Home vs hospital treatment of low-risk venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rasha Khatib, Stephanie Ross, Sean Alexander Kennedy, Ivan D. Florez, Thomas L. Ortel, Robby Nieuwlaat, Ignacio Neumann, Daniel M. Witt, Sam Schulman, Veena Manja, Rebecca Beyth, Nathan P. Clark, Wojtek Wiercioch, Holger J. Sch¨unemann, Yuqing Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Increasing evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of managing low-risk deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) in outpatient settings. We performed a systematic review to assess safety and effectiveness of managing patients with DVT or PE at home compared with the hospital. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to July 2019 for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and prospective cohort studies. Two investigators independently screened titles and abstracts of identified citations and extracted data from relevant full-text papers. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated, and certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Seven RCTs (1922 patients) were included in metaanalyses on managing patients with DVT. Pooled estimates indicated decreased risk of PE (RR = 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.93) and recurrent DVT (RR =0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.90) for home management, both with moderate certainty of the evidence. Reductions in mortality and major bleeding were not significant, both with low certainty of the evidence. Two RCTs (445 patients) were included in meta-analyses on home management of low-risk patients with PE. Pooled estimates indicated no significant difference in all-cause mortality, recurrent PE, and major bleeding, all with low certainty of the evidence. Results of pooled estimates from 3 prospective cohort studies (234 patients) on home management of PE showed similar results. Our findings indicate that low-risk DVT patients had similar or lower risk of patient-important outcomes with home treatment compared with hospital treatment. In patients with low-risk PE, there was important uncertainty about a difference between home and hospital treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)500-513
Number of pages14
JournalBlood Advances
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 11 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Home vs hospital treatment of low-risk venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Khatib, R., Ross, S., Kennedy, S. A., Florez, I. D., Ortel, T. L., Nieuwlaat, R., Neumann, I., Witt, D. M., Schulman, S., Manja, V., Beyth, R., Clark, N. P., Wiercioch, W., Sch¨unemann, H. J., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Home vs hospital treatment of low-risk venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Advances, 4(3), 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001223