Field detection of avian influenza virus in wild birds

Evaluation of a portable rRT-PCR system and freeze-dried reagents

John Y. Takekawa, Samuel A. Iverson, Annie K. Schultz, Nichola J. Hill, Carol J. Cardona, Walter M Boyce, Joseph P. Dudley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wild birds have been implicated in the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAIV) of the H5N1 subtype, prompting surveillance along migratory flyways. Sampling of wild birds is often conducted in remote regions, but results are often delayed because of limited local analytical capabilities, difficulties with sample transportation and permitting, or problems keeping samples cold in the field. In response to these challenges, the performance of a portable real-time, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) unit (RAPID®, Idaho Technologies, Salt Lake City, UT) that employed lyophilized reagents (Influenza A Target 1 Taqman; ASAY-ASY-0109, Idaho Technologies) was compared to virus isolation combined with real-time RT-PCR conducted in a laboratory. This study included both field- and experimental-based sampling. Field samples were collected from migratory shorebirds captured in northern California, while experimental samples were prepared by spiking fecal material with an H6N2 AIV isolate. Results indicated that the portable rRT-PCR unit had equivalent specificity to virus isolation with no false positives, but sensitivity was compromised at low viral titers. Use of portable rRT-PCR with lyophilized reagents may expedite surveillance results, paving the way to a better understanding of wild bird involvement in HPAIV H5N1 transmission.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)92-97
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Virological Methods
Volume166
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Influenza in Birds
Orthomyxoviridae
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Birds
Viruses
Technology
Human Influenza
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Keywords

  • Active surveillance
  • Avian influenza
  • HPAI H5N1
  • Migratory birds
  • Rapid diagnosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Virology

Cite this

Field detection of avian influenza virus in wild birds : Evaluation of a portable rRT-PCR system and freeze-dried reagents. / Takekawa, John Y.; Iverson, Samuel A.; Schultz, Annie K.; Hill, Nichola J.; Cardona, Carol J.; Boyce, Walter M; Dudley, Joseph P.

In: Journal of Virological Methods, Vol. 166, No. 1-2, 06.2010, p. 92-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takekawa, John Y. ; Iverson, Samuel A. ; Schultz, Annie K. ; Hill, Nichola J. ; Cardona, Carol J. ; Boyce, Walter M ; Dudley, Joseph P. / Field detection of avian influenza virus in wild birds : Evaluation of a portable rRT-PCR system and freeze-dried reagents. In: Journal of Virological Methods. 2010 ; Vol. 166, No. 1-2. pp. 92-97.
@article{1ff00127bdcf45d4a28ead0849c535de,
title = "Field detection of avian influenza virus in wild birds: Evaluation of a portable rRT-PCR system and freeze-dried reagents",
abstract = "Wild birds have been implicated in the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAIV) of the H5N1 subtype, prompting surveillance along migratory flyways. Sampling of wild birds is often conducted in remote regions, but results are often delayed because of limited local analytical capabilities, difficulties with sample transportation and permitting, or problems keeping samples cold in the field. In response to these challenges, the performance of a portable real-time, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) unit (RAPID{\circledR}, Idaho Technologies, Salt Lake City, UT) that employed lyophilized reagents (Influenza A Target 1 Taqman; ASAY-ASY-0109, Idaho Technologies) was compared to virus isolation combined with real-time RT-PCR conducted in a laboratory. This study included both field- and experimental-based sampling. Field samples were collected from migratory shorebirds captured in northern California, while experimental samples were prepared by spiking fecal material with an H6N2 AIV isolate. Results indicated that the portable rRT-PCR unit had equivalent specificity to virus isolation with no false positives, but sensitivity was compromised at low viral titers. Use of portable rRT-PCR with lyophilized reagents may expedite surveillance results, paving the way to a better understanding of wild bird involvement in HPAIV H5N1 transmission.",
keywords = "Active surveillance, Avian influenza, HPAI H5N1, Migratory birds, Rapid diagnosis",
author = "Takekawa, {John Y.} and Iverson, {Samuel A.} and Schultz, {Annie K.} and Hill, {Nichola J.} and Cardona, {Carol J.} and Boyce, {Walter M} and Dudley, {Joseph P.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.02.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "166",
pages = "92--97",
journal = "Journal of Virological Methods",
issn = "0166-0934",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field detection of avian influenza virus in wild birds

T2 - Evaluation of a portable rRT-PCR system and freeze-dried reagents

AU - Takekawa, John Y.

AU - Iverson, Samuel A.

AU - Schultz, Annie K.

AU - Hill, Nichola J.

AU - Cardona, Carol J.

AU - Boyce, Walter M

AU - Dudley, Joseph P.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Wild birds have been implicated in the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAIV) of the H5N1 subtype, prompting surveillance along migratory flyways. Sampling of wild birds is often conducted in remote regions, but results are often delayed because of limited local analytical capabilities, difficulties with sample transportation and permitting, or problems keeping samples cold in the field. In response to these challenges, the performance of a portable real-time, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) unit (RAPID®, Idaho Technologies, Salt Lake City, UT) that employed lyophilized reagents (Influenza A Target 1 Taqman; ASAY-ASY-0109, Idaho Technologies) was compared to virus isolation combined with real-time RT-PCR conducted in a laboratory. This study included both field- and experimental-based sampling. Field samples were collected from migratory shorebirds captured in northern California, while experimental samples were prepared by spiking fecal material with an H6N2 AIV isolate. Results indicated that the portable rRT-PCR unit had equivalent specificity to virus isolation with no false positives, but sensitivity was compromised at low viral titers. Use of portable rRT-PCR with lyophilized reagents may expedite surveillance results, paving the way to a better understanding of wild bird involvement in HPAIV H5N1 transmission.

AB - Wild birds have been implicated in the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAIV) of the H5N1 subtype, prompting surveillance along migratory flyways. Sampling of wild birds is often conducted in remote regions, but results are often delayed because of limited local analytical capabilities, difficulties with sample transportation and permitting, or problems keeping samples cold in the field. In response to these challenges, the performance of a portable real-time, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) unit (RAPID®, Idaho Technologies, Salt Lake City, UT) that employed lyophilized reagents (Influenza A Target 1 Taqman; ASAY-ASY-0109, Idaho Technologies) was compared to virus isolation combined with real-time RT-PCR conducted in a laboratory. This study included both field- and experimental-based sampling. Field samples were collected from migratory shorebirds captured in northern California, while experimental samples were prepared by spiking fecal material with an H6N2 AIV isolate. Results indicated that the portable rRT-PCR unit had equivalent specificity to virus isolation with no false positives, but sensitivity was compromised at low viral titers. Use of portable rRT-PCR with lyophilized reagents may expedite surveillance results, paving the way to a better understanding of wild bird involvement in HPAIV H5N1 transmission.

KW - Active surveillance

KW - Avian influenza

KW - HPAI H5N1

KW - Migratory birds

KW - Rapid diagnosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952668949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952668949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.02.029

DO - 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.02.029

M3 - Article

VL - 166

SP - 92

EP - 97

JO - Journal of Virological Methods

JF - Journal of Virological Methods

SN - 0166-0934

IS - 1-2

ER -