Healthcare providers' perspectives on expedited partner therapy for chlamydia: A qualitative study

Elian A. Rosenfeld, John Marx, Martha A. Terry, Ron Stall, Chelsea Pallatino, Elizabeth Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) effectively reduces rates of reinfection with chlamydia and increases the number of partners treated for the infection. Healthcare provider (HCP) provision of EPT is low. The objective of this qualitative study was to understand HCP views and opinions regarding the use of EPT in a state where EPT is permissible but underused. Methods: Using a purposive sampling strategy to include diverse HCPs who treat young women at risk for chlamydia, 23 semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted between October and December 2013. The interviews included questions about knowledge, attitudes, experiences with, and barriers and facilitators regarding the use of EPT. Results: Many respondents report using EPT and believe the practice is beneficial for their patients. Most providers were unaware of their colleagues' practices and had limited knowledge regarding institutional policies around EPT. HCPs noted a variety of barriers, such as fear of liability, confusion around the legal status of EPT and not being able to counsel patients' partners that make routine use of this practice a challenge. Facilitators of EPT include speaking on the phone with patients' partners and establishing legislation enabling EPT. Conclusions: This is the first study to qualitatively examine HCPs' perspectives on EPT in the USA. Barriers to EPT, including concerns about counselling patients' partners and the legal status of EPT, can be overcome. EPT recommendations could include the use of phone calls as part of their guidelines. Changing EPT legislation at the state level in the USA is an important factor to facilitate EPT use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-411
Number of pages5
JournalSexually Transmitted Infections
Volume91
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chlamydia
Health Personnel
Therapeutics
Jurisprudence
Legislation
Organizational Policy
Interviews
Confusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Healthcare providers' perspectives on expedited partner therapy for chlamydia : A qualitative study. / Rosenfeld, Elian A.; Marx, John; Terry, Martha A.; Stall, Ron; Pallatino, Chelsea; Miller, Elizabeth.

In: Sexually Transmitted Infections, Vol. 91, No. 6, 01.09.2015, p. 407-411.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosenfeld, Elian A. ; Marx, John ; Terry, Martha A. ; Stall, Ron ; Pallatino, Chelsea ; Miller, Elizabeth. / Healthcare providers' perspectives on expedited partner therapy for chlamydia : A qualitative study. In: Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2015 ; Vol. 91, No. 6. pp. 407-411.
@article{14c8d67c07734496918efdbedab3348d,
title = "Healthcare providers' perspectives on expedited partner therapy for chlamydia: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Objectives: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) effectively reduces rates of reinfection with chlamydia and increases the number of partners treated for the infection. Healthcare provider (HCP) provision of EPT is low. The objective of this qualitative study was to understand HCP views and opinions regarding the use of EPT in a state where EPT is permissible but underused. Methods: Using a purposive sampling strategy to include diverse HCPs who treat young women at risk for chlamydia, 23 semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted between October and December 2013. The interviews included questions about knowledge, attitudes, experiences with, and barriers and facilitators regarding the use of EPT. Results: Many respondents report using EPT and believe the practice is beneficial for their patients. Most providers were unaware of their colleagues' practices and had limited knowledge regarding institutional policies around EPT. HCPs noted a variety of barriers, such as fear of liability, confusion around the legal status of EPT and not being able to counsel patients' partners that make routine use of this practice a challenge. Facilitators of EPT include speaking on the phone with patients' partners and establishing legislation enabling EPT. Conclusions: This is the first study to qualitatively examine HCPs' perspectives on EPT in the USA. Barriers to EPT, including concerns about counselling patients' partners and the legal status of EPT, can be overcome. EPT recommendations could include the use of phone calls as part of their guidelines. Changing EPT legislation at the state level in the USA is an important factor to facilitate EPT use.",
author = "Rosenfeld, {Elian A.} and John Marx and Terry, {Martha A.} and Ron Stall and Chelsea Pallatino and Elizabeth Miller",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/sextrans-2014-051873",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "407--411",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Infections",
issn = "1368-4973",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Healthcare providers' perspectives on expedited partner therapy for chlamydia

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Rosenfeld, Elian A.

AU - Marx, John

AU - Terry, Martha A.

AU - Stall, Ron

AU - Pallatino, Chelsea

AU - Miller, Elizabeth

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Objectives: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) effectively reduces rates of reinfection with chlamydia and increases the number of partners treated for the infection. Healthcare provider (HCP) provision of EPT is low. The objective of this qualitative study was to understand HCP views and opinions regarding the use of EPT in a state where EPT is permissible but underused. Methods: Using a purposive sampling strategy to include diverse HCPs who treat young women at risk for chlamydia, 23 semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted between October and December 2013. The interviews included questions about knowledge, attitudes, experiences with, and barriers and facilitators regarding the use of EPT. Results: Many respondents report using EPT and believe the practice is beneficial for their patients. Most providers were unaware of their colleagues' practices and had limited knowledge regarding institutional policies around EPT. HCPs noted a variety of barriers, such as fear of liability, confusion around the legal status of EPT and not being able to counsel patients' partners that make routine use of this practice a challenge. Facilitators of EPT include speaking on the phone with patients' partners and establishing legislation enabling EPT. Conclusions: This is the first study to qualitatively examine HCPs' perspectives on EPT in the USA. Barriers to EPT, including concerns about counselling patients' partners and the legal status of EPT, can be overcome. EPT recommendations could include the use of phone calls as part of their guidelines. Changing EPT legislation at the state level in the USA is an important factor to facilitate EPT use.

AB - Objectives: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) effectively reduces rates of reinfection with chlamydia and increases the number of partners treated for the infection. Healthcare provider (HCP) provision of EPT is low. The objective of this qualitative study was to understand HCP views and opinions regarding the use of EPT in a state where EPT is permissible but underused. Methods: Using a purposive sampling strategy to include diverse HCPs who treat young women at risk for chlamydia, 23 semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted between October and December 2013. The interviews included questions about knowledge, attitudes, experiences with, and barriers and facilitators regarding the use of EPT. Results: Many respondents report using EPT and believe the practice is beneficial for their patients. Most providers were unaware of their colleagues' practices and had limited knowledge regarding institutional policies around EPT. HCPs noted a variety of barriers, such as fear of liability, confusion around the legal status of EPT and not being able to counsel patients' partners that make routine use of this practice a challenge. Facilitators of EPT include speaking on the phone with patients' partners and establishing legislation enabling EPT. Conclusions: This is the first study to qualitatively examine HCPs' perspectives on EPT in the USA. Barriers to EPT, including concerns about counselling patients' partners and the legal status of EPT, can be overcome. EPT recommendations could include the use of phone calls as part of their guidelines. Changing EPT legislation at the state level in the USA is an important factor to facilitate EPT use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940450589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940450589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051873

DO - 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051873

M3 - Article

C2 - 25792537

AN - SCOPUS:84940450589

VL - 91

SP - 407

EP - 411

JO - Sexually Transmitted Infections

JF - Sexually Transmitted Infections

SN - 1368-4973

IS - 6

ER -