Hope for the hygiene hypothesis: When the dirt hits the fan

Andrea T. Borchers, Carl L Keen, M. Eric Gershwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The hygiene hypothesis was developed in response to data suggesting that the increase in allergic diseases as well as asthma was secondary to a reduced exposure to infectious stimuli. Indeed, the epidemiologic changes, resulting in an increase in atopic disease, have been impressive and intriguing. Furthermore, although there clearly is a genetic component to atopic diseases, genetics cannot account for a marked increase in the incidence and prevalence of allergic manifestations within a few generations. Thus, environmental factors have been suggested as responsible for the changing prevalence. There are two-not mutually exclusive-possibilities, namely, that substances that promote atopy have been added to the environment or that factors that provided protection from allergic disease were lost from the environment. Both outdoor and indoor pollution, along with a long list of other environmental factors, have been proposed. It is of interest that in many developed countries, certain types of pollution have decreased, whereas the prevalence of atopic disease has increased. In this review, we have explored a detailed analysis of a large number of studies that have focused on this issue and suggest that, although the hygiene hypothesis has merit, the stimuli responsible for the new epidemiology remain enigmatic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-247
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Asthma
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Hygiene Hypothesis
Inborn Genetic Diseases
Developed Countries
Epidemiology
Asthma
Incidence

Keywords

  • Allergic rhinitis
  • Asthma
  • Atopic dermatitis
  • Atopic diseases
  • Childhood infections
  • Hygiene hypothesis
  • Microflora

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Hope for the hygiene hypothesis : When the dirt hits the fan. / Borchers, Andrea T.; Keen, Carl L; Gershwin, M. Eric.

In: Journal of Asthma, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2005, p. 225-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borchers, Andrea T. ; Keen, Carl L ; Gershwin, M. Eric. / Hope for the hygiene hypothesis : When the dirt hits the fan. In: Journal of Asthma. 2005 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 225-247.
@article{35de2c91b56d4e67b10a01e81bcacd7c,
title = "Hope for the hygiene hypothesis: When the dirt hits the fan",
abstract = "The hygiene hypothesis was developed in response to data suggesting that the increase in allergic diseases as well as asthma was secondary to a reduced exposure to infectious stimuli. Indeed, the epidemiologic changes, resulting in an increase in atopic disease, have been impressive and intriguing. Furthermore, although there clearly is a genetic component to atopic diseases, genetics cannot account for a marked increase in the incidence and prevalence of allergic manifestations within a few generations. Thus, environmental factors have been suggested as responsible for the changing prevalence. There are two-not mutually exclusive-possibilities, namely, that substances that promote atopy have been added to the environment or that factors that provided protection from allergic disease were lost from the environment. Both outdoor and indoor pollution, along with a long list of other environmental factors, have been proposed. It is of interest that in many developed countries, certain types of pollution have decreased, whereas the prevalence of atopic disease has increased. In this review, we have explored a detailed analysis of a large number of studies that have focused on this issue and suggest that, although the hygiene hypothesis has merit, the stimuli responsible for the new epidemiology remain enigmatic.",
keywords = "Allergic rhinitis, Asthma, Atopic dermatitis, Atopic diseases, Childhood infections, Hygiene hypothesis, Microflora",
author = "Borchers, {Andrea T.} and Keen, {Carl L} and Gershwin, {M. Eric}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1081/JAS-200051302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "225--247",
journal = "Journal of Asthma",
issn = "0277-0903",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hope for the hygiene hypothesis

T2 - When the dirt hits the fan

AU - Borchers, Andrea T.

AU - Keen, Carl L

AU - Gershwin, M. Eric

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The hygiene hypothesis was developed in response to data suggesting that the increase in allergic diseases as well as asthma was secondary to a reduced exposure to infectious stimuli. Indeed, the epidemiologic changes, resulting in an increase in atopic disease, have been impressive and intriguing. Furthermore, although there clearly is a genetic component to atopic diseases, genetics cannot account for a marked increase in the incidence and prevalence of allergic manifestations within a few generations. Thus, environmental factors have been suggested as responsible for the changing prevalence. There are two-not mutually exclusive-possibilities, namely, that substances that promote atopy have been added to the environment or that factors that provided protection from allergic disease were lost from the environment. Both outdoor and indoor pollution, along with a long list of other environmental factors, have been proposed. It is of interest that in many developed countries, certain types of pollution have decreased, whereas the prevalence of atopic disease has increased. In this review, we have explored a detailed analysis of a large number of studies that have focused on this issue and suggest that, although the hygiene hypothesis has merit, the stimuli responsible for the new epidemiology remain enigmatic.

AB - The hygiene hypothesis was developed in response to data suggesting that the increase in allergic diseases as well as asthma was secondary to a reduced exposure to infectious stimuli. Indeed, the epidemiologic changes, resulting in an increase in atopic disease, have been impressive and intriguing. Furthermore, although there clearly is a genetic component to atopic diseases, genetics cannot account for a marked increase in the incidence and prevalence of allergic manifestations within a few generations. Thus, environmental factors have been suggested as responsible for the changing prevalence. There are two-not mutually exclusive-possibilities, namely, that substances that promote atopy have been added to the environment or that factors that provided protection from allergic disease were lost from the environment. Both outdoor and indoor pollution, along with a long list of other environmental factors, have been proposed. It is of interest that in many developed countries, certain types of pollution have decreased, whereas the prevalence of atopic disease has increased. In this review, we have explored a detailed analysis of a large number of studies that have focused on this issue and suggest that, although the hygiene hypothesis has merit, the stimuli responsible for the new epidemiology remain enigmatic.

KW - Allergic rhinitis

KW - Asthma

KW - Atopic dermatitis

KW - Atopic diseases

KW - Childhood infections

KW - Hygiene hypothesis

KW - Microflora

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22044444746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22044444746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1081/JAS-200051302

DO - 10.1081/JAS-200051302

M3 - Article

C2 - 16032932

AN - SCOPUS:22044444746

VL - 42

SP - 225

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Asthma

JF - Journal of Asthma

SN - 0277-0903

IS - 4

ER -