Health Benefits Mandates and Their Potential Impacts on Racial/Ethnic Group Disparities in Insurance Markets

Shana Alex Charles, Ninez Ponce, Dominique Ritley, Sylvia Guendelman, Jennifer Kempster, John Lewis, Joy Melnikow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Addressing racial/ethnic group disparities in health insurance benefits through legislative mandates requires attention to the different proportions of racial/ethnic groups among insurance markets. This necessary baseline data, however, has proven difficult to measure. We applied racial/ethnic data from the 2009 California Health Interview Survey to the 2012 California Health Benefits Review Program Cost and Coverage Model to determine the racial/ethnic composition of ten health insurance market segments. We found disproportional representation of racial/ethnic groups by segment, thus affecting the health insurance impacts of benefit mandates. California’s Medicaid program is disproportionately Latino (60 % in Medi-Cal, compared to 39 % for the entire population), and the individual insurance market is disproportionately non-Latino white. Gender differences also exist. Mandates could unintentionally increase insurance coverage racial/ethnic disparities. Policymakers should consider the distribution of existing racial/ethnic disparities as criteria for legislative action on benefit mandates across health insurance markets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Immigrant and Minority Health
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 25 2016

Fingerprint

Insurance Benefits
Health Insurance
Insurance
Ethnic Groups
Insurance Coverage
Medicaid
Health Surveys
Hispanic Americans
Interviews
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population

Keywords

  • Benefit mandates
  • Health insurance
  • Racial/ethnic group disparities
  • State health policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Health Benefits Mandates and Their Potential Impacts on Racial/Ethnic Group Disparities in Insurance Markets. / Charles, Shana Alex; Ponce, Ninez; Ritley, Dominique; Guendelman, Sylvia; Kempster, Jennifer; Lewis, John; Melnikow, Joy.

In: Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 25.05.2016, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Charles, Shana Alex ; Ponce, Ninez ; Ritley, Dominique ; Guendelman, Sylvia ; Kempster, Jennifer ; Lewis, John ; Melnikow, Joy. / Health Benefits Mandates and Their Potential Impacts on Racial/Ethnic Group Disparities in Insurance Markets. In: Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2016 ; pp. 1-8.
@article{230e8428e30a4490bc8d47eb9405da21,
title = "Health Benefits Mandates and Their Potential Impacts on Racial/Ethnic Group Disparities in Insurance Markets",
abstract = "Addressing racial/ethnic group disparities in health insurance benefits through legislative mandates requires attention to the different proportions of racial/ethnic groups among insurance markets. This necessary baseline data, however, has proven difficult to measure. We applied racial/ethnic data from the 2009 California Health Interview Survey to the 2012 California Health Benefits Review Program Cost and Coverage Model to determine the racial/ethnic composition of ten health insurance market segments. We found disproportional representation of racial/ethnic groups by segment, thus affecting the health insurance impacts of benefit mandates. California’s Medicaid program is disproportionately Latino (60 {\%} in Medi-Cal, compared to 39 {\%} for the entire population), and the individual insurance market is disproportionately non-Latino white. Gender differences also exist. Mandates could unintentionally increase insurance coverage racial/ethnic disparities. Policymakers should consider the distribution of existing racial/ethnic disparities as criteria for legislative action on benefit mandates across health insurance markets.",
keywords = "Benefit mandates, Health insurance, Racial/ethnic group disparities, State health policy",
author = "Charles, {Shana Alex} and Ninez Ponce and Dominique Ritley and Sylvia Guendelman and Jennifer Kempster and John Lewis and Joy Melnikow",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1007/s10903-016-0436-9",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health",
issn = "1557-1912",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health Benefits Mandates and Their Potential Impacts on Racial/Ethnic Group Disparities in Insurance Markets

AU - Charles, Shana Alex

AU - Ponce, Ninez

AU - Ritley, Dominique

AU - Guendelman, Sylvia

AU - Kempster, Jennifer

AU - Lewis, John

AU - Melnikow, Joy

PY - 2016/5/25

Y1 - 2016/5/25

N2 - Addressing racial/ethnic group disparities in health insurance benefits through legislative mandates requires attention to the different proportions of racial/ethnic groups among insurance markets. This necessary baseline data, however, has proven difficult to measure. We applied racial/ethnic data from the 2009 California Health Interview Survey to the 2012 California Health Benefits Review Program Cost and Coverage Model to determine the racial/ethnic composition of ten health insurance market segments. We found disproportional representation of racial/ethnic groups by segment, thus affecting the health insurance impacts of benefit mandates. California’s Medicaid program is disproportionately Latino (60 % in Medi-Cal, compared to 39 % for the entire population), and the individual insurance market is disproportionately non-Latino white. Gender differences also exist. Mandates could unintentionally increase insurance coverage racial/ethnic disparities. Policymakers should consider the distribution of existing racial/ethnic disparities as criteria for legislative action on benefit mandates across health insurance markets.

AB - Addressing racial/ethnic group disparities in health insurance benefits through legislative mandates requires attention to the different proportions of racial/ethnic groups among insurance markets. This necessary baseline data, however, has proven difficult to measure. We applied racial/ethnic data from the 2009 California Health Interview Survey to the 2012 California Health Benefits Review Program Cost and Coverage Model to determine the racial/ethnic composition of ten health insurance market segments. We found disproportional representation of racial/ethnic groups by segment, thus affecting the health insurance impacts of benefit mandates. California’s Medicaid program is disproportionately Latino (60 % in Medi-Cal, compared to 39 % for the entire population), and the individual insurance market is disproportionately non-Latino white. Gender differences also exist. Mandates could unintentionally increase insurance coverage racial/ethnic disparities. Policymakers should consider the distribution of existing racial/ethnic disparities as criteria for legislative action on benefit mandates across health insurance markets.

KW - Benefit mandates

KW - Health insurance

KW - Racial/ethnic group disparities

KW - State health policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969963751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969963751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10903-016-0436-9

DO - 10.1007/s10903-016-0436-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 27225252

AN - SCOPUS:84969963751

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

JF - Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

SN - 1557-1912

ER -