Hepatitis C videoconferencing: The impact on continuing medical education for rural healthcare providers

Lorenzo Rossaro, Thu P. Tran, Kanat Ransibrahmanakul, Julie A. Rainwater, Genell Csik, Stacey L. Cole, Colette C. Prosser, Thomas S Nesbitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the impact of multipoint videoconferencing (VC) versus standard lecturing (ST) on primary care providers' (MDs, NPs/PAs, and RNs) education regarding hepatitis C virus (HCV). The hypothesis was that the educational impact of teaching through telemedicine is comparable to the traditional method. The aim was to provide participants clinically relevant information and knowledge about the natural history, diagnosis, and management of HCV. Improved knowledge was scored from a 10-item quiz administered before and after the educational intervention. Comparison of the pretest knowledge scores within provider groups showed no statistically significant difference in baseline knowledge for the ST versus VC method. However, for all practitioners combined, the VC group scored significantly lower on the pretest than the ST group (p < 0.05). All three types of learners improved their knowledge scores following intervention. On average, MDs and NP/PAs correctly answered two to 3.5 more questions in the posttest. RNs showed the greatest improvements, correctly answering an average of four to five more questions following intervention. Improvement in knowledge scores between the two methods was statistically significant in favor of VC for the MDs (VC = 3.56 ± 1.92 vs. ST = 2.13 ± 1.89, p < 0.001) and all groups combined (VC 4.37 ± 1.92 vs ST 3.06 ± 1.89, p < 0.001). The results of this study indicate that VC is equivalent, if not better, than standard continuing medical education (CME). VC can potentially improve clinician education regarding the history, diagnosis, and management of HCV, thereby making a substantial impact on the clinical course of patients with this condition. In addition, VC has the potential to eliminate the financial and geographic barriers to professional education for rural practitioners.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-277
Number of pages9
JournalTelemedicine Journal and e-Health
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Medical education
Videoconferencing
Continuing Medical Education
Hepatitis C
Viruses
Health Personnel
Education
Telemedicine
Hepacivirus
Teaching
Professional Education
Natural History
Primary Health Care
History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Bioengineering
  • Media Technology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Hepatitis C videoconferencing : The impact on continuing medical education for rural healthcare providers. / Rossaro, Lorenzo; Tran, Thu P.; Ransibrahmanakul, Kanat; Rainwater, Julie A.; Csik, Genell; Cole, Stacey L.; Prosser, Colette C.; Nesbitt, Thomas S.

In: Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Vol. 13, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 269-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rossaro, Lorenzo ; Tran, Thu P. ; Ransibrahmanakul, Kanat ; Rainwater, Julie A. ; Csik, Genell ; Cole, Stacey L. ; Prosser, Colette C. ; Nesbitt, Thomas S. / Hepatitis C videoconferencing : The impact on continuing medical education for rural healthcare providers. In: Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 2007 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 269-277.
@article{790c444e66f545f5beb157ad0551a3f6,
title = "Hepatitis C videoconferencing: The impact on continuing medical education for rural healthcare providers",
abstract = "This study compared the impact of multipoint videoconferencing (VC) versus standard lecturing (ST) on primary care providers' (MDs, NPs/PAs, and RNs) education regarding hepatitis C virus (HCV). The hypothesis was that the educational impact of teaching through telemedicine is comparable to the traditional method. The aim was to provide participants clinically relevant information and knowledge about the natural history, diagnosis, and management of HCV. Improved knowledge was scored from a 10-item quiz administered before and after the educational intervention. Comparison of the pretest knowledge scores within provider groups showed no statistically significant difference in baseline knowledge for the ST versus VC method. However, for all practitioners combined, the VC group scored significantly lower on the pretest than the ST group (p < 0.05). All three types of learners improved their knowledge scores following intervention. On average, MDs and NP/PAs correctly answered two to 3.5 more questions in the posttest. RNs showed the greatest improvements, correctly answering an average of four to five more questions following intervention. Improvement in knowledge scores between the two methods was statistically significant in favor of VC for the MDs (VC = 3.56 ± 1.92 vs. ST = 2.13 ± 1.89, p < 0.001) and all groups combined (VC 4.37 ± 1.92 vs ST 3.06 ± 1.89, p < 0.001). The results of this study indicate that VC is equivalent, if not better, than standard continuing medical education (CME). VC can potentially improve clinician education regarding the history, diagnosis, and management of HCV, thereby making a substantial impact on the clinical course of patients with this condition. In addition, VC has the potential to eliminate the financial and geographic barriers to professional education for rural practitioners.",
author = "Lorenzo Rossaro and Tran, {Thu P.} and Kanat Ransibrahmanakul and Rainwater, {Julie A.} and Genell Csik and Cole, {Stacey L.} and Prosser, {Colette C.} and Nesbitt, {Thomas S}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1089/tmj.2006.0050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "269--277",
journal = "Telemedicine and e-Health",
issn = "1530-5627",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hepatitis C videoconferencing

T2 - The impact on continuing medical education for rural healthcare providers

AU - Rossaro, Lorenzo

AU - Tran, Thu P.

AU - Ransibrahmanakul, Kanat

AU - Rainwater, Julie A.

AU - Csik, Genell

AU - Cole, Stacey L.

AU - Prosser, Colette C.

AU - Nesbitt, Thomas S

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - This study compared the impact of multipoint videoconferencing (VC) versus standard lecturing (ST) on primary care providers' (MDs, NPs/PAs, and RNs) education regarding hepatitis C virus (HCV). The hypothesis was that the educational impact of teaching through telemedicine is comparable to the traditional method. The aim was to provide participants clinically relevant information and knowledge about the natural history, diagnosis, and management of HCV. Improved knowledge was scored from a 10-item quiz administered before and after the educational intervention. Comparison of the pretest knowledge scores within provider groups showed no statistically significant difference in baseline knowledge for the ST versus VC method. However, for all practitioners combined, the VC group scored significantly lower on the pretest than the ST group (p < 0.05). All three types of learners improved their knowledge scores following intervention. On average, MDs and NP/PAs correctly answered two to 3.5 more questions in the posttest. RNs showed the greatest improvements, correctly answering an average of four to five more questions following intervention. Improvement in knowledge scores between the two methods was statistically significant in favor of VC for the MDs (VC = 3.56 ± 1.92 vs. ST = 2.13 ± 1.89, p < 0.001) and all groups combined (VC 4.37 ± 1.92 vs ST 3.06 ± 1.89, p < 0.001). The results of this study indicate that VC is equivalent, if not better, than standard continuing medical education (CME). VC can potentially improve clinician education regarding the history, diagnosis, and management of HCV, thereby making a substantial impact on the clinical course of patients with this condition. In addition, VC has the potential to eliminate the financial and geographic barriers to professional education for rural practitioners.

AB - This study compared the impact of multipoint videoconferencing (VC) versus standard lecturing (ST) on primary care providers' (MDs, NPs/PAs, and RNs) education regarding hepatitis C virus (HCV). The hypothesis was that the educational impact of teaching through telemedicine is comparable to the traditional method. The aim was to provide participants clinically relevant information and knowledge about the natural history, diagnosis, and management of HCV. Improved knowledge was scored from a 10-item quiz administered before and after the educational intervention. Comparison of the pretest knowledge scores within provider groups showed no statistically significant difference in baseline knowledge for the ST versus VC method. However, for all practitioners combined, the VC group scored significantly lower on the pretest than the ST group (p < 0.05). All three types of learners improved their knowledge scores following intervention. On average, MDs and NP/PAs correctly answered two to 3.5 more questions in the posttest. RNs showed the greatest improvements, correctly answering an average of four to five more questions following intervention. Improvement in knowledge scores between the two methods was statistically significant in favor of VC for the MDs (VC = 3.56 ± 1.92 vs. ST = 2.13 ± 1.89, p < 0.001) and all groups combined (VC 4.37 ± 1.92 vs ST 3.06 ± 1.89, p < 0.001). The results of this study indicate that VC is equivalent, if not better, than standard continuing medical education (CME). VC can potentially improve clinician education regarding the history, diagnosis, and management of HCV, thereby making a substantial impact on the clinical course of patients with this condition. In addition, VC has the potential to eliminate the financial and geographic barriers to professional education for rural practitioners.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447299160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447299160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/tmj.2006.0050

DO - 10.1089/tmj.2006.0050

M3 - Article

C2 - 17603829

AN - SCOPUS:34447299160

VL - 13

SP - 269

EP - 277

JO - Telemedicine and e-Health

JF - Telemedicine and e-Health

SN - 1530-5627

IS - 3

ER -