Harnessing information technology to inform patients facing routine decisions: Cancer screening as a test case

Alex H. Krist, Steven H. Woolf, Camille Hochheimer, Roy T. Sabo, Paulette Kashiri, Resa M. Jones, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Rebecca S. Etz, Shin-Ping Tu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE Technology could transform routine decision making by anticipating patients’ information needs, assessing where patients are with decisions and preferences, personalizing educational experiences, facilitating patient-clinician information exchange, and supporting follow-up. This study evaluated whether patients and clinicians will use such a decision module and its impact on care, using 3 cancer screening decisions as test cases. METHODS Twelve practices with 55,453 patients using a patient portal participated in this prospective observational cohort study. Participation was open to patients who might face a cancer screening decision: women aged 40 to 49 who had not had a mammogram in 2 years, men aged 55 to 69 who had not had a prostate-specific antigen test in 2 years, and adults aged 50 to 74 overdue for colorectal cancer screening. Data sources included module responses, electronic health record data, and a postencounter survey. RESULTS In 1 year, one-fifth of the portal users (11,458 patients) faced a potential cancer screening decision. Among these patients, 20.6% started and 7.9% completed the decision module. Fully 47.2% of module completers shared responses with their clinician. After their next office visit, 57.8% of those surveyed thought their clinician had seen their responses, and many reported the module made their appointment more productive (40.7%), helped engage them in the decision (47.7%), broadened their knowledge (48.1%), and improved communication (37.5%). CONCLUSIONS Many patients face decisions that can be anticipated and proactively facilitated through technology. Although use of technology has the potential to make visits more efficient and effective, cultural, workflow, and technical changes are needed before it could be widely disseminated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-224
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Technology
Office Visits
Workflow
Electronic Health Records
Information Storage and Retrieval
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Observational Studies
Colorectal Neoplasms
Decision Making
Appointments and Schedules
Cohort Studies
Communication

Keywords

  • Computer-assisted
  • Decision making
  • Health information technology
  • Patient education
  • Practice-based research
  • Primary care
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Harnessing information technology to inform patients facing routine decisions : Cancer screening as a test case. / Krist, Alex H.; Woolf, Steven H.; Hochheimer, Camille; Sabo, Roy T.; Kashiri, Paulette; Jones, Resa M.; Lafata, Jennifer Elston; Etz, Rebecca S.; Tu, Shin-Ping.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.05.2017, p. 217-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krist, AH, Woolf, SH, Hochheimer, C, Sabo, RT, Kashiri, P, Jones, RM, Lafata, JE, Etz, RS & Tu, S-P 2017, 'Harnessing information technology to inform patients facing routine decisions: Cancer screening as a test case', Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2063
Krist, Alex H. ; Woolf, Steven H. ; Hochheimer, Camille ; Sabo, Roy T. ; Kashiri, Paulette ; Jones, Resa M. ; Lafata, Jennifer Elston ; Etz, Rebecca S. ; Tu, Shin-Ping. / Harnessing information technology to inform patients facing routine decisions : Cancer screening as a test case. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 217-224.
@article{f2ee17db9b6240ac81f81a1f65906148,
title = "Harnessing information technology to inform patients facing routine decisions: Cancer screening as a test case",
abstract = "PURPOSE Technology could transform routine decision making by anticipating patients’ information needs, assessing where patients are with decisions and preferences, personalizing educational experiences, facilitating patient-clinician information exchange, and supporting follow-up. This study evaluated whether patients and clinicians will use such a decision module and its impact on care, using 3 cancer screening decisions as test cases. METHODS Twelve practices with 55,453 patients using a patient portal participated in this prospective observational cohort study. Participation was open to patients who might face a cancer screening decision: women aged 40 to 49 who had not had a mammogram in 2 years, men aged 55 to 69 who had not had a prostate-specific antigen test in 2 years, and adults aged 50 to 74 overdue for colorectal cancer screening. Data sources included module responses, electronic health record data, and a postencounter survey. RESULTS In 1 year, one-fifth of the portal users (11,458 patients) faced a potential cancer screening decision. Among these patients, 20.6{\%} started and 7.9{\%} completed the decision module. Fully 47.2{\%} of module completers shared responses with their clinician. After their next office visit, 57.8{\%} of those surveyed thought their clinician had seen their responses, and many reported the module made their appointment more productive (40.7{\%}), helped engage them in the decision (47.7{\%}), broadened their knowledge (48.1{\%}), and improved communication (37.5{\%}). CONCLUSIONS Many patients face decisions that can be anticipated and proactively facilitated through technology. Although use of technology has the potential to make visits more efficient and effective, cultural, workflow, and technical changes are needed before it could be widely disseminated.",
keywords = "Computer-assisted, Decision making, Health information technology, Patient education, Practice-based research, Primary care, Screening",
author = "Krist, {Alex H.} and Woolf, {Steven H.} and Camille Hochheimer and Sabo, {Roy T.} and Paulette Kashiri and Jones, {Resa M.} and Lafata, {Jennifer Elston} and Etz, {Rebecca S.} and Shin-Ping Tu",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1370/afm.2063",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "217--224",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Harnessing information technology to inform patients facing routine decisions

T2 - Cancer screening as a test case

AU - Krist, Alex H.

AU - Woolf, Steven H.

AU - Hochheimer, Camille

AU - Sabo, Roy T.

AU - Kashiri, Paulette

AU - Jones, Resa M.

AU - Lafata, Jennifer Elston

AU - Etz, Rebecca S.

AU - Tu, Shin-Ping

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - PURPOSE Technology could transform routine decision making by anticipating patients’ information needs, assessing where patients are with decisions and preferences, personalizing educational experiences, facilitating patient-clinician information exchange, and supporting follow-up. This study evaluated whether patients and clinicians will use such a decision module and its impact on care, using 3 cancer screening decisions as test cases. METHODS Twelve practices with 55,453 patients using a patient portal participated in this prospective observational cohort study. Participation was open to patients who might face a cancer screening decision: women aged 40 to 49 who had not had a mammogram in 2 years, men aged 55 to 69 who had not had a prostate-specific antigen test in 2 years, and adults aged 50 to 74 overdue for colorectal cancer screening. Data sources included module responses, electronic health record data, and a postencounter survey. RESULTS In 1 year, one-fifth of the portal users (11,458 patients) faced a potential cancer screening decision. Among these patients, 20.6% started and 7.9% completed the decision module. Fully 47.2% of module completers shared responses with their clinician. After their next office visit, 57.8% of those surveyed thought their clinician had seen their responses, and many reported the module made their appointment more productive (40.7%), helped engage them in the decision (47.7%), broadened their knowledge (48.1%), and improved communication (37.5%). CONCLUSIONS Many patients face decisions that can be anticipated and proactively facilitated through technology. Although use of technology has the potential to make visits more efficient and effective, cultural, workflow, and technical changes are needed before it could be widely disseminated.

AB - PURPOSE Technology could transform routine decision making by anticipating patients’ information needs, assessing where patients are with decisions and preferences, personalizing educational experiences, facilitating patient-clinician information exchange, and supporting follow-up. This study evaluated whether patients and clinicians will use such a decision module and its impact on care, using 3 cancer screening decisions as test cases. METHODS Twelve practices with 55,453 patients using a patient portal participated in this prospective observational cohort study. Participation was open to patients who might face a cancer screening decision: women aged 40 to 49 who had not had a mammogram in 2 years, men aged 55 to 69 who had not had a prostate-specific antigen test in 2 years, and adults aged 50 to 74 overdue for colorectal cancer screening. Data sources included module responses, electronic health record data, and a postencounter survey. RESULTS In 1 year, one-fifth of the portal users (11,458 patients) faced a potential cancer screening decision. Among these patients, 20.6% started and 7.9% completed the decision module. Fully 47.2% of module completers shared responses with their clinician. After their next office visit, 57.8% of those surveyed thought their clinician had seen their responses, and many reported the module made their appointment more productive (40.7%), helped engage them in the decision (47.7%), broadened their knowledge (48.1%), and improved communication (37.5%). CONCLUSIONS Many patients face decisions that can be anticipated and proactively facilitated through technology. Although use of technology has the potential to make visits more efficient and effective, cultural, workflow, and technical changes are needed before it could be widely disseminated.

KW - Computer-assisted

KW - Decision making

KW - Health information technology

KW - Patient education

KW - Practice-based research

KW - Primary care

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019113285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019113285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.2063

DO - 10.1370/afm.2063

M3 - Article

C2 - 28483886

AN - SCOPUS:85019113285

VL - 15

SP - 217

EP - 224

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 3

ER -