Two clinically different episodes of nitrate toxicosis in heifers at the same dairy were evaluated to determine whether dietary supplements could have contributed to the confounding signs of illness. The first episode followed a 24-hour period of feeding mismanagement and resultant overconsumption of both a protein/nonprotein nitrogen supplement and a monensin supplement. This episode was characterized by ataxia, bloating, and death, without the classic clinical signs of dyspnea, salivation, cyanosis, and dark-colored blood, or the cardinal histologic changes of cyanosis, tissue staining, petechiations, or congestion. Approximately 5 weeks later, another episode developed, without the feeding mismanagement or the presence of supplements, and was characterized by classic signs of nitrate toxicosis along with response to methylene blue treatment. In both episodes, the feed source was the same, with high concentrations of nitrate. Heifers of both episodes had high ocular nitrate values, confirming the toxicoses. The difference was the availability of supplements. Calculation of exposure makes it unlikely that either the nonprotein moiety or the monensin moiety could have reached toxic values. However, the cell-level effects of monensin may have caused the animals to not display classic signs of nitrate toxicosis, confusing the diagnosis and treatment. This report demonstrates how field toxicosis can differ from reports of toxicoses caused by single etiologic agents. Practitioners must be aware of the potential for interactions between (and confounding by) commercially used feed components.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||4|
|Journal||Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association|
|State||Published - Jan 1 1991|
ASJC Scopus subject areas