Generalized Signaling for Control: Evidence From Postconflict and Posterror Performance Adjustments

Raymond Y. Cho, Joseph M. Orr, Jonathan D. Cohen, Cameron S Carter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Goal-directed behavior requires cognitive control to effect online adjustments in response to ongoing processing demands. How signaling for these adjustments occurs has been a question of much interest. A basic question regarding the architecture of the cognitive control system is whether such signaling for control is specific to task context or generalizes across contexts. In this study, the authors explored this issue using a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. They examined trial-to-trial adjustments, specifically, the findings that incompatible trials elicit improved performance on subsequent incompatible trials and that responses are slower after errors. The critical question was, Do such control effects-typically observed within a single task context-occur across task contexts? The paradigm involved 2 orthogonal, stimulus-response sets: Stimuli in the horizontal direction mapped only to responses in the horizontal direction, and likewise for the vertical direction. Cues indicated that either compatible (same direction as stimulus) or incompatible (opposite to stimulus) responses were required. The results showed that trial-to-trial adjustments exist for both direction-repeat and direction-switch trials, demonstrating that signaling for control adjustments can extend beyond the task context within which they arise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1161-1177
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Cues
Direction compound
Stimulus

Keywords

  • attention
  • behavior
  • cognitive control
  • Simon task

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Generalized Signaling for Control : Evidence From Postconflict and Posterror Performance Adjustments. / Cho, Raymond Y.; Orr, Joseph M.; Cohen, Jonathan D.; Carter, Cameron S.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 35, No. 4, 08.2009, p. 1161-1177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0095b18e39c40f8bc8d746566492dd3,
title = "Generalized Signaling for Control: Evidence From Postconflict and Posterror Performance Adjustments",
abstract = "Goal-directed behavior requires cognitive control to effect online adjustments in response to ongoing processing demands. How signaling for these adjustments occurs has been a question of much interest. A basic question regarding the architecture of the cognitive control system is whether such signaling for control is specific to task context or generalizes across contexts. In this study, the authors explored this issue using a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. They examined trial-to-trial adjustments, specifically, the findings that incompatible trials elicit improved performance on subsequent incompatible trials and that responses are slower after errors. The critical question was, Do such control effects-typically observed within a single task context-occur across task contexts? The paradigm involved 2 orthogonal, stimulus-response sets: Stimuli in the horizontal direction mapped only to responses in the horizontal direction, and likewise for the vertical direction. Cues indicated that either compatible (same direction as stimulus) or incompatible (opposite to stimulus) responses were required. The results showed that trial-to-trial adjustments exist for both direction-repeat and direction-switch trials, demonstrating that signaling for control adjustments can extend beyond the task context within which they arise.",
keywords = "attention, behavior, cognitive control, Simon task",
author = "Cho, {Raymond Y.} and Orr, {Joseph M.} and Cohen, {Jonathan D.} and Carter, {Cameron S}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/a0014491",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1161--1177",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generalized Signaling for Control

T2 - Evidence From Postconflict and Posterror Performance Adjustments

AU - Cho, Raymond Y.

AU - Orr, Joseph M.

AU - Cohen, Jonathan D.

AU - Carter, Cameron S

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Goal-directed behavior requires cognitive control to effect online adjustments in response to ongoing processing demands. How signaling for these adjustments occurs has been a question of much interest. A basic question regarding the architecture of the cognitive control system is whether such signaling for control is specific to task context or generalizes across contexts. In this study, the authors explored this issue using a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. They examined trial-to-trial adjustments, specifically, the findings that incompatible trials elicit improved performance on subsequent incompatible trials and that responses are slower after errors. The critical question was, Do such control effects-typically observed within a single task context-occur across task contexts? The paradigm involved 2 orthogonal, stimulus-response sets: Stimuli in the horizontal direction mapped only to responses in the horizontal direction, and likewise for the vertical direction. Cues indicated that either compatible (same direction as stimulus) or incompatible (opposite to stimulus) responses were required. The results showed that trial-to-trial adjustments exist for both direction-repeat and direction-switch trials, demonstrating that signaling for control adjustments can extend beyond the task context within which they arise.

AB - Goal-directed behavior requires cognitive control to effect online adjustments in response to ongoing processing demands. How signaling for these adjustments occurs has been a question of much interest. A basic question regarding the architecture of the cognitive control system is whether such signaling for control is specific to task context or generalizes across contexts. In this study, the authors explored this issue using a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. They examined trial-to-trial adjustments, specifically, the findings that incompatible trials elicit improved performance on subsequent incompatible trials and that responses are slower after errors. The critical question was, Do such control effects-typically observed within a single task context-occur across task contexts? The paradigm involved 2 orthogonal, stimulus-response sets: Stimuli in the horizontal direction mapped only to responses in the horizontal direction, and likewise for the vertical direction. Cues indicated that either compatible (same direction as stimulus) or incompatible (opposite to stimulus) responses were required. The results showed that trial-to-trial adjustments exist for both direction-repeat and direction-switch trials, demonstrating that signaling for control adjustments can extend beyond the task context within which they arise.

KW - attention

KW - behavior

KW - cognitive control

KW - Simon task

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69049099965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69049099965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0014491

DO - 10.1037/a0014491

M3 - Article

C2 - 19653756

AN - SCOPUS:69049099965

VL - 35

SP - 1161

EP - 1177

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 4

ER -