Flammability of common ocular lubricants in an oxygen-rich environment

Patrick Kelley, Mary A O'Hara, John Bishop, Ruth Brenner, Erin Doe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. Approximately 100 surgical fires take place in the United States each year. Recently, an ophthalmic lubricant was blamed for burning a child's eye while oxygen was administered during surgery. This study sought to determine whether four common ocular lubricants would ignite and sustain combustion in an oxygen-rich or standard room air environment. Methods. A model head was modified to allow placement of a cow eye and marked with 1-inch gradations from the eye. A nasal cannula supplied room air and 100% oxygen at flow rates of 0, 2, 4, and 6 L/minute. Four common ocular lubricants were chosen and placed on the eye before attempted ignition. The ignition source (an AccuTemp disposable electrocautery unit and unipolar and bipolar cautery set at 10, 20, and 30 watts) was brought down from the hairline toward the cannula. Each lubricant was tested with each ignition source and each room air/oxygen flow rate. Results. None of the ocular lubricants ignited under any of the experimental environments tested. A small surface flame was noted with the AccuTemp electrocautery unit, but it did not create a flash fire during the experiment. Conclusions. The ocular lubricants in this experiment showed no detectable tendency to ignite, even with direct application of the ignition source. Factors such as body hair or oxygen pooling likely provided the conditions necessary for the surgical fire. Most importantly, the ophthalmic lubricants tested actually protected the corneal epithelium and decreased damage to the conjunctiva and lids.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-293
Number of pages3
JournalEye and Contact Lens
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Lubricants
Oxygen
Electrocoagulation
Air
Cautery
Corneal Epithelium
Conjunctiva
Hair
Head

Keywords

  • Operating room fire
  • Oxygen pooling
  • Surgical fire
  • Surgical lubricant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Flammability of common ocular lubricants in an oxygen-rich environment. / Kelley, Patrick; O'Hara, Mary A; Bishop, John; Brenner, Ruth; Doe, Erin.

In: Eye and Contact Lens, Vol. 31, No. 6, 11.2005, p. 291-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kelley, Patrick ; O'Hara, Mary A ; Bishop, John ; Brenner, Ruth ; Doe, Erin. / Flammability of common ocular lubricants in an oxygen-rich environment. In: Eye and Contact Lens. 2005 ; Vol. 31, No. 6. pp. 291-293.
@article{2b567b48233045b2af37c782b9223e31,
title = "Flammability of common ocular lubricants in an oxygen-rich environment",
abstract = "Purpose. Approximately 100 surgical fires take place in the United States each year. Recently, an ophthalmic lubricant was blamed for burning a child's eye while oxygen was administered during surgery. This study sought to determine whether four common ocular lubricants would ignite and sustain combustion in an oxygen-rich or standard room air environment. Methods. A model head was modified to allow placement of a cow eye and marked with 1-inch gradations from the eye. A nasal cannula supplied room air and 100{\%} oxygen at flow rates of 0, 2, 4, and 6 L/minute. Four common ocular lubricants were chosen and placed on the eye before attempted ignition. The ignition source (an AccuTemp disposable electrocautery unit and unipolar and bipolar cautery set at 10, 20, and 30 watts) was brought down from the hairline toward the cannula. Each lubricant was tested with each ignition source and each room air/oxygen flow rate. Results. None of the ocular lubricants ignited under any of the experimental environments tested. A small surface flame was noted with the AccuTemp electrocautery unit, but it did not create a flash fire during the experiment. Conclusions. The ocular lubricants in this experiment showed no detectable tendency to ignite, even with direct application of the ignition source. Factors such as body hair or oxygen pooling likely provided the conditions necessary for the surgical fire. Most importantly, the ophthalmic lubricants tested actually protected the corneal epithelium and decreased damage to the conjunctiva and lids.",
keywords = "Operating room fire, Oxygen pooling, Surgical fire, Surgical lubricant",
author = "Patrick Kelley and O'Hara, {Mary A} and John Bishop and Ruth Brenner and Erin Doe",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/01.icl.0000175988.66193.72",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "291--293",
journal = "Eye and Contact Lense",
issn = "1542-2321",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flammability of common ocular lubricants in an oxygen-rich environment

AU - Kelley, Patrick

AU - O'Hara, Mary A

AU - Bishop, John

AU - Brenner, Ruth

AU - Doe, Erin

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Purpose. Approximately 100 surgical fires take place in the United States each year. Recently, an ophthalmic lubricant was blamed for burning a child's eye while oxygen was administered during surgery. This study sought to determine whether four common ocular lubricants would ignite and sustain combustion in an oxygen-rich or standard room air environment. Methods. A model head was modified to allow placement of a cow eye and marked with 1-inch gradations from the eye. A nasal cannula supplied room air and 100% oxygen at flow rates of 0, 2, 4, and 6 L/minute. Four common ocular lubricants were chosen and placed on the eye before attempted ignition. The ignition source (an AccuTemp disposable electrocautery unit and unipolar and bipolar cautery set at 10, 20, and 30 watts) was brought down from the hairline toward the cannula. Each lubricant was tested with each ignition source and each room air/oxygen flow rate. Results. None of the ocular lubricants ignited under any of the experimental environments tested. A small surface flame was noted with the AccuTemp electrocautery unit, but it did not create a flash fire during the experiment. Conclusions. The ocular lubricants in this experiment showed no detectable tendency to ignite, even with direct application of the ignition source. Factors such as body hair or oxygen pooling likely provided the conditions necessary for the surgical fire. Most importantly, the ophthalmic lubricants tested actually protected the corneal epithelium and decreased damage to the conjunctiva and lids.

AB - Purpose. Approximately 100 surgical fires take place in the United States each year. Recently, an ophthalmic lubricant was blamed for burning a child's eye while oxygen was administered during surgery. This study sought to determine whether four common ocular lubricants would ignite and sustain combustion in an oxygen-rich or standard room air environment. Methods. A model head was modified to allow placement of a cow eye and marked with 1-inch gradations from the eye. A nasal cannula supplied room air and 100% oxygen at flow rates of 0, 2, 4, and 6 L/minute. Four common ocular lubricants were chosen and placed on the eye before attempted ignition. The ignition source (an AccuTemp disposable electrocautery unit and unipolar and bipolar cautery set at 10, 20, and 30 watts) was brought down from the hairline toward the cannula. Each lubricant was tested with each ignition source and each room air/oxygen flow rate. Results. None of the ocular lubricants ignited under any of the experimental environments tested. A small surface flame was noted with the AccuTemp electrocautery unit, but it did not create a flash fire during the experiment. Conclusions. The ocular lubricants in this experiment showed no detectable tendency to ignite, even with direct application of the ignition source. Factors such as body hair or oxygen pooling likely provided the conditions necessary for the surgical fire. Most importantly, the ophthalmic lubricants tested actually protected the corneal epithelium and decreased damage to the conjunctiva and lids.

KW - Operating room fire

KW - Oxygen pooling

KW - Surgical fire

KW - Surgical lubricant

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31944450007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31944450007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.icl.0000175988.66193.72

DO - 10.1097/01.icl.0000175988.66193.72

M3 - Article

C2 - 16284511

AN - SCOPUS:31944450007

VL - 31

SP - 291

EP - 293

JO - Eye and Contact Lense

JF - Eye and Contact Lense

SN - 1542-2321

IS - 6

ER -