How much time do low-income patients and primary care physicians actually spend discussing pain? a direct observation study

Stephen G Henry, Susan Eggly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We know little about how much time low-income patients and physicians spend discussing pain during primary care visits. Objective: To measure the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions at a primary care clinic serving mostly low-income black patients; to investigate variables associated with these discussions. Design: We measured the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions using video-recorded primary care visits; we used multiple regression to evaluate associations between discussions and patient self-report variables. Participants: A total of 133 patients presenting to a primary care clinic for any reason; 17 family medicine residents. Main Measures: Independent variables were pain severity, health status, physical function, chief complaint, and whether the patient and physician had met previously. Dependent variables were presence of pain-related discussions and percent of total visit time spent discussing pain. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of visits included pain-related discussions with a mean duration of 5.9 min (34% of total visit time). Increasing pain severity [OR 1.69, 95% CI (1.18, 2.41)] and pain-related chief complaints [OR 4.10, 95% CI (1.39, 12.12)] were positively associated with the probability of discussing pain. When patients discussed pain, they spent 4.5% more [95% CI (0.60, 8.37)] total visit time discussing pain for every one-point increase in pain severity. Better physical function was negatively associated with the probability of discussing pain [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.48, 0.86)], but positively associated with the percent of total visit time spent discussing pain [3% increase; 95% CI (0.32, 5.75)] for every one-point increase in physical function). Patients and physicians who had met previously spent 11% less [95% CI (-21.65, -0.55)] total visit time discussing pain. Pain severity was positively associated with time spent discussing pain only when patients and physicians had not met previously. Conclusions: Pain-related discussions comprise a substantial proportion of time during primary care visits. Future research should evaluate the relationship between time spent discussing pain and the quality of primary care pain management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)787-793
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume27
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Primary Care Physicians
Patient Care
Observation
Pain
Primary Health Care
Physicians
Quality of Health Care

Keywords

  • black patients
  • direct observation
  • pain
  • patient-physician communication
  • patient-physician relationship
  • primary care
  • time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

@article{f49e2552697f4b9a97893fb4c7909a28,
title = "How much time do low-income patients and primary care physicians actually spend discussing pain? a direct observation study",
abstract = "Background: We know little about how much time low-income patients and physicians spend discussing pain during primary care visits. Objective: To measure the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions at a primary care clinic serving mostly low-income black patients; to investigate variables associated with these discussions. Design: We measured the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions using video-recorded primary care visits; we used multiple regression to evaluate associations between discussions and patient self-report variables. Participants: A total of 133 patients presenting to a primary care clinic for any reason; 17 family medicine residents. Main Measures: Independent variables were pain severity, health status, physical function, chief complaint, and whether the patient and physician had met previously. Dependent variables were presence of pain-related discussions and percent of total visit time spent discussing pain. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of visits included pain-related discussions with a mean duration of 5.9 min (34{\%} of total visit time). Increasing pain severity [OR 1.69, 95{\%} CI (1.18, 2.41)] and pain-related chief complaints [OR 4.10, 95{\%} CI (1.39, 12.12)] were positively associated with the probability of discussing pain. When patients discussed pain, they spent 4.5{\%} more [95{\%} CI (0.60, 8.37)] total visit time discussing pain for every one-point increase in pain severity. Better physical function was negatively associated with the probability of discussing pain [OR 0.65, 95{\%} CI (0.48, 0.86)], but positively associated with the percent of total visit time spent discussing pain [3{\%} increase; 95{\%} CI (0.32, 5.75)] for every one-point increase in physical function). Patients and physicians who had met previously spent 11{\%} less [95{\%} CI (-21.65, -0.55)] total visit time discussing pain. Pain severity was positively associated with time spent discussing pain only when patients and physicians had not met previously. Conclusions: Pain-related discussions comprise a substantial proportion of time during primary care visits. Future research should evaluate the relationship between time spent discussing pain and the quality of primary care pain management.",
keywords = "black patients, direct observation, pain, patient-physician communication, patient-physician relationship, primary care, time",
author = "Henry, {Stephen G} and Susan Eggly",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-011-1960-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "787--793",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How much time do low-income patients and primary care physicians actually spend discussing pain? a direct observation study

AU - Henry, Stephen G

AU - Eggly, Susan

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Background: We know little about how much time low-income patients and physicians spend discussing pain during primary care visits. Objective: To measure the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions at a primary care clinic serving mostly low-income black patients; to investigate variables associated with these discussions. Design: We measured the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions using video-recorded primary care visits; we used multiple regression to evaluate associations between discussions and patient self-report variables. Participants: A total of 133 patients presenting to a primary care clinic for any reason; 17 family medicine residents. Main Measures: Independent variables were pain severity, health status, physical function, chief complaint, and whether the patient and physician had met previously. Dependent variables were presence of pain-related discussions and percent of total visit time spent discussing pain. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of visits included pain-related discussions with a mean duration of 5.9 min (34% of total visit time). Increasing pain severity [OR 1.69, 95% CI (1.18, 2.41)] and pain-related chief complaints [OR 4.10, 95% CI (1.39, 12.12)] were positively associated with the probability of discussing pain. When patients discussed pain, they spent 4.5% more [95% CI (0.60, 8.37)] total visit time discussing pain for every one-point increase in pain severity. Better physical function was negatively associated with the probability of discussing pain [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.48, 0.86)], but positively associated with the percent of total visit time spent discussing pain [3% increase; 95% CI (0.32, 5.75)] for every one-point increase in physical function). Patients and physicians who had met previously spent 11% less [95% CI (-21.65, -0.55)] total visit time discussing pain. Pain severity was positively associated with time spent discussing pain only when patients and physicians had not met previously. Conclusions: Pain-related discussions comprise a substantial proportion of time during primary care visits. Future research should evaluate the relationship between time spent discussing pain and the quality of primary care pain management.

AB - Background: We know little about how much time low-income patients and physicians spend discussing pain during primary care visits. Objective: To measure the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions at a primary care clinic serving mostly low-income black patients; to investigate variables associated with these discussions. Design: We measured the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions using video-recorded primary care visits; we used multiple regression to evaluate associations between discussions and patient self-report variables. Participants: A total of 133 patients presenting to a primary care clinic for any reason; 17 family medicine residents. Main Measures: Independent variables were pain severity, health status, physical function, chief complaint, and whether the patient and physician had met previously. Dependent variables were presence of pain-related discussions and percent of total visit time spent discussing pain. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of visits included pain-related discussions with a mean duration of 5.9 min (34% of total visit time). Increasing pain severity [OR 1.69, 95% CI (1.18, 2.41)] and pain-related chief complaints [OR 4.10, 95% CI (1.39, 12.12)] were positively associated with the probability of discussing pain. When patients discussed pain, they spent 4.5% more [95% CI (0.60, 8.37)] total visit time discussing pain for every one-point increase in pain severity. Better physical function was negatively associated with the probability of discussing pain [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.48, 0.86)], but positively associated with the percent of total visit time spent discussing pain [3% increase; 95% CI (0.32, 5.75)] for every one-point increase in physical function). Patients and physicians who had met previously spent 11% less [95% CI (-21.65, -0.55)] total visit time discussing pain. Pain severity was positively associated with time spent discussing pain only when patients and physicians had not met previously. Conclusions: Pain-related discussions comprise a substantial proportion of time during primary care visits. Future research should evaluate the relationship between time spent discussing pain and the quality of primary care pain management.

KW - black patients

KW - direct observation

KW - pain

KW - patient-physician communication

KW - patient-physician relationship

KW - primary care

KW - time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862643051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862643051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-011-1960-x

DO - 10.1007/s11606-011-1960-x

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 787

EP - 793

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 7

ER -