How malleable is categorization by race? Evidence for competitive category use in social categorization

Karl Christoph Klauer, Fabian Hölzenbein, Jimmy Calanchini, Jeffrey Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We contrast 3 theoretical viewpoints concerning the factors affecting social categorization by race: (a) the classical theory of social categorization highlighting the role of a priori accessibility and situational factors, (b) the classical theory augmented by a principle of competitive category use, and (c) competition between race (but not gender) and coalition with race (but not gender) encoded only as a proxy to coalition. Study 1 documents a confound that renders important portions of previous research difficult to interpret. In Studies 2 and 3, race categorization was stronger than categorization by more weakly accessible categories when situational support in terms of topic relevance was comparable across categories. A situational focus on race further increased race categorization. Race categorization was reduced in the presence of strongly cued cross-cutting coalitions. Race categorization also was depressed when situational factors promoted comparative processing of cross-cutting categories while cues to potential coalitional divisions were held constant (Study 4). Accessibility, topic relevance, and cuing cross-cutting coalitions had the same effects on gender categorization as found for race categorization (Study 5). Taken together, the results suggest that classical theories of social categorization have to be augmented by a principle of competitive category use that is not limited to a competition between race and coalition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-40
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume107
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

evidence
coalition
gender
Proxy
social factors
Cues
Research
Social Theory

Keywords

  • Category accessibility
  • Category fit
  • Race categorization
  • Social categorization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

How malleable is categorization by race? Evidence for competitive category use in social categorization. / Klauer, Karl Christoph; Hölzenbein, Fabian; Calanchini, Jimmy; Sherman, Jeffrey.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 107, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 21-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{34ff21741dfc4e12a04232af0086c1b8,
title = "How malleable is categorization by race? Evidence for competitive category use in social categorization",
abstract = "We contrast 3 theoretical viewpoints concerning the factors affecting social categorization by race: (a) the classical theory of social categorization highlighting the role of a priori accessibility and situational factors, (b) the classical theory augmented by a principle of competitive category use, and (c) competition between race (but not gender) and coalition with race (but not gender) encoded only as a proxy to coalition. Study 1 documents a confound that renders important portions of previous research difficult to interpret. In Studies 2 and 3, race categorization was stronger than categorization by more weakly accessible categories when situational support in terms of topic relevance was comparable across categories. A situational focus on race further increased race categorization. Race categorization was reduced in the presence of strongly cued cross-cutting coalitions. Race categorization also was depressed when situational factors promoted comparative processing of cross-cutting categories while cues to potential coalitional divisions were held constant (Study 4). Accessibility, topic relevance, and cuing cross-cutting coalitions had the same effects on gender categorization as found for race categorization (Study 5). Taken together, the results suggest that classical theories of social categorization have to be augmented by a principle of competitive category use that is not limited to a competition between race and coalition.",
keywords = "Category accessibility, Category fit, Race categorization, Social categorization",
author = "Klauer, {Karl Christoph} and Fabian H{\"o}lzenbein and Jimmy Calanchini and Jeffrey Sherman",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0036609",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "21--40",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How malleable is categorization by race? Evidence for competitive category use in social categorization

AU - Klauer, Karl Christoph

AU - Hölzenbein, Fabian

AU - Calanchini, Jimmy

AU - Sherman, Jeffrey

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - We contrast 3 theoretical viewpoints concerning the factors affecting social categorization by race: (a) the classical theory of social categorization highlighting the role of a priori accessibility and situational factors, (b) the classical theory augmented by a principle of competitive category use, and (c) competition between race (but not gender) and coalition with race (but not gender) encoded only as a proxy to coalition. Study 1 documents a confound that renders important portions of previous research difficult to interpret. In Studies 2 and 3, race categorization was stronger than categorization by more weakly accessible categories when situational support in terms of topic relevance was comparable across categories. A situational focus on race further increased race categorization. Race categorization was reduced in the presence of strongly cued cross-cutting coalitions. Race categorization also was depressed when situational factors promoted comparative processing of cross-cutting categories while cues to potential coalitional divisions were held constant (Study 4). Accessibility, topic relevance, and cuing cross-cutting coalitions had the same effects on gender categorization as found for race categorization (Study 5). Taken together, the results suggest that classical theories of social categorization have to be augmented by a principle of competitive category use that is not limited to a competition between race and coalition.

AB - We contrast 3 theoretical viewpoints concerning the factors affecting social categorization by race: (a) the classical theory of social categorization highlighting the role of a priori accessibility and situational factors, (b) the classical theory augmented by a principle of competitive category use, and (c) competition between race (but not gender) and coalition with race (but not gender) encoded only as a proxy to coalition. Study 1 documents a confound that renders important portions of previous research difficult to interpret. In Studies 2 and 3, race categorization was stronger than categorization by more weakly accessible categories when situational support in terms of topic relevance was comparable across categories. A situational focus on race further increased race categorization. Race categorization was reduced in the presence of strongly cued cross-cutting coalitions. Race categorization also was depressed when situational factors promoted comparative processing of cross-cutting categories while cues to potential coalitional divisions were held constant (Study 4). Accessibility, topic relevance, and cuing cross-cutting coalitions had the same effects on gender categorization as found for race categorization (Study 5). Taken together, the results suggest that classical theories of social categorization have to be augmented by a principle of competitive category use that is not limited to a competition between race and coalition.

KW - Category accessibility

KW - Category fit

KW - Race categorization

KW - Social categorization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902952179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902952179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0036609

DO - 10.1037/a0036609

M3 - Article

C2 - 24956312

AN - SCOPUS:84902952179

VL - 107

SP - 21

EP - 40

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 1

ER -