Genetic outcomes of translocation of bighorn sheep in Arizona

Daphne A. Gille, Michael R. Buchalski, Dave Conrad, Esther S. Rubin, Amber Munig, Brian F. Wakeling, Clinton W. Epps, Tyler G. Creech, Rachel Crowhurst, Brandon Holton, Ryan Monello, Walter M Boyce, Cecilia Penedo, Holly B Ernest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Translocation is an important management tool that has been used for >50 years in Arizona, USA, to increase bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) population densities and to restore herds to suitable habitat throughout their historical range. Yet, translocation can also alter the underlying genetic diversity and spatial structure of managed wildlife species in beneficial or detrimental ways. To evaluate the long-term effect of translocation actions on bighorn sheep, we characterized statewide genetic structure and diversity using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA data in 16 indigenous and translocated (supplemented or reintroduced) Arizona populations sampled between 2005 and 2012. Populations that were recipients of translocated animals showed no reduction in genetic diversity with allelic richness and heterozygosity estimates equivalent to, and in some cases greater than, indigenous source populations. The indigenous population occupying the Silver Bell Mountains population displayed the lowest indices of genetic diversity but shared mitochondrial DNA haplotypes with the Mohawk Mountains, Sierra Pinta, and Cabeza Prieta populations, indicating past connectivity and potential opportunities for genetic management if warranted. Bayesian clustering on genetic similarity and genetic divergence estimates corroborated previous work differentiating Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (O. c. canadensis) and 2 desert lineages corresponding with Nelson's (O. c. nelsoni) and Mexican desert bighorn sheep (O. c. mexicana). In northern Arizona, assignment tests confirmed the presence of 2 indigenous metapopulations of Nelson's desert bighorn sheep in the Black Mountains and Grand Canyon and indicated that gene flow from the Grand Canyon population has likely played a role in maintaining genetic diversity and mitigating founder effects among multiple translocated populations in the area. In southern Arizona, we detected genetic structure consistent with 2 metapopulations of Mexican desert bighorn sheep representing a departure from current management practices that consider this lineage to be a single genetic unit. Several lines of genetic evidence presented in this study suggest that the Bill Williams River area is the contemporary contact zone for the 2 desert lineages; however, the degree to which translocation has enhanced introgression is unknown. Despite relative isolation from other herds, the translocated Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep population in eastern Arizona had high levels of allelic richness and heterozygosity and a negative inbreeding coefficient, conceivably as a result of multiple translocation events from sources in Colorado and New Mexico, USA. Although translocation management has successfully contributed to the reestablishment of bighorn sheep populations in Arizona without diminishing genetic diversity, future translocation should proceed with caution to preserve the genetic integrity and potential local adaptation within the Nelson's and Mexican desert bighorn sheep metapopulations identified in this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Ovis canadensis
sheep
translocation
deserts
desert
genetic variation
metapopulation
mountain
Rocky Mountain region
mountains
canyons
heterozygosity
mitochondrial DNA
genetic structure
canyon
herds
founder effect
indigenous population
local adaptation
contact zone

Keywords

  • Arizona
  • bighorn sheep
  • genetic diversity
  • management
  • microsatellite
  • mitochondrial DNA
  • Ovis canadensis
  • translocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Gille, D. A., Buchalski, M. R., Conrad, D., Rubin, E. S., Munig, A., Wakeling, B. F., ... Ernest, H. B. (2019). Genetic outcomes of translocation of bighorn sheep in Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21653

Genetic outcomes of translocation of bighorn sheep in Arizona. / Gille, Daphne A.; Buchalski, Michael R.; Conrad, Dave; Rubin, Esther S.; Munig, Amber; Wakeling, Brian F.; Epps, Clinton W.; Creech, Tyler G.; Crowhurst, Rachel; Holton, Brandon; Monello, Ryan; Boyce, Walter M; Penedo, Cecilia; Ernest, Holly B.

In: Journal of Wildlife Management, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gille, DA, Buchalski, MR, Conrad, D, Rubin, ES, Munig, A, Wakeling, BF, Epps, CW, Creech, TG, Crowhurst, R, Holton, B, Monello, R, Boyce, WM, Penedo, C & Ernest, HB 2019, 'Genetic outcomes of translocation of bighorn sheep in Arizona', Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21653
Gille DA, Buchalski MR, Conrad D, Rubin ES, Munig A, Wakeling BF et al. Genetic outcomes of translocation of bighorn sheep in Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management. 2019 Jan 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21653
Gille, Daphne A. ; Buchalski, Michael R. ; Conrad, Dave ; Rubin, Esther S. ; Munig, Amber ; Wakeling, Brian F. ; Epps, Clinton W. ; Creech, Tyler G. ; Crowhurst, Rachel ; Holton, Brandon ; Monello, Ryan ; Boyce, Walter M ; Penedo, Cecilia ; Ernest, Holly B. / Genetic outcomes of translocation of bighorn sheep in Arizona. In: Journal of Wildlife Management. 2019.
@article{c34129ba45b84253a20fd9d3114098ef,
title = "Genetic outcomes of translocation of bighorn sheep in Arizona",
abstract = "Translocation is an important management tool that has been used for >50 years in Arizona, USA, to increase bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) population densities and to restore herds to suitable habitat throughout their historical range. Yet, translocation can also alter the underlying genetic diversity and spatial structure of managed wildlife species in beneficial or detrimental ways. To evaluate the long-term effect of translocation actions on bighorn sheep, we characterized statewide genetic structure and diversity using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA data in 16 indigenous and translocated (supplemented or reintroduced) Arizona populations sampled between 2005 and 2012. Populations that were recipients of translocated animals showed no reduction in genetic diversity with allelic richness and heterozygosity estimates equivalent to, and in some cases greater than, indigenous source populations. The indigenous population occupying the Silver Bell Mountains population displayed the lowest indices of genetic diversity but shared mitochondrial DNA haplotypes with the Mohawk Mountains, Sierra Pinta, and Cabeza Prieta populations, indicating past connectivity and potential opportunities for genetic management if warranted. Bayesian clustering on genetic similarity and genetic divergence estimates corroborated previous work differentiating Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (O. c. canadensis) and 2 desert lineages corresponding with Nelson's (O. c. nelsoni) and Mexican desert bighorn sheep (O. c. mexicana). In northern Arizona, assignment tests confirmed the presence of 2 indigenous metapopulations of Nelson's desert bighorn sheep in the Black Mountains and Grand Canyon and indicated that gene flow from the Grand Canyon population has likely played a role in maintaining genetic diversity and mitigating founder effects among multiple translocated populations in the area. In southern Arizona, we detected genetic structure consistent with 2 metapopulations of Mexican desert bighorn sheep representing a departure from current management practices that consider this lineage to be a single genetic unit. Several lines of genetic evidence presented in this study suggest that the Bill Williams River area is the contemporary contact zone for the 2 desert lineages; however, the degree to which translocation has enhanced introgression is unknown. Despite relative isolation from other herds, the translocated Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep population in eastern Arizona had high levels of allelic richness and heterozygosity and a negative inbreeding coefficient, conceivably as a result of multiple translocation events from sources in Colorado and New Mexico, USA. Although translocation management has successfully contributed to the reestablishment of bighorn sheep populations in Arizona without diminishing genetic diversity, future translocation should proceed with caution to preserve the genetic integrity and potential local adaptation within the Nelson's and Mexican desert bighorn sheep metapopulations identified in this study.",
keywords = "Arizona, bighorn sheep, genetic diversity, management, microsatellite, mitochondrial DNA, Ovis canadensis, translocation",
author = "Gille, {Daphne A.} and Buchalski, {Michael R.} and Dave Conrad and Rubin, {Esther S.} and Amber Munig and Wakeling, {Brian F.} and Epps, {Clinton W.} and Creech, {Tyler G.} and Rachel Crowhurst and Brandon Holton and Ryan Monello and Boyce, {Walter M} and Cecilia Penedo and Ernest, {Holly B}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jwmg.21653",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Management",
issn = "0022-541X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic outcomes of translocation of bighorn sheep in Arizona

AU - Gille, Daphne A.

AU - Buchalski, Michael R.

AU - Conrad, Dave

AU - Rubin, Esther S.

AU - Munig, Amber

AU - Wakeling, Brian F.

AU - Epps, Clinton W.

AU - Creech, Tyler G.

AU - Crowhurst, Rachel

AU - Holton, Brandon

AU - Monello, Ryan

AU - Boyce, Walter M

AU - Penedo, Cecilia

AU - Ernest, Holly B

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Translocation is an important management tool that has been used for >50 years in Arizona, USA, to increase bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) population densities and to restore herds to suitable habitat throughout their historical range. Yet, translocation can also alter the underlying genetic diversity and spatial structure of managed wildlife species in beneficial or detrimental ways. To evaluate the long-term effect of translocation actions on bighorn sheep, we characterized statewide genetic structure and diversity using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA data in 16 indigenous and translocated (supplemented or reintroduced) Arizona populations sampled between 2005 and 2012. Populations that were recipients of translocated animals showed no reduction in genetic diversity with allelic richness and heterozygosity estimates equivalent to, and in some cases greater than, indigenous source populations. The indigenous population occupying the Silver Bell Mountains population displayed the lowest indices of genetic diversity but shared mitochondrial DNA haplotypes with the Mohawk Mountains, Sierra Pinta, and Cabeza Prieta populations, indicating past connectivity and potential opportunities for genetic management if warranted. Bayesian clustering on genetic similarity and genetic divergence estimates corroborated previous work differentiating Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (O. c. canadensis) and 2 desert lineages corresponding with Nelson's (O. c. nelsoni) and Mexican desert bighorn sheep (O. c. mexicana). In northern Arizona, assignment tests confirmed the presence of 2 indigenous metapopulations of Nelson's desert bighorn sheep in the Black Mountains and Grand Canyon and indicated that gene flow from the Grand Canyon population has likely played a role in maintaining genetic diversity and mitigating founder effects among multiple translocated populations in the area. In southern Arizona, we detected genetic structure consistent with 2 metapopulations of Mexican desert bighorn sheep representing a departure from current management practices that consider this lineage to be a single genetic unit. Several lines of genetic evidence presented in this study suggest that the Bill Williams River area is the contemporary contact zone for the 2 desert lineages; however, the degree to which translocation has enhanced introgression is unknown. Despite relative isolation from other herds, the translocated Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep population in eastern Arizona had high levels of allelic richness and heterozygosity and a negative inbreeding coefficient, conceivably as a result of multiple translocation events from sources in Colorado and New Mexico, USA. Although translocation management has successfully contributed to the reestablishment of bighorn sheep populations in Arizona without diminishing genetic diversity, future translocation should proceed with caution to preserve the genetic integrity and potential local adaptation within the Nelson's and Mexican desert bighorn sheep metapopulations identified in this study.

AB - Translocation is an important management tool that has been used for >50 years in Arizona, USA, to increase bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) population densities and to restore herds to suitable habitat throughout their historical range. Yet, translocation can also alter the underlying genetic diversity and spatial structure of managed wildlife species in beneficial or detrimental ways. To evaluate the long-term effect of translocation actions on bighorn sheep, we characterized statewide genetic structure and diversity using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA data in 16 indigenous and translocated (supplemented or reintroduced) Arizona populations sampled between 2005 and 2012. Populations that were recipients of translocated animals showed no reduction in genetic diversity with allelic richness and heterozygosity estimates equivalent to, and in some cases greater than, indigenous source populations. The indigenous population occupying the Silver Bell Mountains population displayed the lowest indices of genetic diversity but shared mitochondrial DNA haplotypes with the Mohawk Mountains, Sierra Pinta, and Cabeza Prieta populations, indicating past connectivity and potential opportunities for genetic management if warranted. Bayesian clustering on genetic similarity and genetic divergence estimates corroborated previous work differentiating Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (O. c. canadensis) and 2 desert lineages corresponding with Nelson's (O. c. nelsoni) and Mexican desert bighorn sheep (O. c. mexicana). In northern Arizona, assignment tests confirmed the presence of 2 indigenous metapopulations of Nelson's desert bighorn sheep in the Black Mountains and Grand Canyon and indicated that gene flow from the Grand Canyon population has likely played a role in maintaining genetic diversity and mitigating founder effects among multiple translocated populations in the area. In southern Arizona, we detected genetic structure consistent with 2 metapopulations of Mexican desert bighorn sheep representing a departure from current management practices that consider this lineage to be a single genetic unit. Several lines of genetic evidence presented in this study suggest that the Bill Williams River area is the contemporary contact zone for the 2 desert lineages; however, the degree to which translocation has enhanced introgression is unknown. Despite relative isolation from other herds, the translocated Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep population in eastern Arizona had high levels of allelic richness and heterozygosity and a negative inbreeding coefficient, conceivably as a result of multiple translocation events from sources in Colorado and New Mexico, USA. Although translocation management has successfully contributed to the reestablishment of bighorn sheep populations in Arizona without diminishing genetic diversity, future translocation should proceed with caution to preserve the genetic integrity and potential local adaptation within the Nelson's and Mexican desert bighorn sheep metapopulations identified in this study.

KW - Arizona

KW - bighorn sheep

KW - genetic diversity

KW - management

KW - microsatellite

KW - mitochondrial DNA

KW - Ovis canadensis

KW - translocation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062558157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062558157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jwmg.21653

DO - 10.1002/jwmg.21653

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062558157

JO - Journal of Wildlife Management

JF - Journal of Wildlife Management

SN - 0022-541X

ER -