Geographic variation of racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer testing among medicare enrollees

Thomas Semrad, Daniel J Tancredi, Laura Mae Baldwin, Pamela Green, Joshua J Fenton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Medicare population has documented racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but it is unknown whether these disparities differ across geographic regions. Methods: Among Medicare enrollees within 8 US states, we ascertained up-to-date CRC screening on December 31, 2003 (fecal occult blood testing in the prior year or sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in the prior 5 years). Logistic regression models tested for regional variation in up-to-date status among white versus different nonwhite populations (blacks, Asian/Pacific Islanders [APIs], Hispanics). We estimated regression-adjusted region-specific prevalence of up-to-date status by race/ethnicity and compared adjusted white versus nonwhite up-to-date prevalence across regions by using generalized least squares regression. Results: White versus nonwhite up-to-date status varied significantly across regions for blacks (P =.01) and APIs (P <.001) but not Hispanics (P =.62). Whereas the white versus black differences in proportion up-to-date were greatest in Atlanta (Georgia), rural Georgia, and the San Francisco Bay Area of California (range, 10%-16% differences, blacks<whites); there were no significant white versus black differences in Connecticut, Seattle (Washington) or Iowa. Whereas APIs had significantly lower up-to-date prevalence than whites in Michigan and the California regions of San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Jose (range, 4%-15% differences, APIs<whites), APIs in Hawaii had higher up-to-date status than whites (52% vs 38% P <.001). White versus Hispanic differences were substantial but homogeneous across regions (range, 8%-16% differences, Hispanics<whites). In contrast to nonwhites, there was little geographic variation in up-to-date status among whites. Conclusions: Significant geographic variation in up-to-date status among black and API Medicare enrollees is associated with heterogeneous racial/ethnic disparities for these groups across US regions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1755-1763
Number of pages9
JournalCancer
Volume117
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2011

Fingerprint

Medicare
Colorectal Neoplasms
Hispanic Americans
San Francisco
Early Detection of Cancer
Logistic Models
Sigmoidoscopy
Occult Blood
Los Angeles
Colonoscopy
Least-Squares Analysis
Ethnic Groups
Population

Keywords

  • cancer screening
  • colorectal cancer
  • disparities
  • geography of health
  • Medicare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Geographic variation of racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer testing among medicare enrollees. / Semrad, Thomas; Tancredi, Daniel J; Baldwin, Laura Mae; Green, Pamela; Fenton, Joshua J.

In: Cancer, Vol. 117, No. 8, 15.04.2011, p. 1755-1763.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d8bad318e2fd4913a3725e48b00379a0,
title = "Geographic variation of racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer testing among medicare enrollees",
abstract = "Background: The Medicare population has documented racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but it is unknown whether these disparities differ across geographic regions. Methods: Among Medicare enrollees within 8 US states, we ascertained up-to-date CRC screening on December 31, 2003 (fecal occult blood testing in the prior year or sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in the prior 5 years). Logistic regression models tested for regional variation in up-to-date status among white versus different nonwhite populations (blacks, Asian/Pacific Islanders [APIs], Hispanics). We estimated regression-adjusted region-specific prevalence of up-to-date status by race/ethnicity and compared adjusted white versus nonwhite up-to-date prevalence across regions by using generalized least squares regression. Results: White versus nonwhite up-to-date status varied significantly across regions for blacks (P =.01) and APIs (P <.001) but not Hispanics (P =.62). Whereas the white versus black differences in proportion up-to-date were greatest in Atlanta (Georgia), rural Georgia, and the San Francisco Bay Area of California (range, 10{\%}-16{\%} differences, blacks",
keywords = "cancer screening, colorectal cancer, disparities, geography of health, Medicare",
author = "Thomas Semrad and Tancredi, {Daniel J} and Baldwin, {Laura Mae} and Pamela Green and Fenton, {Joshua J}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/cncr.25668",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "1755--1763",
journal = "Cancer",
issn = "0008-543X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geographic variation of racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer testing among medicare enrollees

AU - Semrad, Thomas

AU - Tancredi, Daniel J

AU - Baldwin, Laura Mae

AU - Green, Pamela

AU - Fenton, Joshua J

PY - 2011/4/15

Y1 - 2011/4/15

N2 - Background: The Medicare population has documented racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but it is unknown whether these disparities differ across geographic regions. Methods: Among Medicare enrollees within 8 US states, we ascertained up-to-date CRC screening on December 31, 2003 (fecal occult blood testing in the prior year or sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in the prior 5 years). Logistic regression models tested for regional variation in up-to-date status among white versus different nonwhite populations (blacks, Asian/Pacific Islanders [APIs], Hispanics). We estimated regression-adjusted region-specific prevalence of up-to-date status by race/ethnicity and compared adjusted white versus nonwhite up-to-date prevalence across regions by using generalized least squares regression. Results: White versus nonwhite up-to-date status varied significantly across regions for blacks (P =.01) and APIs (P <.001) but not Hispanics (P =.62). Whereas the white versus black differences in proportion up-to-date were greatest in Atlanta (Georgia), rural Georgia, and the San Francisco Bay Area of California (range, 10%-16% differences, blacks

AB - Background: The Medicare population has documented racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but it is unknown whether these disparities differ across geographic regions. Methods: Among Medicare enrollees within 8 US states, we ascertained up-to-date CRC screening on December 31, 2003 (fecal occult blood testing in the prior year or sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in the prior 5 years). Logistic regression models tested for regional variation in up-to-date status among white versus different nonwhite populations (blacks, Asian/Pacific Islanders [APIs], Hispanics). We estimated regression-adjusted region-specific prevalence of up-to-date status by race/ethnicity and compared adjusted white versus nonwhite up-to-date prevalence across regions by using generalized least squares regression. Results: White versus nonwhite up-to-date status varied significantly across regions for blacks (P =.01) and APIs (P <.001) but not Hispanics (P =.62). Whereas the white versus black differences in proportion up-to-date were greatest in Atlanta (Georgia), rural Georgia, and the San Francisco Bay Area of California (range, 10%-16% differences, blacks

KW - cancer screening

KW - colorectal cancer

KW - disparities

KW - geography of health

KW - Medicare

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953793593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953793593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cncr.25668

DO - 10.1002/cncr.25668

M3 - Article

C2 - 21472723

AN - SCOPUS:79953793593

VL - 117

SP - 1755

EP - 1763

JO - Cancer

JF - Cancer

SN - 0008-543X

IS - 8

ER -