Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs

Vahdettin Altunok, Evren Koban, Lounès Chikhi, Alison Schaffer, Niels C Pedersen, Mehmet Nizamlioǧlu, Inci Togan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The genetic diversity of Kangal dogs (n=23) was analysed using 100 canine microsatellites, and the results were compared to Central Anatolian feral dogs (n=51), Akbash dogs (n=6), and Turkish greyhounds (TG, n=3). The Kangal, Akbash, Turkish greyhound and feral dogs were found to be significantly different from each other by FST measure. Factorial Correspondence Analysis (FCA), which evaluated the span of genotypic variation between individual dogs, yielded 4 distinct groups of the animals. Group I was composed of 12 pure Kangal dogs (Kangal I) without the Kangal looking hybrids of Kangals and feral dogs. Group II contained the remaining 11 Kangal dogs (Kangal II), 1 Turkish greyhound, and all feral dogs except for one. Group III was comprised of the remaining 2 Turkish greyhounds, while Group IV consisted of all of the Akbash dogs. Kangal I, Akbash and Turkish greyhound groups were scattered in different parts of the three-dimensional FCA plot. We conclude that Kangal dogs are genetically distinct and hence they deserve to be identified as a breed. Furthermore, it has been observed that microsatellites can be employed in the conservation efforts of Kangals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-254
Number of pages6
JournalBulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy
Volume49
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Dogs
dogs
Greyhound
Microsatellite Repeats
microsatellite repeats
Canidae
breeds
feral
genetic variation

Keywords

  • Dogs
  • Genetic variability
  • Microsatellites
  • Population genetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Altunok, V., Koban, E., Chikhi, L., Schaffer, A., Pedersen, N. C., Nizamlioǧlu, M., & Togan, I. (2005). Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, 49(2), 249-254.

Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs. / Altunok, Vahdettin; Koban, Evren; Chikhi, Lounès; Schaffer, Alison; Pedersen, Niels C; Nizamlioǧlu, Mehmet; Togan, Inci.

In: Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2005, p. 249-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Altunok, V, Koban, E, Chikhi, L, Schaffer, A, Pedersen, NC, Nizamlioǧlu, M & Togan, I 2005, 'Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs', Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 249-254.
Altunok V, Koban E, Chikhi L, Schaffer A, Pedersen NC, Nizamlioǧlu M et al. Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy. 2005;49(2):249-254.
Altunok, Vahdettin ; Koban, Evren ; Chikhi, Lounès ; Schaffer, Alison ; Pedersen, Niels C ; Nizamlioǧlu, Mehmet ; Togan, Inci. / Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs. In: Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy. 2005 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 249-254.
@article{9fb35dfb533649aab2a56ec188799eb8,
title = "Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs",
abstract = "The genetic diversity of Kangal dogs (n=23) was analysed using 100 canine microsatellites, and the results were compared to Central Anatolian feral dogs (n=51), Akbash dogs (n=6), and Turkish greyhounds (TG, n=3). The Kangal, Akbash, Turkish greyhound and feral dogs were found to be significantly different from each other by FST measure. Factorial Correspondence Analysis (FCA), which evaluated the span of genotypic variation between individual dogs, yielded 4 distinct groups of the animals. Group I was composed of 12 pure Kangal dogs (Kangal I) without the Kangal looking hybrids of Kangals and feral dogs. Group II contained the remaining 11 Kangal dogs (Kangal II), 1 Turkish greyhound, and all feral dogs except for one. Group III was comprised of the remaining 2 Turkish greyhounds, while Group IV consisted of all of the Akbash dogs. Kangal I, Akbash and Turkish greyhound groups were scattered in different parts of the three-dimensional FCA plot. We conclude that Kangal dogs are genetically distinct and hence they deserve to be identified as a breed. Furthermore, it has been observed that microsatellites can be employed in the conservation efforts of Kangals.",
keywords = "Dogs, Genetic variability, Microsatellites, Population genetics",
author = "Vahdettin Altunok and Evren Koban and Loun{\`e}s Chikhi and Alison Schaffer and Pedersen, {Niels C} and Mehmet Nizamlioǧlu and Inci Togan",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "249--254",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Research (Poland)",
issn = "2450-7393",
publisher = "De Gruyter Open Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs

AU - Altunok, Vahdettin

AU - Koban, Evren

AU - Chikhi, Lounès

AU - Schaffer, Alison

AU - Pedersen, Niels C

AU - Nizamlioǧlu, Mehmet

AU - Togan, Inci

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The genetic diversity of Kangal dogs (n=23) was analysed using 100 canine microsatellites, and the results were compared to Central Anatolian feral dogs (n=51), Akbash dogs (n=6), and Turkish greyhounds (TG, n=3). The Kangal, Akbash, Turkish greyhound and feral dogs were found to be significantly different from each other by FST measure. Factorial Correspondence Analysis (FCA), which evaluated the span of genotypic variation between individual dogs, yielded 4 distinct groups of the animals. Group I was composed of 12 pure Kangal dogs (Kangal I) without the Kangal looking hybrids of Kangals and feral dogs. Group II contained the remaining 11 Kangal dogs (Kangal II), 1 Turkish greyhound, and all feral dogs except for one. Group III was comprised of the remaining 2 Turkish greyhounds, while Group IV consisted of all of the Akbash dogs. Kangal I, Akbash and Turkish greyhound groups were scattered in different parts of the three-dimensional FCA plot. We conclude that Kangal dogs are genetically distinct and hence they deserve to be identified as a breed. Furthermore, it has been observed that microsatellites can be employed in the conservation efforts of Kangals.

AB - The genetic diversity of Kangal dogs (n=23) was analysed using 100 canine microsatellites, and the results were compared to Central Anatolian feral dogs (n=51), Akbash dogs (n=6), and Turkish greyhounds (TG, n=3). The Kangal, Akbash, Turkish greyhound and feral dogs were found to be significantly different from each other by FST measure. Factorial Correspondence Analysis (FCA), which evaluated the span of genotypic variation between individual dogs, yielded 4 distinct groups of the animals. Group I was composed of 12 pure Kangal dogs (Kangal I) without the Kangal looking hybrids of Kangals and feral dogs. Group II contained the remaining 11 Kangal dogs (Kangal II), 1 Turkish greyhound, and all feral dogs except for one. Group III was comprised of the remaining 2 Turkish greyhounds, while Group IV consisted of all of the Akbash dogs. Kangal I, Akbash and Turkish greyhound groups were scattered in different parts of the three-dimensional FCA plot. We conclude that Kangal dogs are genetically distinct and hence they deserve to be identified as a breed. Furthermore, it has been observed that microsatellites can be employed in the conservation efforts of Kangals.

KW - Dogs

KW - Genetic variability

KW - Microsatellites

KW - Population genetics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23644450394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23644450394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:23644450394

VL - 49

SP - 249

EP - 254

JO - Journal of Veterinary Research (Poland)

JF - Journal of Veterinary Research (Poland)

SN - 2450-7393

IS - 2

ER -