Food allergy diagnostics: Scientific and unproven procedures

Kirsten Beyer, Suzanne S Teuber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review: The accurate diagnosis of food allergy is crucial not only for the right treatment but also for the avoidance of unnecessary diets. The diagnostic work-up of suspected food allergy includes the measurement of food-specific IgE antibodies using serologic assays, the skin prick test, elimination diets and oral provocation tests. In Addition, some approaches are either under further rigorous investigation (the atopy patch test) or are already in widespread use, particularly by practitioners of alternative or complementary medicine, but are considered unproven. These diagnostic methods include specific IgG to foods, provocation/neutralization testing, kinesiology, cytotoxic tests and electrodermal testing. This review covers some of the most common scientifically validated and unproven approaches used in the diagnosis of food allergy. Recent findings: For specific serum IgE and the SPT, decision points have been established for some foods, allowing prediction of clinical relevance. The APT maybe helpful, especially when considered in combination with defined levels of specific IgE. In regard to other approaches, most scientific studies do refute the usefulness of these approaches. Summary: In most patients, controlled oral food challenges remain the gold standard in the diagnosis work-up of suspected food allergy. The skin prick test and measurement of specific IgE antibodies to food extracts, individual allergens or allergenic peptides are helpful in the diagnostic approach. Food-specific IgG continues to be an unproven or experimental test. The other alternative and complementary techniques have no proven benefit and may endanger patients via misdiagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-266
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume5
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Food Hypersensitivity
Food
Immunoglobulin E
Complementary Therapies
Skin Tests
Immunoglobulin G
Diet
Patch Tests
Antibodies
Diagnostic Errors
Allergens
Peptides
Serum

Keywords

  • Atopy patch test
  • Cytotoxic test
  • Electrodermal testing
  • Food-specific IgE
  • Food-specific IgG
  • Kinesiology
  • Oral food challenge
  • Provocation tests
  • Skin prick test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

Food allergy diagnostics : Scientific and unproven procedures. / Beyer, Kirsten; Teuber, Suzanne S.

In: Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 5, No. 3, 06.2005, p. 261-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01d66b8c19ae4ca09440bc6b340fc912,
title = "Food allergy diagnostics: Scientific and unproven procedures",
abstract = "Purpose of review: The accurate diagnosis of food allergy is crucial not only for the right treatment but also for the avoidance of unnecessary diets. The diagnostic work-up of suspected food allergy includes the measurement of food-specific IgE antibodies using serologic assays, the skin prick test, elimination diets and oral provocation tests. In Addition, some approaches are either under further rigorous investigation (the atopy patch test) or are already in widespread use, particularly by practitioners of alternative or complementary medicine, but are considered unproven. These diagnostic methods include specific IgG to foods, provocation/neutralization testing, kinesiology, cytotoxic tests and electrodermal testing. This review covers some of the most common scientifically validated and unproven approaches used in the diagnosis of food allergy. Recent findings: For specific serum IgE and the SPT, decision points have been established for some foods, allowing prediction of clinical relevance. The APT maybe helpful, especially when considered in combination with defined levels of specific IgE. In regard to other approaches, most scientific studies do refute the usefulness of these approaches. Summary: In most patients, controlled oral food challenges remain the gold standard in the diagnosis work-up of suspected food allergy. The skin prick test and measurement of specific IgE antibodies to food extracts, individual allergens or allergenic peptides are helpful in the diagnostic approach. Food-specific IgG continues to be an unproven or experimental test. The other alternative and complementary techniques have no proven benefit and may endanger patients via misdiagnosis.",
keywords = "Atopy patch test, Cytotoxic test, Electrodermal testing, Food-specific IgE, Food-specific IgG, Kinesiology, Oral food challenge, Provocation tests, Skin prick test",
author = "Kirsten Beyer and Teuber, {Suzanne S}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "261--266",
journal = "Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology",
issn = "1528-4050",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Food allergy diagnostics

T2 - Scientific and unproven procedures

AU - Beyer, Kirsten

AU - Teuber, Suzanne S

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Purpose of review: The accurate diagnosis of food allergy is crucial not only for the right treatment but also for the avoidance of unnecessary diets. The diagnostic work-up of suspected food allergy includes the measurement of food-specific IgE antibodies using serologic assays, the skin prick test, elimination diets and oral provocation tests. In Addition, some approaches are either under further rigorous investigation (the atopy patch test) or are already in widespread use, particularly by practitioners of alternative or complementary medicine, but are considered unproven. These diagnostic methods include specific IgG to foods, provocation/neutralization testing, kinesiology, cytotoxic tests and electrodermal testing. This review covers some of the most common scientifically validated and unproven approaches used in the diagnosis of food allergy. Recent findings: For specific serum IgE and the SPT, decision points have been established for some foods, allowing prediction of clinical relevance. The APT maybe helpful, especially when considered in combination with defined levels of specific IgE. In regard to other approaches, most scientific studies do refute the usefulness of these approaches. Summary: In most patients, controlled oral food challenges remain the gold standard in the diagnosis work-up of suspected food allergy. The skin prick test and measurement of specific IgE antibodies to food extracts, individual allergens or allergenic peptides are helpful in the diagnostic approach. Food-specific IgG continues to be an unproven or experimental test. The other alternative and complementary techniques have no proven benefit and may endanger patients via misdiagnosis.

AB - Purpose of review: The accurate diagnosis of food allergy is crucial not only for the right treatment but also for the avoidance of unnecessary diets. The diagnostic work-up of suspected food allergy includes the measurement of food-specific IgE antibodies using serologic assays, the skin prick test, elimination diets and oral provocation tests. In Addition, some approaches are either under further rigorous investigation (the atopy patch test) or are already in widespread use, particularly by practitioners of alternative or complementary medicine, but are considered unproven. These diagnostic methods include specific IgG to foods, provocation/neutralization testing, kinesiology, cytotoxic tests and electrodermal testing. This review covers some of the most common scientifically validated and unproven approaches used in the diagnosis of food allergy. Recent findings: For specific serum IgE and the SPT, decision points have been established for some foods, allowing prediction of clinical relevance. The APT maybe helpful, especially when considered in combination with defined levels of specific IgE. In regard to other approaches, most scientific studies do refute the usefulness of these approaches. Summary: In most patients, controlled oral food challenges remain the gold standard in the diagnosis work-up of suspected food allergy. The skin prick test and measurement of specific IgE antibodies to food extracts, individual allergens or allergenic peptides are helpful in the diagnostic approach. Food-specific IgG continues to be an unproven or experimental test. The other alternative and complementary techniques have no proven benefit and may endanger patients via misdiagnosis.

KW - Atopy patch test

KW - Cytotoxic test

KW - Electrodermal testing

KW - Food-specific IgE

KW - Food-specific IgG

KW - Kinesiology

KW - Oral food challenge

KW - Provocation tests

KW - Skin prick test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18844377420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18844377420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15864086

AN - SCOPUS:18844377420

VL - 5

SP - 261

EP - 266

JO - Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology

JF - Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology

SN - 1528-4050

IS - 3

ER -