How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge?

Allen A. Rovick, Joel A. Michael, Harold I. Modell, David S. Bruce, Barbara A Horwitz, Thomas Adamson, Daniel R. Richardson, Dee U. Silverthorn, Shirley A. Whitescarver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Teachers establish prerequisites that students must meet before they are permitted to enter their courses. It is expected that having these prerequisites will provide students with the knowledge and skills they will need to successfully learn the course content. Also, the material that the students are expected to have previously learned need not be included in a course. We wanted to determine how accurate instructors' understanding of their students background knowledge actually was. To do this, we wrote a set of multiple-choice questions that could be used to test students' knowledge of concepts deemed to be essential for learning respiratory physiology. Instructors then selected 10 of these questions to be used as a prerequisite knowledge test. The instructors also predicted the performance they expected from the students on each of the questions they had selected. The resulting tests were administered in the first week of each of seven courses. The results of this study demonstrate that instructors are poor judges of what beginning students know. Instructors tended to both underestimate and overestimate students' knowledge by large margins on individual questions. Although on the average they tended to underestimate students' factual knowledge, they overestimated the students' abilities to apply this knowledge. Hence, the validity of decisions that instructors make, predicated on the basis of their students having the prerequisite knowledge that they expect, is open to question.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
Volume21
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Students
Respiratory Physiological Phenomena
Aptitude
Learning

Keywords

  • Course prerequisites
  • Prerequisite knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

Rovick, A. A., Michael, J. A., Modell, H. I., Bruce, D. S., Horwitz, B. A., Adamson, T., ... Whitescarver, S. A. (1999). How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge? American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 21(1).

How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge? / Rovick, Allen A.; Michael, Joel A.; Modell, Harold I.; Bruce, David S.; Horwitz, Barbara A; Adamson, Thomas; Richardson, Daniel R.; Silverthorn, Dee U.; Whitescarver, Shirley A.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1999.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rovick, AA, Michael, JA, Modell, HI, Bruce, DS, Horwitz, BA, Adamson, T, Richardson, DR, Silverthorn, DU & Whitescarver, SA 1999, 'How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge?', American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 21, no. 1.
Rovick, Allen A. ; Michael, Joel A. ; Modell, Harold I. ; Bruce, David S. ; Horwitz, Barbara A ; Adamson, Thomas ; Richardson, Daniel R. ; Silverthorn, Dee U. ; Whitescarver, Shirley A. / How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge?. In: American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education. 1999 ; Vol. 21, No. 1.
@article{6da1fde730bb43a6b8fb3d97e5f82c66,
title = "How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge?",
abstract = "Teachers establish prerequisites that students must meet before they are permitted to enter their courses. It is expected that having these prerequisites will provide students with the knowledge and skills they will need to successfully learn the course content. Also, the material that the students are expected to have previously learned need not be included in a course. We wanted to determine how accurate instructors' understanding of their students background knowledge actually was. To do this, we wrote a set of multiple-choice questions that could be used to test students' knowledge of concepts deemed to be essential for learning respiratory physiology. Instructors then selected 10 of these questions to be used as a prerequisite knowledge test. The instructors also predicted the performance they expected from the students on each of the questions they had selected. The resulting tests were administered in the first week of each of seven courses. The results of this study demonstrate that instructors are poor judges of what beginning students know. Instructors tended to both underestimate and overestimate students' knowledge by large margins on individual questions. Although on the average they tended to underestimate students' factual knowledge, they overestimated the students' abilities to apply this knowledge. Hence, the validity of decisions that instructors make, predicated on the basis of their students having the prerequisite knowledge that they expect, is open to question.",
keywords = "Course prerequisites, Prerequisite knowledge",
author = "Rovick, {Allen A.} and Michael, {Joel A.} and Modell, {Harold I.} and Bruce, {David S.} and Horwitz, {Barbara A} and Thomas Adamson and Richardson, {Daniel R.} and Silverthorn, {Dee U.} and Whitescarver, {Shirley A.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education",
issn = "1043-4046",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge?

AU - Rovick, Allen A.

AU - Michael, Joel A.

AU - Modell, Harold I.

AU - Bruce, David S.

AU - Horwitz, Barbara A

AU - Adamson, Thomas

AU - Richardson, Daniel R.

AU - Silverthorn, Dee U.

AU - Whitescarver, Shirley A.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Teachers establish prerequisites that students must meet before they are permitted to enter their courses. It is expected that having these prerequisites will provide students with the knowledge and skills they will need to successfully learn the course content. Also, the material that the students are expected to have previously learned need not be included in a course. We wanted to determine how accurate instructors' understanding of their students background knowledge actually was. To do this, we wrote a set of multiple-choice questions that could be used to test students' knowledge of concepts deemed to be essential for learning respiratory physiology. Instructors then selected 10 of these questions to be used as a prerequisite knowledge test. The instructors also predicted the performance they expected from the students on each of the questions they had selected. The resulting tests were administered in the first week of each of seven courses. The results of this study demonstrate that instructors are poor judges of what beginning students know. Instructors tended to both underestimate and overestimate students' knowledge by large margins on individual questions. Although on the average they tended to underestimate students' factual knowledge, they overestimated the students' abilities to apply this knowledge. Hence, the validity of decisions that instructors make, predicated on the basis of their students having the prerequisite knowledge that they expect, is open to question.

AB - Teachers establish prerequisites that students must meet before they are permitted to enter their courses. It is expected that having these prerequisites will provide students with the knowledge and skills they will need to successfully learn the course content. Also, the material that the students are expected to have previously learned need not be included in a course. We wanted to determine how accurate instructors' understanding of their students background knowledge actually was. To do this, we wrote a set of multiple-choice questions that could be used to test students' knowledge of concepts deemed to be essential for learning respiratory physiology. Instructors then selected 10 of these questions to be used as a prerequisite knowledge test. The instructors also predicted the performance they expected from the students on each of the questions they had selected. The resulting tests were administered in the first week of each of seven courses. The results of this study demonstrate that instructors are poor judges of what beginning students know. Instructors tended to both underestimate and overestimate students' knowledge by large margins on individual questions. Although on the average they tended to underestimate students' factual knowledge, they overestimated the students' abilities to apply this knowledge. Hence, the validity of decisions that instructors make, predicated on the basis of their students having the prerequisite knowledge that they expect, is open to question.

KW - Course prerequisites

KW - Prerequisite knowledge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032996064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032996064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16211673

AN - SCOPUS:0032996064

VL - 21

JO - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

JF - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

SN - 1043-4046

IS - 1

ER -