Giving bad news: The family perspective

Gregory Jurkovich, Becky Pierce, Laura Pananen, Frederick P. Rivara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Death from trauma frequently comes without forewarning. Relating the news of death to the family is often the responsibility of trauma surgeons. The purpose of this study was to investigate the key characteristics and methods of delivering bad news from the perspective of surviving family members. Methods: We designed and administered a survey tool to surviving family members of trauma patients dying in the emergency department or intensive care unit. The tool consisted of 14 elements that surviving family members graded in importance when receiving bad news (1, least; 6, most). Respondents also judged the attention given to these elements (good, fair, or poor) by the person giving the bad news of death. Results: Fifty-four family members of 48 patients who died completed the survey (44 intensive care unit deaths, 4 emergency room deaths). Deceased patients ranged in age from 12 to 91 years (mean, 53 years). Death occurred within 2 days of injury in 69% of the patients and within 1 week in 83%. The most important features of delivering bad news were judged to be attitude of the news-giver (ranked most important by 72%), clarity of the message (70%), privacy (65%), and knowledge/ability to answer questions (57%). The attire of the news-giver ranked as least important (3%). Sympathy, time for questions, and location of the conversation were ranked of intermediate importance. Touching was unwanted by 30% of the respondents, but encouraged or acceptable in 24%. Conclusion: The attitude of the news-giver, combined with clarity of the message and the time, privacy, and knowledge to answer questions are the most important aspects of giving bad news. This information should be incorporated into resident training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)865-873
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Privacy
Wounds and Injuries
Intensive Care Units
Hospital Emergency Service
Aptitude
Emergency Medical Services
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Death
  • Ethics
  • Medical
  • Physician-patient relations
  • Trauma
  • Wounds and injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Giving bad news : The family perspective. / Jurkovich, Gregory; Pierce, Becky; Pananen, Laura; Rivara, Frederick P.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 48, No. 5, 01.01.2000, p. 865-873.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jurkovich, Gregory ; Pierce, Becky ; Pananen, Laura ; Rivara, Frederick P. / Giving bad news : The family perspective. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2000 ; Vol. 48, No. 5. pp. 865-873.
@article{1167ce8dfe3d47d0955b4812a2396997,
title = "Giving bad news: The family perspective",
abstract = "Background: Death from trauma frequently comes without forewarning. Relating the news of death to the family is often the responsibility of trauma surgeons. The purpose of this study was to investigate the key characteristics and methods of delivering bad news from the perspective of surviving family members. Methods: We designed and administered a survey tool to surviving family members of trauma patients dying in the emergency department or intensive care unit. The tool consisted of 14 elements that surviving family members graded in importance when receiving bad news (1, least; 6, most). Respondents also judged the attention given to these elements (good, fair, or poor) by the person giving the bad news of death. Results: Fifty-four family members of 48 patients who died completed the survey (44 intensive care unit deaths, 4 emergency room deaths). Deceased patients ranged in age from 12 to 91 years (mean, 53 years). Death occurred within 2 days of injury in 69{\%} of the patients and within 1 week in 83{\%}. The most important features of delivering bad news were judged to be attitude of the news-giver (ranked most important by 72{\%}), clarity of the message (70{\%}), privacy (65{\%}), and knowledge/ability to answer questions (57{\%}). The attire of the news-giver ranked as least important (3{\%}). Sympathy, time for questions, and location of the conversation were ranked of intermediate importance. Touching was unwanted by 30{\%} of the respondents, but encouraged or acceptable in 24{\%}. Conclusion: The attitude of the news-giver, combined with clarity of the message and the time, privacy, and knowledge to answer questions are the most important aspects of giving bad news. This information should be incorporated into resident training.",
keywords = "Communication, Death, Ethics, Medical, Physician-patient relations, Trauma, Wounds and injuries",
author = "Gregory Jurkovich and Becky Pierce and Laura Pananen and Rivara, {Frederick P.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005373-200005000-00009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "865--873",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Giving bad news

T2 - The family perspective

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Pierce, Becky

AU - Pananen, Laura

AU - Rivara, Frederick P.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Background: Death from trauma frequently comes without forewarning. Relating the news of death to the family is often the responsibility of trauma surgeons. The purpose of this study was to investigate the key characteristics and methods of delivering bad news from the perspective of surviving family members. Methods: We designed and administered a survey tool to surviving family members of trauma patients dying in the emergency department or intensive care unit. The tool consisted of 14 elements that surviving family members graded in importance when receiving bad news (1, least; 6, most). Respondents also judged the attention given to these elements (good, fair, or poor) by the person giving the bad news of death. Results: Fifty-four family members of 48 patients who died completed the survey (44 intensive care unit deaths, 4 emergency room deaths). Deceased patients ranged in age from 12 to 91 years (mean, 53 years). Death occurred within 2 days of injury in 69% of the patients and within 1 week in 83%. The most important features of delivering bad news were judged to be attitude of the news-giver (ranked most important by 72%), clarity of the message (70%), privacy (65%), and knowledge/ability to answer questions (57%). The attire of the news-giver ranked as least important (3%). Sympathy, time for questions, and location of the conversation were ranked of intermediate importance. Touching was unwanted by 30% of the respondents, but encouraged or acceptable in 24%. Conclusion: The attitude of the news-giver, combined with clarity of the message and the time, privacy, and knowledge to answer questions are the most important aspects of giving bad news. This information should be incorporated into resident training.

AB - Background: Death from trauma frequently comes without forewarning. Relating the news of death to the family is often the responsibility of trauma surgeons. The purpose of this study was to investigate the key characteristics and methods of delivering bad news from the perspective of surviving family members. Methods: We designed and administered a survey tool to surviving family members of trauma patients dying in the emergency department or intensive care unit. The tool consisted of 14 elements that surviving family members graded in importance when receiving bad news (1, least; 6, most). Respondents also judged the attention given to these elements (good, fair, or poor) by the person giving the bad news of death. Results: Fifty-four family members of 48 patients who died completed the survey (44 intensive care unit deaths, 4 emergency room deaths). Deceased patients ranged in age from 12 to 91 years (mean, 53 years). Death occurred within 2 days of injury in 69% of the patients and within 1 week in 83%. The most important features of delivering bad news were judged to be attitude of the news-giver (ranked most important by 72%), clarity of the message (70%), privacy (65%), and knowledge/ability to answer questions (57%). The attire of the news-giver ranked as least important (3%). Sympathy, time for questions, and location of the conversation were ranked of intermediate importance. Touching was unwanted by 30% of the respondents, but encouraged or acceptable in 24%. Conclusion: The attitude of the news-giver, combined with clarity of the message and the time, privacy, and knowledge to answer questions are the most important aspects of giving bad news. This information should be incorporated into resident training.

KW - Communication

KW - Death

KW - Ethics

KW - Medical

KW - Physician-patient relations

KW - Trauma

KW - Wounds and injuries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033934276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033934276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005373-200005000-00009

DO - 10.1097/00005373-200005000-00009

M3 - Article

C2 - 10823529

AN - SCOPUS:0033934276

VL - 48

SP - 865

EP - 873

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -