Gatekeeping in primary care

A comparison of internal medicine and family practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Five hundred twenty new patients were randomly and prospectively assigned to receive their care in the Internal Medicine Clinic or Family Practice Clinic of a large university hospital. The patients were followed by residents in training under the supervision of board-certified internists or family physicians. After a mean length of care of slightly over two years, the charts were reviewed for frequency of visits to primary care providers (internal medicine or family practice), Emergency Room, Acute Care Clinic, and all clinics other than the two primary care clinics. The records were also reviewed for laboratory tests ordered. Frequency of visits to the clinic of primary care, Emergency Room, Acute Care Clinic, and broken appointments were all significantly higher for patients randomized to the Internal Medicine Clinic. In addition, the median total annual cost of laboratory tests for patients followed by internal medicine physicians was significantly higher, largely because of higher laboratory charges generated by the specialist consultants. Over the study period, internal medicine patients had a significantly higher number of visits to all nonprimary care clinics and specifically to the dermatology, obstetrics and gynecology, and general surgery consultant clinics. It can be concluded that in this clinical environment, the practice styles of internal medicine and family practice are different.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-309
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Family Practice
Volume24
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1987

Fingerprint

Gatekeeping
Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Primary Health Care
Consultants
Hospital Emergency Service
Obstetric Surgical Procedures
Family Physicians
Ambulatory Care
Dermatology
Gynecology
Appointments and Schedules
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Gatekeeping in primary care : A comparison of internal medicine and family practice. / Bertakis, Klea D; Robbins, John A.

In: Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1987, p. 305-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7cfd8a286a764897b877fa24e8de414f,
title = "Gatekeeping in primary care: A comparison of internal medicine and family practice",
abstract = "Five hundred twenty new patients were randomly and prospectively assigned to receive their care in the Internal Medicine Clinic or Family Practice Clinic of a large university hospital. The patients were followed by residents in training under the supervision of board-certified internists or family physicians. After a mean length of care of slightly over two years, the charts were reviewed for frequency of visits to primary care providers (internal medicine or family practice), Emergency Room, Acute Care Clinic, and all clinics other than the two primary care clinics. The records were also reviewed for laboratory tests ordered. Frequency of visits to the clinic of primary care, Emergency Room, Acute Care Clinic, and broken appointments were all significantly higher for patients randomized to the Internal Medicine Clinic. In addition, the median total annual cost of laboratory tests for patients followed by internal medicine physicians was significantly higher, largely because of higher laboratory charges generated by the specialist consultants. Over the study period, internal medicine patients had a significantly higher number of visits to all nonprimary care clinics and specifically to the dermatology, obstetrics and gynecology, and general surgery consultant clinics. It can be concluded that in this clinical environment, the practice styles of internal medicine and family practice are different.",
author = "Bertakis, {Klea D} and Robbins, {John A}",
year = "1987",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "305--309",
journal = "Journal of Family Practice",
issn = "0094-3509",
publisher = "Appleton-Century-Crofts",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gatekeeping in primary care

T2 - A comparison of internal medicine and family practice

AU - Bertakis, Klea D

AU - Robbins, John A

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - Five hundred twenty new patients were randomly and prospectively assigned to receive their care in the Internal Medicine Clinic or Family Practice Clinic of a large university hospital. The patients were followed by residents in training under the supervision of board-certified internists or family physicians. After a mean length of care of slightly over two years, the charts were reviewed for frequency of visits to primary care providers (internal medicine or family practice), Emergency Room, Acute Care Clinic, and all clinics other than the two primary care clinics. The records were also reviewed for laboratory tests ordered. Frequency of visits to the clinic of primary care, Emergency Room, Acute Care Clinic, and broken appointments were all significantly higher for patients randomized to the Internal Medicine Clinic. In addition, the median total annual cost of laboratory tests for patients followed by internal medicine physicians was significantly higher, largely because of higher laboratory charges generated by the specialist consultants. Over the study period, internal medicine patients had a significantly higher number of visits to all nonprimary care clinics and specifically to the dermatology, obstetrics and gynecology, and general surgery consultant clinics. It can be concluded that in this clinical environment, the practice styles of internal medicine and family practice are different.

AB - Five hundred twenty new patients were randomly and prospectively assigned to receive their care in the Internal Medicine Clinic or Family Practice Clinic of a large university hospital. The patients were followed by residents in training under the supervision of board-certified internists or family physicians. After a mean length of care of slightly over two years, the charts were reviewed for frequency of visits to primary care providers (internal medicine or family practice), Emergency Room, Acute Care Clinic, and all clinics other than the two primary care clinics. The records were also reviewed for laboratory tests ordered. Frequency of visits to the clinic of primary care, Emergency Room, Acute Care Clinic, and broken appointments were all significantly higher for patients randomized to the Internal Medicine Clinic. In addition, the median total annual cost of laboratory tests for patients followed by internal medicine physicians was significantly higher, largely because of higher laboratory charges generated by the specialist consultants. Over the study period, internal medicine patients had a significantly higher number of visits to all nonprimary care clinics and specifically to the dermatology, obstetrics and gynecology, and general surgery consultant clinics. It can be concluded that in this clinical environment, the practice styles of internal medicine and family practice are different.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023118904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023118904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 305

EP - 309

JO - Journal of Family Practice

JF - Journal of Family Practice

SN - 0094-3509

IS - 3

ER -