Functional recovery following neurorrhaphy of the rat sciatic nerve by epineurial repair compared with tubulization

R. S. Meyer, R. A. Abrams, M. J. Botte, J. P. Davey, S. C. Bodine-Fowler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recovery of motor function is often poor following transection injuries to peripheral nerves. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare functional recovery of the sciatic nerve in the rat following transection and neurorrhaphy with the use of a nerve guide tube and with traditional end-to- end epineurial repair. Muscle recovery was also evaluated following a crush injury, a model of an axonotmetic lesion. Recovery was assessed at 8, 16, and 32 weeks after injury by measuring the isometric contractile properties of the soleus muscle and at 8 and 16 weeks by measuring the conduction properties of the sciatic nerve. The mean conduction velocity of the sciatic nerve in the crush group and both transection groups was significantly slower than that of controls at both 8 and 16 weeks. Following a transection injury, the soleus became a significantly faster muscle as measured by time to peak twitch tension. By 32 weeks, the maximum isometric tension of the soleus muscle recovered to 90% that of the control group following a crush injury and to less than 70% following a transection injury and repair. Recovery was better in the epineurial repair group than in the tube repair group at 8 weeks, but no difference was found between the groups at 16 or 32 weeks. These results demonstrate that nerve guide tubes are a potential alternative to epineurial repair. The poor motor recovery following repair of transection injuries may be related to poor specificity of reinnervation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)664-669
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Research
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1997

Fingerprint

Sciatic Nerve
Wounds and Injuries
Skeletal Muscle
Nerve Crush
Peripheral Nerve Injuries
Muscles
Recovery of Function
Control Groups
Crush Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Functional recovery following neurorrhaphy of the rat sciatic nerve by epineurial repair compared with tubulization. / Meyer, R. S.; Abrams, R. A.; Botte, M. J.; Davey, J. P.; Bodine-Fowler, S. C.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Vol. 15, No. 5, 09.1997, p. 664-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meyer, R. S. ; Abrams, R. A. ; Botte, M. J. ; Davey, J. P. ; Bodine-Fowler, S. C. / Functional recovery following neurorrhaphy of the rat sciatic nerve by epineurial repair compared with tubulization. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1997 ; Vol. 15, No. 5. pp. 664-669.
@article{00d04f4cf4f7468f9d2c16b1436c3e40,
title = "Functional recovery following neurorrhaphy of the rat sciatic nerve by epineurial repair compared with tubulization",
abstract = "Recovery of motor function is often poor following transection injuries to peripheral nerves. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare functional recovery of the sciatic nerve in the rat following transection and neurorrhaphy with the use of a nerve guide tube and with traditional end-to- end epineurial repair. Muscle recovery was also evaluated following a crush injury, a model of an axonotmetic lesion. Recovery was assessed at 8, 16, and 32 weeks after injury by measuring the isometric contractile properties of the soleus muscle and at 8 and 16 weeks by measuring the conduction properties of the sciatic nerve. The mean conduction velocity of the sciatic nerve in the crush group and both transection groups was significantly slower than that of controls at both 8 and 16 weeks. Following a transection injury, the soleus became a significantly faster muscle as measured by time to peak twitch tension. By 32 weeks, the maximum isometric tension of the soleus muscle recovered to 90{\%} that of the control group following a crush injury and to less than 70{\%} following a transection injury and repair. Recovery was better in the epineurial repair group than in the tube repair group at 8 weeks, but no difference was found between the groups at 16 or 32 weeks. These results demonstrate that nerve guide tubes are a potential alternative to epineurial repair. The poor motor recovery following repair of transection injuries may be related to poor specificity of reinnervation.",
author = "Meyer, {R. S.} and Abrams, {R. A.} and Botte, {M. J.} and Davey, {J. P.} and Bodine-Fowler, {S. C.}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/jor.1100150506",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "664--669",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Research",
issn = "0736-0266",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional recovery following neurorrhaphy of the rat sciatic nerve by epineurial repair compared with tubulization

AU - Meyer, R. S.

AU - Abrams, R. A.

AU - Botte, M. J.

AU - Davey, J. P.

AU - Bodine-Fowler, S. C.

PY - 1997/9

Y1 - 1997/9

N2 - Recovery of motor function is often poor following transection injuries to peripheral nerves. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare functional recovery of the sciatic nerve in the rat following transection and neurorrhaphy with the use of a nerve guide tube and with traditional end-to- end epineurial repair. Muscle recovery was also evaluated following a crush injury, a model of an axonotmetic lesion. Recovery was assessed at 8, 16, and 32 weeks after injury by measuring the isometric contractile properties of the soleus muscle and at 8 and 16 weeks by measuring the conduction properties of the sciatic nerve. The mean conduction velocity of the sciatic nerve in the crush group and both transection groups was significantly slower than that of controls at both 8 and 16 weeks. Following a transection injury, the soleus became a significantly faster muscle as measured by time to peak twitch tension. By 32 weeks, the maximum isometric tension of the soleus muscle recovered to 90% that of the control group following a crush injury and to less than 70% following a transection injury and repair. Recovery was better in the epineurial repair group than in the tube repair group at 8 weeks, but no difference was found between the groups at 16 or 32 weeks. These results demonstrate that nerve guide tubes are a potential alternative to epineurial repair. The poor motor recovery following repair of transection injuries may be related to poor specificity of reinnervation.

AB - Recovery of motor function is often poor following transection injuries to peripheral nerves. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare functional recovery of the sciatic nerve in the rat following transection and neurorrhaphy with the use of a nerve guide tube and with traditional end-to- end epineurial repair. Muscle recovery was also evaluated following a crush injury, a model of an axonotmetic lesion. Recovery was assessed at 8, 16, and 32 weeks after injury by measuring the isometric contractile properties of the soleus muscle and at 8 and 16 weeks by measuring the conduction properties of the sciatic nerve. The mean conduction velocity of the sciatic nerve in the crush group and both transection groups was significantly slower than that of controls at both 8 and 16 weeks. Following a transection injury, the soleus became a significantly faster muscle as measured by time to peak twitch tension. By 32 weeks, the maximum isometric tension of the soleus muscle recovered to 90% that of the control group following a crush injury and to less than 70% following a transection injury and repair. Recovery was better in the epineurial repair group than in the tube repair group at 8 weeks, but no difference was found between the groups at 16 or 32 weeks. These results demonstrate that nerve guide tubes are a potential alternative to epineurial repair. The poor motor recovery following repair of transection injuries may be related to poor specificity of reinnervation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031227431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031227431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jor.1100150506

DO - 10.1002/jor.1100150506

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 664

EP - 669

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Research

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Research

SN - 0736-0266

IS - 5

ER -