How specific is CRISPR/Cas9 really?

Henriette O'Geen, Abigail S. Yu, David Segal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The specificity of RNA-guided nucleases has gathered considerable interest as they become broadly applied to basic research and therapeutic development. Reports of the simple generation of animal models and genome engineering of cells raised questions about targeting precision. Conflicting early reports led the field to believe that CRISPR/Cas9 system was promiscuous, leading to a variety of strategies for improving specificity and increasingly sensitive methods to detect off-target events. However, other studies have suggested that CRISPR/Cas9 is a highly specific genome-editing tool. This review will focus on deciphering and interpreting these seemingly opposing claims.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-78
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Chemical Biology
Volume29
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
Genes
Cell Engineering
Ribonucleases
Animals
Animal Models
Genome
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry

Cite this

How specific is CRISPR/Cas9 really? / O'Geen, Henriette; Yu, Abigail S.; Segal, David.

In: Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, Vol. 29, 01.12.2015, p. 72-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Geen, Henriette ; Yu, Abigail S. ; Segal, David. / How specific is CRISPR/Cas9 really?. In: Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2015 ; Vol. 29. pp. 72-78.
@article{ab03cdc278e04f9ba06c375f3f761952,
title = "How specific is CRISPR/Cas9 really?",
abstract = "The specificity of RNA-guided nucleases has gathered considerable interest as they become broadly applied to basic research and therapeutic development. Reports of the simple generation of animal models and genome engineering of cells raised questions about targeting precision. Conflicting early reports led the field to believe that CRISPR/Cas9 system was promiscuous, leading to a variety of strategies for improving specificity and increasingly sensitive methods to detect off-target events. However, other studies have suggested that CRISPR/Cas9 is a highly specific genome-editing tool. This review will focus on deciphering and interpreting these seemingly opposing claims.",
author = "Henriette O'Geen and Yu, {Abigail S.} and David Segal",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.10.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "72--78",
journal = "Current Opinion in Chemical Biology",
issn = "1367-5931",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How specific is CRISPR/Cas9 really?

AU - O'Geen, Henriette

AU - Yu, Abigail S.

AU - Segal, David

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The specificity of RNA-guided nucleases has gathered considerable interest as they become broadly applied to basic research and therapeutic development. Reports of the simple generation of animal models and genome engineering of cells raised questions about targeting precision. Conflicting early reports led the field to believe that CRISPR/Cas9 system was promiscuous, leading to a variety of strategies for improving specificity and increasingly sensitive methods to detect off-target events. However, other studies have suggested that CRISPR/Cas9 is a highly specific genome-editing tool. This review will focus on deciphering and interpreting these seemingly opposing claims.

AB - The specificity of RNA-guided nucleases has gathered considerable interest as they become broadly applied to basic research and therapeutic development. Reports of the simple generation of animal models and genome engineering of cells raised questions about targeting precision. Conflicting early reports led the field to believe that CRISPR/Cas9 system was promiscuous, leading to a variety of strategies for improving specificity and increasingly sensitive methods to detect off-target events. However, other studies have suggested that CRISPR/Cas9 is a highly specific genome-editing tool. This review will focus on deciphering and interpreting these seemingly opposing claims.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945152253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945152253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.10.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 26517564

AN - SCOPUS:84945152253

VL - 29

SP - 72

EP - 78

JO - Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

JF - Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

SN - 1367-5931

ER -