How can diagnostic assessment programs be implemented to enhance inter-professional collaborative care for cancer?

Anna R. Gagliardi, Terri Stuart-McEwan, Julie Gilbert, Frances C. Wright, Jeffrey S Hoch, Melissa C. Brouwers, Mark J. Dobrow, Thomas K. Waddell, David R. McCready

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Inter-professional collaborative care (ICC) for cancer leads to multiple system, organizational, professional, and patient benefits, but is limited by numerous challenges. Empirical research on interventions that promote or enable ICC is sparse so guidance on how to achieve ICC is lacking. Research shows that ICC for diagnosis could be improved. Diagnostic assessment programs (DAPs) appear to be a promising model for enabling ICC. The purpose of this study was to explore how DAP structure and function enable ICC, and whether that may be associated with organizational and clinical outcomes.Methods: A case study approach will be used to explore ICC among eight DAPs that vary by type of cancer (lung, breast), academic status, and geographic region. To describe DAP function and outcomes, and gather information that will enable costing, recommendations expressed in DAP standards and clinical guidelines will be assessed through retrospective observational study. Data will be acquired from databases maintained by participating DAPs and the provincial cancer agency, and confirmed by and supplemented with review of medical records. We will conduct a pilot study to explore the feasibility of estimating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using person-level data from medical records and other sources. Interviews will be conducted with health professionals, staff, and referring physicians from each DAP to learn about barriers and facilitators of ICC. Qualitative methods based on a grounded approach will be used to guide sampling, data collection and analysis.Discussion: Findings may reveal opportunities for unique structures, interventions or tools that enable ICC that could be developed, implemented, and evaluated through future research. This information will serve as a formative needs assessment to identify the nature of ongoing or required improvements, which can be directly used by our decision maker collaborators, and as a framework by policy makers, cancer system managers, and DAP managers elsewhere to strategically plan for and implement diagnostic cancer services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4
JournalImplementation Science
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 3 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Records
Neoplasms
Diagnostic Services
Empirical Research
Needs Assessment
Administrative Personnel
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Observational Studies
Lung Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies
Databases
Guidelines
Interviews
Breast Neoplasms
Physicians
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Communication
  • Cooperative behavior
  • Diagnostic assessment program
  • Inter-professional collaborative care
  • Inter-professional relations
  • Lung cancer
  • Multidisciplinary care team

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Health Policy
  • Health Informatics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Gagliardi, A. R., Stuart-McEwan, T., Gilbert, J., Wright, F. C., Hoch, J. S., Brouwers, M. C., ... McCready, D. R. (2014). How can diagnostic assessment programs be implemented to enhance inter-professional collaborative care for cancer? Implementation Science, 9(1), [4]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-4

How can diagnostic assessment programs be implemented to enhance inter-professional collaborative care for cancer? / Gagliardi, Anna R.; Stuart-McEwan, Terri; Gilbert, Julie; Wright, Frances C.; Hoch, Jeffrey S; Brouwers, Melissa C.; Dobrow, Mark J.; Waddell, Thomas K.; McCready, David R.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 9, No. 1, 4, 03.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gagliardi, AR, Stuart-McEwan, T, Gilbert, J, Wright, FC, Hoch, JS, Brouwers, MC, Dobrow, MJ, Waddell, TK & McCready, DR 2014, 'How can diagnostic assessment programs be implemented to enhance inter-professional collaborative care for cancer?', Implementation Science, vol. 9, no. 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-4
Gagliardi, Anna R. ; Stuart-McEwan, Terri ; Gilbert, Julie ; Wright, Frances C. ; Hoch, Jeffrey S ; Brouwers, Melissa C. ; Dobrow, Mark J. ; Waddell, Thomas K. ; McCready, David R. / How can diagnostic assessment programs be implemented to enhance inter-professional collaborative care for cancer?. In: Implementation Science. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.
@article{5f4a86baac534810930581df9b9a5996,
title = "How can diagnostic assessment programs be implemented to enhance inter-professional collaborative care for cancer?",
abstract = "Background: Inter-professional collaborative care (ICC) for cancer leads to multiple system, organizational, professional, and patient benefits, but is limited by numerous challenges. Empirical research on interventions that promote or enable ICC is sparse so guidance on how to achieve ICC is lacking. Research shows that ICC for diagnosis could be improved. Diagnostic assessment programs (DAPs) appear to be a promising model for enabling ICC. The purpose of this study was to explore how DAP structure and function enable ICC, and whether that may be associated with organizational and clinical outcomes.Methods: A case study approach will be used to explore ICC among eight DAPs that vary by type of cancer (lung, breast), academic status, and geographic region. To describe DAP function and outcomes, and gather information that will enable costing, recommendations expressed in DAP standards and clinical guidelines will be assessed through retrospective observational study. Data will be acquired from databases maintained by participating DAPs and the provincial cancer agency, and confirmed by and supplemented with review of medical records. We will conduct a pilot study to explore the feasibility of estimating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using person-level data from medical records and other sources. Interviews will be conducted with health professionals, staff, and referring physicians from each DAP to learn about barriers and facilitators of ICC. Qualitative methods based on a grounded approach will be used to guide sampling, data collection and analysis.Discussion: Findings may reveal opportunities for unique structures, interventions or tools that enable ICC that could be developed, implemented, and evaluated through future research. This information will serve as a formative needs assessment to identify the nature of ongoing or required improvements, which can be directly used by our decision maker collaborators, and as a framework by policy makers, cancer system managers, and DAP managers elsewhere to strategically plan for and implement diagnostic cancer services.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Communication, Cooperative behavior, Diagnostic assessment program, Inter-professional collaborative care, Inter-professional relations, Lung cancer, Multidisciplinary care team",
author = "Gagliardi, {Anna R.} and Terri Stuart-McEwan and Julie Gilbert and Wright, {Frances C.} and Hoch, {Jeffrey S} and Brouwers, {Melissa C.} and Dobrow, {Mark J.} and Waddell, {Thomas K.} and McCready, {David R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1186/1748-5908-9-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How can diagnostic assessment programs be implemented to enhance inter-professional collaborative care for cancer?

AU - Gagliardi, Anna R.

AU - Stuart-McEwan, Terri

AU - Gilbert, Julie

AU - Wright, Frances C.

AU - Hoch, Jeffrey S

AU - Brouwers, Melissa C.

AU - Dobrow, Mark J.

AU - Waddell, Thomas K.

AU - McCready, David R.

PY - 2014/1/3

Y1 - 2014/1/3

N2 - Background: Inter-professional collaborative care (ICC) for cancer leads to multiple system, organizational, professional, and patient benefits, but is limited by numerous challenges. Empirical research on interventions that promote or enable ICC is sparse so guidance on how to achieve ICC is lacking. Research shows that ICC for diagnosis could be improved. Diagnostic assessment programs (DAPs) appear to be a promising model for enabling ICC. The purpose of this study was to explore how DAP structure and function enable ICC, and whether that may be associated with organizational and clinical outcomes.Methods: A case study approach will be used to explore ICC among eight DAPs that vary by type of cancer (lung, breast), academic status, and geographic region. To describe DAP function and outcomes, and gather information that will enable costing, recommendations expressed in DAP standards and clinical guidelines will be assessed through retrospective observational study. Data will be acquired from databases maintained by participating DAPs and the provincial cancer agency, and confirmed by and supplemented with review of medical records. We will conduct a pilot study to explore the feasibility of estimating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using person-level data from medical records and other sources. Interviews will be conducted with health professionals, staff, and referring physicians from each DAP to learn about barriers and facilitators of ICC. Qualitative methods based on a grounded approach will be used to guide sampling, data collection and analysis.Discussion: Findings may reveal opportunities for unique structures, interventions or tools that enable ICC that could be developed, implemented, and evaluated through future research. This information will serve as a formative needs assessment to identify the nature of ongoing or required improvements, which can be directly used by our decision maker collaborators, and as a framework by policy makers, cancer system managers, and DAP managers elsewhere to strategically plan for and implement diagnostic cancer services.

AB - Background: Inter-professional collaborative care (ICC) for cancer leads to multiple system, organizational, professional, and patient benefits, but is limited by numerous challenges. Empirical research on interventions that promote or enable ICC is sparse so guidance on how to achieve ICC is lacking. Research shows that ICC for diagnosis could be improved. Diagnostic assessment programs (DAPs) appear to be a promising model for enabling ICC. The purpose of this study was to explore how DAP structure and function enable ICC, and whether that may be associated with organizational and clinical outcomes.Methods: A case study approach will be used to explore ICC among eight DAPs that vary by type of cancer (lung, breast), academic status, and geographic region. To describe DAP function and outcomes, and gather information that will enable costing, recommendations expressed in DAP standards and clinical guidelines will be assessed through retrospective observational study. Data will be acquired from databases maintained by participating DAPs and the provincial cancer agency, and confirmed by and supplemented with review of medical records. We will conduct a pilot study to explore the feasibility of estimating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using person-level data from medical records and other sources. Interviews will be conducted with health professionals, staff, and referring physicians from each DAP to learn about barriers and facilitators of ICC. Qualitative methods based on a grounded approach will be used to guide sampling, data collection and analysis.Discussion: Findings may reveal opportunities for unique structures, interventions or tools that enable ICC that could be developed, implemented, and evaluated through future research. This information will serve as a formative needs assessment to identify the nature of ongoing or required improvements, which can be directly used by our decision maker collaborators, and as a framework by policy makers, cancer system managers, and DAP managers elsewhere to strategically plan for and implement diagnostic cancer services.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Communication

KW - Cooperative behavior

KW - Diagnostic assessment program

KW - Inter-professional collaborative care

KW - Inter-professional relations

KW - Lung cancer

KW - Multidisciplinary care team

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891773905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891773905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-9-4

DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-9-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 24383742

AN - SCOPUS:84891773905

VL - 9

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

IS - 1

M1 - 4

ER -