How Educators Conceptualize and Teach Reflective Practice: A Survey of North American Pediatric Medical Educators

Lavjay Butani, Susan L. Bannister, Allison Rubin, Karen L. Forbes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The objectives of this study were to explore pediatric undergraduate medical educators' understanding of reflective practice, the barriers they face in teaching this, the curricular activities they use, and the value they assign to reflective practice. Methods Nine survey questions were sent to members of the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics, an international pediatric undergraduate medical educator group. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses were analyzed qualitatively through an iterative process to establish themes representing understanding of reflective practice and barriers in teaching this. Results Respondents representing 56% of all North American schools answered at least 1 survey question. Qualitative analysis of understanding of reflection revealed 11 themes spanning all components of reflective practice, albeit with a narrow view on triggers for reflection and a lower emphasis on understanding the why of things and on perspective-taking. The most frequent barriers in teaching this were the lack of skilled educators and limited time. Most respondents valued reflective skills but few reported confidence in their ability to teach reflection. Several curricular activities were used to teach reflection, the most common being narrative writing. Conclusions Pediatric undergraduate medical educators value reflection and endorse its teaching. However, many do not have a complete understanding of the construct and few report confidence in teaching this. Implementing longitudinal curricula in reflective practice may require a culture change; opportunities exist for faculty development about the meaning and value of reflective practice and how best to teach this.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-309
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Pediatrics
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Teaching
Pediatrics
Medical Education
Medical Students
Practice Guidelines
Curriculum
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • curriculum
  • reflective practice
  • undergraduate medical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

How Educators Conceptualize and Teach Reflective Practice : A Survey of North American Pediatric Medical Educators. / Butani, Lavjay; Bannister, Susan L.; Rubin, Allison; Forbes, Karen L.

In: Academic Pediatrics, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.04.2017, p. 303-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Butani, Lavjay ; Bannister, Susan L. ; Rubin, Allison ; Forbes, Karen L. / How Educators Conceptualize and Teach Reflective Practice : A Survey of North American Pediatric Medical Educators. In: Academic Pediatrics. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 303-309.
@article{239c19a420db44c69803779ae6767cc7,
title = "How Educators Conceptualize and Teach Reflective Practice: A Survey of North American Pediatric Medical Educators",
abstract = "Objective The objectives of this study were to explore pediatric undergraduate medical educators' understanding of reflective practice, the barriers they face in teaching this, the curricular activities they use, and the value they assign to reflective practice. Methods Nine survey questions were sent to members of the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics, an international pediatric undergraduate medical educator group. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses were analyzed qualitatively through an iterative process to establish themes representing understanding of reflective practice and barriers in teaching this. Results Respondents representing 56{\%} of all North American schools answered at least 1 survey question. Qualitative analysis of understanding of reflection revealed 11 themes spanning all components of reflective practice, albeit with a narrow view on triggers for reflection and a lower emphasis on understanding the why of things and on perspective-taking. The most frequent barriers in teaching this were the lack of skilled educators and limited time. Most respondents valued reflective skills but few reported confidence in their ability to teach reflection. Several curricular activities were used to teach reflection, the most common being narrative writing. Conclusions Pediatric undergraduate medical educators value reflection and endorse its teaching. However, many do not have a complete understanding of the construct and few report confidence in teaching this. Implementing longitudinal curricula in reflective practice may require a culture change; opportunities exist for faculty development about the meaning and value of reflective practice and how best to teach this.",
keywords = "curriculum, reflective practice, undergraduate medical education",
author = "Lavjay Butani and Bannister, {Susan L.} and Allison Rubin and Forbes, {Karen L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "303--309",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Educators Conceptualize and Teach Reflective Practice

T2 - A Survey of North American Pediatric Medical Educators

AU - Butani, Lavjay

AU - Bannister, Susan L.

AU - Rubin, Allison

AU - Forbes, Karen L.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Objective The objectives of this study were to explore pediatric undergraduate medical educators' understanding of reflective practice, the barriers they face in teaching this, the curricular activities they use, and the value they assign to reflective practice. Methods Nine survey questions were sent to members of the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics, an international pediatric undergraduate medical educator group. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses were analyzed qualitatively through an iterative process to establish themes representing understanding of reflective practice and barriers in teaching this. Results Respondents representing 56% of all North American schools answered at least 1 survey question. Qualitative analysis of understanding of reflection revealed 11 themes spanning all components of reflective practice, albeit with a narrow view on triggers for reflection and a lower emphasis on understanding the why of things and on perspective-taking. The most frequent barriers in teaching this were the lack of skilled educators and limited time. Most respondents valued reflective skills but few reported confidence in their ability to teach reflection. Several curricular activities were used to teach reflection, the most common being narrative writing. Conclusions Pediatric undergraduate medical educators value reflection and endorse its teaching. However, many do not have a complete understanding of the construct and few report confidence in teaching this. Implementing longitudinal curricula in reflective practice may require a culture change; opportunities exist for faculty development about the meaning and value of reflective practice and how best to teach this.

AB - Objective The objectives of this study were to explore pediatric undergraduate medical educators' understanding of reflective practice, the barriers they face in teaching this, the curricular activities they use, and the value they assign to reflective practice. Methods Nine survey questions were sent to members of the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics, an international pediatric undergraduate medical educator group. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses were analyzed qualitatively through an iterative process to establish themes representing understanding of reflective practice and barriers in teaching this. Results Respondents representing 56% of all North American schools answered at least 1 survey question. Qualitative analysis of understanding of reflection revealed 11 themes spanning all components of reflective practice, albeit with a narrow view on triggers for reflection and a lower emphasis on understanding the why of things and on perspective-taking. The most frequent barriers in teaching this were the lack of skilled educators and limited time. Most respondents valued reflective skills but few reported confidence in their ability to teach reflection. Several curricular activities were used to teach reflection, the most common being narrative writing. Conclusions Pediatric undergraduate medical educators value reflection and endorse its teaching. However, many do not have a complete understanding of the construct and few report confidence in teaching this. Implementing longitudinal curricula in reflective practice may require a culture change; opportunities exist for faculty development about the meaning and value of reflective practice and how best to teach this.

KW - curriculum

KW - reflective practice

KW - undergraduate medical education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009953656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009953656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 27993644

AN - SCOPUS:85009953656

VL - 17

SP - 303

EP - 309

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

IS - 3

ER -