Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs the open (flank incision) approach to radical nephrectomy

E. Busby, S. Das, H. S G Rao Tunuguntla, Christopher P Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome in contemporaneous groups of patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALRN) or open (flank) radical nephrectomy (ORN), as many series worldwide have confirmed the feasibility and advantages of LRN in managing renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 44 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for RCC from 1999 to 2001, 22 by HALRN and 22 by ORN, through an extraperitoneal 11th or 12th rib flank incision. Standard perioperative variables were assessed; a validated questionnaire was also sent to each patient after surgery, allowing them to report their overall satisfaction and the period needed for them to return to both routine, and full activities. The outcomes of HALRN and ORN were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between HALRN and ORN in operative duration, length of hospital stay, total narcotic requirement, pain scores at 1 week and 1 month after surgery, and the time to resume routine and full activity, with all variables (except operative duration) lower in the HALRN group. There were no significant differences between the groups in pain at 1-3 days, estimated blood loss or overall satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Compared with ORN, HALRN is associated with lower narcotic requirement, pain scores, a shorter hospital stay and earlier resumption of routine and full activities. However, several obstacles remain, including increased operative duration and the increased equipment costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-344
Number of pages4
JournalBJU International
Volume91
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2003

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Hand
Length of Stay
Narcotics
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Pain
Ribs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Flank nephrectomy
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • PneumoSleeve™
  • Renal tumours

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs the open (flank incision) approach to radical nephrectomy. / Busby, E.; Das, S.; Rao Tunuguntla, H. S G; Evans, Christopher P.

In: BJU International, Vol. 91, No. 4, 03.2003, p. 341-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Busby, E. ; Das, S. ; Rao Tunuguntla, H. S G ; Evans, Christopher P. / Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs the open (flank incision) approach to radical nephrectomy. In: BJU International. 2003 ; Vol. 91, No. 4. pp. 341-344.
@article{9f96eec9bd344197b1c472b6dc7b7b71,
title = "Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs the open (flank incision) approach to radical nephrectomy",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome in contemporaneous groups of patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALRN) or open (flank) radical nephrectomy (ORN), as many series worldwide have confirmed the feasibility and advantages of LRN in managing renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 44 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for RCC from 1999 to 2001, 22 by HALRN and 22 by ORN, through an extraperitoneal 11th or 12th rib flank incision. Standard perioperative variables were assessed; a validated questionnaire was also sent to each patient after surgery, allowing them to report their overall satisfaction and the period needed for them to return to both routine, and full activities. The outcomes of HALRN and ORN were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between HALRN and ORN in operative duration, length of hospital stay, total narcotic requirement, pain scores at 1 week and 1 month after surgery, and the time to resume routine and full activity, with all variables (except operative duration) lower in the HALRN group. There were no significant differences between the groups in pain at 1-3 days, estimated blood loss or overall satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Compared with ORN, HALRN is associated with lower narcotic requirement, pain scores, a shorter hospital stay and earlier resumption of routine and full activities. However, several obstacles remain, including increased operative duration and the increased equipment costs.",
keywords = "Flank nephrectomy, Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, Laparoscopic surgery, PneumoSleeve™, Renal tumours",
author = "E. Busby and S. Das and {Rao Tunuguntla}, {H. S G} and Evans, {Christopher P}",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04089.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "341--344",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs the open (flank incision) approach to radical nephrectomy

AU - Busby, E.

AU - Das, S.

AU - Rao Tunuguntla, H. S G

AU - Evans, Christopher P

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome in contemporaneous groups of patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALRN) or open (flank) radical nephrectomy (ORN), as many series worldwide have confirmed the feasibility and advantages of LRN in managing renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 44 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for RCC from 1999 to 2001, 22 by HALRN and 22 by ORN, through an extraperitoneal 11th or 12th rib flank incision. Standard perioperative variables were assessed; a validated questionnaire was also sent to each patient after surgery, allowing them to report their overall satisfaction and the period needed for them to return to both routine, and full activities. The outcomes of HALRN and ORN were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between HALRN and ORN in operative duration, length of hospital stay, total narcotic requirement, pain scores at 1 week and 1 month after surgery, and the time to resume routine and full activity, with all variables (except operative duration) lower in the HALRN group. There were no significant differences between the groups in pain at 1-3 days, estimated blood loss or overall satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Compared with ORN, HALRN is associated with lower narcotic requirement, pain scores, a shorter hospital stay and earlier resumption of routine and full activities. However, several obstacles remain, including increased operative duration and the increased equipment costs.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome in contemporaneous groups of patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALRN) or open (flank) radical nephrectomy (ORN), as many series worldwide have confirmed the feasibility and advantages of LRN in managing renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 44 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for RCC from 1999 to 2001, 22 by HALRN and 22 by ORN, through an extraperitoneal 11th or 12th rib flank incision. Standard perioperative variables were assessed; a validated questionnaire was also sent to each patient after surgery, allowing them to report their overall satisfaction and the period needed for them to return to both routine, and full activities. The outcomes of HALRN and ORN were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between HALRN and ORN in operative duration, length of hospital stay, total narcotic requirement, pain scores at 1 week and 1 month after surgery, and the time to resume routine and full activity, with all variables (except operative duration) lower in the HALRN group. There were no significant differences between the groups in pain at 1-3 days, estimated blood loss or overall satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Compared with ORN, HALRN is associated with lower narcotic requirement, pain scores, a shorter hospital stay and earlier resumption of routine and full activities. However, several obstacles remain, including increased operative duration and the increased equipment costs.

KW - Flank nephrectomy

KW - Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

KW - PneumoSleeve™

KW - Renal tumours

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037349770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037349770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04089.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04089.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 12603411

AN - SCOPUS:0037349770

VL - 91

SP - 341

EP - 344

JO - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 4

ER -