",
issn = "1556-8253",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human Donor Milk or Formula

T2 - A Qualitative Study of Maternal Perspectives on Supplementation

AU - Rabinowitz, Molly R.

AU - Kair, Laura

AU - Sipsma, Heather L.

AU - Phillipi, Carrie A.

AU - Larson, Ilse A.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Background: Breastfeeding is fundamental to maternal and child health and is the most cost-effective intervention to reduce child mortality. Pasteurized human donor milk (HDM) is increasingly provided for term newborns requiring temporary supplementation. Few studies examine maternal perspectives on supplementation of term newborns. Materials and Methods: We conducted semistructured in-person interviews with mothers of term newborns (n = 24) during postpartum hospitalization. Mothers were asked whether they had chosen or would choose to supplement with HDM versus infant formula, if medically indicated, and why. Data were gathered to saturation and analyzed inductively by consensus. Emerging semantic themes were compared between mothers who chose or would choose HDM and those who chose or would choose infant formula. Results: Most mothers had concerns about HDM, including uncertainty regarding screening and substances passed through HDM. Experiences with prior children influenced decision-making. Mothers who chose or would choose HDM (56%, n = 14) praised it as "natural," and some felt suspicious of infant formula as "synthetic." Mothers who chose or would choose infant formula (44%, n = 10) did not know enough about HDM to choose it, and many viewed infant formula as a short-term solution to supply concerns. Mothers unanimously mistrusted online milk purchasing sources, although the majority felt positively about using a friend or family member's milk. Conclusions: Counseling regarding term newborn supplementation should focus on HDM education, specifically on areas of greatest concern and uncertainty such as donor selection, screening, transmission of substances, and mother's milk supply. Research is needed to assess the long-term impact of attitudes and choices on breastfeeding.

AB - Background: Breastfeeding is fundamental to maternal and child health and is the most cost-effective intervention to reduce child mortality. Pasteurized human donor milk (HDM) is increasingly provided for term newborns requiring temporary supplementation. Few studies examine maternal perspectives on supplementation of term newborns. Materials and Methods: We conducted semistructured in-person interviews with mothers of term newborns (n = 24) during postpartum hospitalization. Mothers were asked whether they had chosen or would choose to supplement with HDM versus infant formula, if medically indicated, and why. Data were gathered to saturation and analyzed inductively by consensus. Emerging semantic themes were compared between mothers who chose or would choose HDM and those who chose or would choose infant formula. Results: Most mothers had concerns about HDM, including uncertainty regarding screening and substances passed through HDM. Experiences with prior children influenced decision-making. Mothers who chose or would choose HDM (56%, n = 14) praised it as "natural," and some felt suspicious of infant formula as "synthetic." Mothers who chose or would choose infant formula (44%, n = 10) did not know enough about HDM to choose it, and many viewed infant formula as a short-term solution to supply concerns. Mothers unanimously mistrusted online milk purchasing sources, although the majority felt positively about using a friend or family member's milk. Conclusions: Counseling regarding term newborn supplementation should focus on HDM education, specifically on areas of greatest concern and uncertainty such as donor selection, screening, transmission of substances, and mother's milk supply. Research is needed to assess the long-term impact of attitudes and choices on breastfeeding.

KW - breastfeeding promotion

KW - donor human milk

KW - Human Milk Banking Association of America

KW - infant formula

KW - newborn supplementation

KW - qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045090850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045090850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/bfm.2017.0114

DO - 10.1089/bfm.2017.0114

M3 - Article

C2 - 29437491

AN - SCOPUS:85045090850

VL - 13

SP - 195

EP - 203

JO - Breastfeeding Medicine

JF - Breastfeeding Medicine

SN - 1556-8253

IS - 3

ER -