From SCHIP benefit design to individual coverage decisions.

Anne Markus, Sara Rosenbaum, Ruth E K Stein, Jill G Joseph

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The majority of states have implemented separate SCHIP (S-SCHIP) programs that significantly depart from Medicaid and resemble less comprehensive commercial products. This difference in program design may result in S-SCHIP potentially being less responsive to children with special needs (CSHCNs). This study explores how responsive insurers are to these higher than average needs. We found that, with one exception, insurers did not agree on the coverage of any specific service, but overall they provided coverage beyond state limits and exclusions. Second, the less acute the childhood condition, the more frequently insurers imposed exclusions. Finally, in the majority of states, some insurers excluded services that arguably should have been covered according to the plan/contract language. We conclude that SCHIP coverage at current levels may not be sufficient to care for CSHCNs, making external reviews of insurers' coverage decisions and coordination with other sources of care important components of SCHIP program design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPolicy brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)
Pages1-24
Number of pages24
Edition6
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Insurance Carriers
Medicaid
Contracts
Language

Cite this

Markus, A., Rosenbaum, S., Stein, R. E. K., & Joseph, J. G. (2006). From SCHIP benefit design to individual coverage decisions. In Policy brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy) (6 ed., pp. 1-24)

From SCHIP benefit design to individual coverage decisions. / Markus, Anne; Rosenbaum, Sara; Stein, Ruth E K; Joseph, Jill G.

Policy brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy). 6. ed. 2006. p. 1-24.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Markus, A, Rosenbaum, S, Stein, REK & Joseph, JG 2006, From SCHIP benefit design to individual coverage decisions. in Policy brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy). 6 edn, pp. 1-24.
Markus A, Rosenbaum S, Stein REK, Joseph JG. From SCHIP benefit design to individual coverage decisions. In Policy brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy). 6 ed. 2006. p. 1-24
Markus, Anne ; Rosenbaum, Sara ; Stein, Ruth E K ; Joseph, Jill G. / From SCHIP benefit design to individual coverage decisions. Policy brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy). 6. ed. 2006. pp. 1-24
@inbook{d3c141de29174ee1924e9dff5f88e93e,
title = "From SCHIP benefit design to individual coverage decisions.",
abstract = "The majority of states have implemented separate SCHIP (S-SCHIP) programs that significantly depart from Medicaid and resemble less comprehensive commercial products. This difference in program design may result in S-SCHIP potentially being less responsive to children with special needs (CSHCNs). This study explores how responsive insurers are to these higher than average needs. We found that, with one exception, insurers did not agree on the coverage of any specific service, but overall they provided coverage beyond state limits and exclusions. Second, the less acute the childhood condition, the more frequently insurers imposed exclusions. Finally, in the majority of states, some insurers excluded services that arguably should have been covered according to the plan/contract language. We conclude that SCHIP coverage at current levels may not be sufficient to care for CSHCNs, making external reviews of insurers' coverage decisions and coordination with other sources of care important components of SCHIP program design.",
author = "Anne Markus and Sara Rosenbaum and Stein, {Ruth E K} and Joseph, {Jill G}",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--24",
booktitle = "Policy brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)",
edition = "6",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - From SCHIP benefit design to individual coverage decisions.

AU - Markus, Anne

AU - Rosenbaum, Sara

AU - Stein, Ruth E K

AU - Joseph, Jill G

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The majority of states have implemented separate SCHIP (S-SCHIP) programs that significantly depart from Medicaid and resemble less comprehensive commercial products. This difference in program design may result in S-SCHIP potentially being less responsive to children with special needs (CSHCNs). This study explores how responsive insurers are to these higher than average needs. We found that, with one exception, insurers did not agree on the coverage of any specific service, but overall they provided coverage beyond state limits and exclusions. Second, the less acute the childhood condition, the more frequently insurers imposed exclusions. Finally, in the majority of states, some insurers excluded services that arguably should have been covered according to the plan/contract language. We conclude that SCHIP coverage at current levels may not be sufficient to care for CSHCNs, making external reviews of insurers' coverage decisions and coordination with other sources of care important components of SCHIP program design.

AB - The majority of states have implemented separate SCHIP (S-SCHIP) programs that significantly depart from Medicaid and resemble less comprehensive commercial products. This difference in program design may result in S-SCHIP potentially being less responsive to children with special needs (CSHCNs). This study explores how responsive insurers are to these higher than average needs. We found that, with one exception, insurers did not agree on the coverage of any specific service, but overall they provided coverage beyond state limits and exclusions. Second, the less acute the childhood condition, the more frequently insurers imposed exclusions. Finally, in the majority of states, some insurers excluded services that arguably should have been covered according to the plan/contract language. We conclude that SCHIP coverage at current levels may not be sufficient to care for CSHCNs, making external reviews of insurers' coverage decisions and coordination with other sources of care important components of SCHIP program design.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644872959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644872959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

C2 - 16465692

AN - SCOPUS:33644872959

SP - 1

EP - 24

BT - Policy brief (George Washington University. Center for Health Services Research and Policy)

ER -