How Can Animal Disease Risks be Better Managed?

Tim Carpenter, Karl M. Rich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Livestock farming is imbued with a variety of disease-related risks. The threat of disease, and actions taken (or not taken) to mitigate it, can impact both the broader livestock sector and potentially society at large if the disease is what is termed zoonotic i.e. impacting both animal and human health alike. Understanding the nature of these risks is crucial to improve policymaking and requires multidisciplinary toolkits. In this article we identify various frameworks from economics and epidemiology to analyze the impact of animal disease risks in livestock environments. From this, we examine the policy responses implemented to better manage risk, and conclude by identifying the current gaps in the decision process related to risk and uncertainty, which is a reflection of imperfect knowledge. Recent advances in our modeling frameworks have helped streamline the complex decision space faced by policymakers and improved our understanding of the risks and consequences of mitigation strategies. At the same time, while there has been significant progress in integrating economic and epidemiological tools to analyze risk, more work is required to understand the feedbacks between disease and behaviour taken to control it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-17
Number of pages6
JournalEuroChoices
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

animal
Disease
livestock
livestock farming
epidemiology
animal disease
economics
mitigation
uncertainty
threat
health
modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

How Can Animal Disease Risks be Better Managed? / Carpenter, Tim; Rich, Karl M.

In: EuroChoices, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.08.2012, p. 12-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carpenter, Tim ; Rich, Karl M. / How Can Animal Disease Risks be Better Managed?. In: EuroChoices. 2012 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 12-17.
@article{69d9af3ef95442399b780073ddbfb50e,
title = "How Can Animal Disease Risks be Better Managed?",
abstract = "Livestock farming is imbued with a variety of disease-related risks. The threat of disease, and actions taken (or not taken) to mitigate it, can impact both the broader livestock sector and potentially society at large if the disease is what is termed zoonotic i.e. impacting both animal and human health alike. Understanding the nature of these risks is crucial to improve policymaking and requires multidisciplinary toolkits. In this article we identify various frameworks from economics and epidemiology to analyze the impact of animal disease risks in livestock environments. From this, we examine the policy responses implemented to better manage risk, and conclude by identifying the current gaps in the decision process related to risk and uncertainty, which is a reflection of imperfect knowledge. Recent advances in our modeling frameworks have helped streamline the complex decision space faced by policymakers and improved our understanding of the risks and consequences of mitigation strategies. At the same time, while there has been significant progress in integrating economic and epidemiological tools to analyze risk, more work is required to understand the feedbacks between disease and behaviour taken to control it.",
author = "Tim Carpenter and Rich, {Karl M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1746-692X.2012.00228.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "12--17",
journal = "EuroChoices",
issn = "1478-0917",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Can Animal Disease Risks be Better Managed?

AU - Carpenter, Tim

AU - Rich, Karl M.

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - Livestock farming is imbued with a variety of disease-related risks. The threat of disease, and actions taken (or not taken) to mitigate it, can impact both the broader livestock sector and potentially society at large if the disease is what is termed zoonotic i.e. impacting both animal and human health alike. Understanding the nature of these risks is crucial to improve policymaking and requires multidisciplinary toolkits. In this article we identify various frameworks from economics and epidemiology to analyze the impact of animal disease risks in livestock environments. From this, we examine the policy responses implemented to better manage risk, and conclude by identifying the current gaps in the decision process related to risk and uncertainty, which is a reflection of imperfect knowledge. Recent advances in our modeling frameworks have helped streamline the complex decision space faced by policymakers and improved our understanding of the risks and consequences of mitigation strategies. At the same time, while there has been significant progress in integrating economic and epidemiological tools to analyze risk, more work is required to understand the feedbacks between disease and behaviour taken to control it.

AB - Livestock farming is imbued with a variety of disease-related risks. The threat of disease, and actions taken (or not taken) to mitigate it, can impact both the broader livestock sector and potentially society at large if the disease is what is termed zoonotic i.e. impacting both animal and human health alike. Understanding the nature of these risks is crucial to improve policymaking and requires multidisciplinary toolkits. In this article we identify various frameworks from economics and epidemiology to analyze the impact of animal disease risks in livestock environments. From this, we examine the policy responses implemented to better manage risk, and conclude by identifying the current gaps in the decision process related to risk and uncertainty, which is a reflection of imperfect knowledge. Recent advances in our modeling frameworks have helped streamline the complex decision space faced by policymakers and improved our understanding of the risks and consequences of mitigation strategies. At the same time, while there has been significant progress in integrating economic and epidemiological tools to analyze risk, more work is required to understand the feedbacks between disease and behaviour taken to control it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864747244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864747244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2012.00228.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2012.00228.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864747244

VL - 11

SP - 12

EP - 17

JO - EuroChoices

JF - EuroChoices

SN - 1478-0917

IS - 2

ER -