Has electrical growth cone guidance found its potential?

Colin D. McCaig, Ann M. Rajnicek, Bing Song, Min Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

123 Scopus citations


Many neurobiologists spurn the existence and use of direct-current (DC) electric fields (EFs) in nervous system development and regeneration. This is despite direct measurement of EFs in embryos and adults, and evidence that EFs are required for normal development, dramatically influence the rate and direction of nerve growth in vitro, and promote nerve regeneration in vivo. The notion that growth cones use EFs as guidance cues was dismissed partly because there was no convincing evidence that naturally occurring EFs influence nerve growth at the single-cell level in vivo. Recent work indicates that growth cones can be guided by EFs in vivo and, intriguingly, that in vitro guidance by chemotropic gradients and EFs might invoke similar mechanisms. Ongoing clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of DC EFs in promoting the regeneration of human spinal cord could allow EFs to achieve their potential.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)354-359
Number of pages6
JournalTrends in Neurosciences
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Has electrical growth cone guidance found its potential?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this