Free flap monitoring: A review of the recent literature

Brian Cervenka, Arnaud Bewley

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Free flap surgery has revolutionized our ability to perform composite reconstructions following ablative surgery. Although flap failure is rare (∼5%), it results in high patient morbidity if not recognized and corrected early. There are numerous means to assess flap viability. We review the recent literature on flap monitoring, and discuss the difference between techniques in regard to overall flap survival, cost, and ease of use. Recent findings The current literature on implantable Doppler, microdialysis, video-based application (Eulerian), fluorescence angiography, spectroscopy, contrast-enhanced duplex, and activated clotting time is reviewed. Of these methods, implantable Doppler and spectroscopy have the most recent and largest series of data describing efficacy with implantable Doppler, demonstrating comparable flap survival rates to clinical monitoring. Arterial implantable Doppler has the additional benefit of less false-positives than venous Doppler. Spectroscopy demonstrates promise with commensurate flap survival rates and improved salvage rates over clinical monitoring. Summary Clinical monitoring alone has proven to be so effective that it is difficult to demonstrate better outcomes with alternative methods. That said, a minimally invasive, reliable method that does not require physician assessment on a frequent basis would prove ideal in many small centers and academic centers limited by resident hours. Venous and, more recently, arterial monitoring have been successfully implemented at many programs. Spectroscopy appears promising, but the data are still limited.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)393-398
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Free Tissue Flaps
Spectrum Analysis
Survival Rate
Fluorescein Angiography
Fluorescence Spectrometry
Microdialysis
Morbidity
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Survival

Keywords

  • Arterial Doppler
  • free flap monitoring
  • free tissue transfer monitoring
  • spectroscopy
  • venous Doppler

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Free flap monitoring : A review of the recent literature. / Cervenka, Brian; Bewley, Arnaud.

In: Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.01.2015, p. 393-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{bb4e1e5e43e0464680ed9be3755039a4,
title = "Free flap monitoring: A review of the recent literature",
abstract = "Free flap surgery has revolutionized our ability to perform composite reconstructions following ablative surgery. Although flap failure is rare (∼5{\%}), it results in high patient morbidity if not recognized and corrected early. There are numerous means to assess flap viability. We review the recent literature on flap monitoring, and discuss the difference between techniques in regard to overall flap survival, cost, and ease of use. Recent findings The current literature on implantable Doppler, microdialysis, video-based application (Eulerian), fluorescence angiography, spectroscopy, contrast-enhanced duplex, and activated clotting time is reviewed. Of these methods, implantable Doppler and spectroscopy have the most recent and largest series of data describing efficacy with implantable Doppler, demonstrating comparable flap survival rates to clinical monitoring. Arterial implantable Doppler has the additional benefit of less false-positives than venous Doppler. Spectroscopy demonstrates promise with commensurate flap survival rates and improved salvage rates over clinical monitoring. Summary Clinical monitoring alone has proven to be so effective that it is difficult to demonstrate better outcomes with alternative methods. That said, a minimally invasive, reliable method that does not require physician assessment on a frequent basis would prove ideal in many small centers and academic centers limited by resident hours. Venous and, more recently, arterial monitoring have been successfully implemented at many programs. Spectroscopy appears promising, but the data are still limited.",
keywords = "Arterial Doppler, free flap monitoring, free tissue transfer monitoring, spectroscopy, venous Doppler",
author = "Brian Cervenka and Arnaud Bewley",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MOO.0000000000000189",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "393--398",
journal = "Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "1068-9508",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Free flap monitoring

T2 - A review of the recent literature

AU - Cervenka, Brian

AU - Bewley, Arnaud

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Free flap surgery has revolutionized our ability to perform composite reconstructions following ablative surgery. Although flap failure is rare (∼5%), it results in high patient morbidity if not recognized and corrected early. There are numerous means to assess flap viability. We review the recent literature on flap monitoring, and discuss the difference between techniques in regard to overall flap survival, cost, and ease of use. Recent findings The current literature on implantable Doppler, microdialysis, video-based application (Eulerian), fluorescence angiography, spectroscopy, contrast-enhanced duplex, and activated clotting time is reviewed. Of these methods, implantable Doppler and spectroscopy have the most recent and largest series of data describing efficacy with implantable Doppler, demonstrating comparable flap survival rates to clinical monitoring. Arterial implantable Doppler has the additional benefit of less false-positives than venous Doppler. Spectroscopy demonstrates promise with commensurate flap survival rates and improved salvage rates over clinical monitoring. Summary Clinical monitoring alone has proven to be so effective that it is difficult to demonstrate better outcomes with alternative methods. That said, a minimally invasive, reliable method that does not require physician assessment on a frequent basis would prove ideal in many small centers and academic centers limited by resident hours. Venous and, more recently, arterial monitoring have been successfully implemented at many programs. Spectroscopy appears promising, but the data are still limited.

AB - Free flap surgery has revolutionized our ability to perform composite reconstructions following ablative surgery. Although flap failure is rare (∼5%), it results in high patient morbidity if not recognized and corrected early. There are numerous means to assess flap viability. We review the recent literature on flap monitoring, and discuss the difference between techniques in regard to overall flap survival, cost, and ease of use. Recent findings The current literature on implantable Doppler, microdialysis, video-based application (Eulerian), fluorescence angiography, spectroscopy, contrast-enhanced duplex, and activated clotting time is reviewed. Of these methods, implantable Doppler and spectroscopy have the most recent and largest series of data describing efficacy with implantable Doppler, demonstrating comparable flap survival rates to clinical monitoring. Arterial implantable Doppler has the additional benefit of less false-positives than venous Doppler. Spectroscopy demonstrates promise with commensurate flap survival rates and improved salvage rates over clinical monitoring. Summary Clinical monitoring alone has proven to be so effective that it is difficult to demonstrate better outcomes with alternative methods. That said, a minimally invasive, reliable method that does not require physician assessment on a frequent basis would prove ideal in many small centers and academic centers limited by resident hours. Venous and, more recently, arterial monitoring have been successfully implemented at many programs. Spectroscopy appears promising, but the data are still limited.

KW - Arterial Doppler

KW - free flap monitoring

KW - free tissue transfer monitoring

KW - spectroscopy

KW - venous Doppler

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960120205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960120205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000189

DO - 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000189

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26339970

AN - SCOPUS:84960120205

VL - 23

SP - 393

EP - 398

JO - Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

JF - Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 1068-9508

IS - 5

ER -