Femoral structure and stiffness in patients with femoral neck fracture

Dianna D. Cody, Fu J. Hou, George W. Divine, David P Fyhrie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bone morphological characteristics may relate to the risk of hip fracture. We applied finite element modeling to radiologic data for two groups of women in vivo to address two questions: (a) Do individuals who have just sustained a femoral neck fracture exhibit reduced three-dimensional structural stiffness? and (b) Are victims of hip fracture disproportionately more susceptible to loads sustained in a fall than to stance-type loads? Ten white women (age: 64-76 years) who had just sustained a femoral neck fracture and 18 female volunteers (age: 65-76 years), matched as groups for race, age, and body mass index, were evaluated. From quantitative computed tomography scans, femoral morphometric and volumetric cancellous density measurements were obtained and a finite element model was constructed. Two load conditions were simulated: single-stance phase and lateral fall. Global stiffness values were determined for each model. The cancellous bone density was significantly lower at the femoral neck and the femoral neck and head diameters were significantly larger in the women in the fracture group than in those in the control group. The stiffness of the proximal femur did not differ significantly between the groups for either load condition. An apparently linear relationship was found for stiffness at stance load compared with stiffness at fall load (r = 0.84, p < 0.001), and slopes did not differ significantly between the groups. Although cancellous density was reduced at the fracture site in patients with femoral neck fractures, this did not result in a reduction in the predicted bone stiffness. Previous studies have established a very strong relationship between the stiffness and strength of bone. Since these modeling methods were thoroughly validated ex vivo, we conclude that although decreased bone density at the femoral neck may predict where fracture initiates, the risk of hip fracture per se may be more strongly dependent on issues such as the risk of falling and fall biomechanics than on the structural characteristics of bone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-448
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Research
Volume18
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Femoral Neck Fractures
Thigh
Femur Neck
Hip Fractures
Bone and Bones
Bone Density
Accidental Falls
Biomechanical Phenomena
Femur
Volunteers
Body Mass Index
Research Design
Head
Tomography
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Femoral structure and stiffness in patients with femoral neck fracture. / Cody, Dianna D.; Hou, Fu J.; Divine, George W.; Fyhrie, David P.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, 05.2000, p. 443-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cody, Dianna D. ; Hou, Fu J. ; Divine, George W. ; Fyhrie, David P. / Femoral structure and stiffness in patients with femoral neck fracture. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2000 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 443-448.
@article{c3223e6388614d7888fcce7190a7842b,
title = "Femoral structure and stiffness in patients with femoral neck fracture",
abstract = "Bone morphological characteristics may relate to the risk of hip fracture. We applied finite element modeling to radiologic data for two groups of women in vivo to address two questions: (a) Do individuals who have just sustained a femoral neck fracture exhibit reduced three-dimensional structural stiffness? and (b) Are victims of hip fracture disproportionately more susceptible to loads sustained in a fall than to stance-type loads? Ten white women (age: 64-76 years) who had just sustained a femoral neck fracture and 18 female volunteers (age: 65-76 years), matched as groups for race, age, and body mass index, were evaluated. From quantitative computed tomography scans, femoral morphometric and volumetric cancellous density measurements were obtained and a finite element model was constructed. Two load conditions were simulated: single-stance phase and lateral fall. Global stiffness values were determined for each model. The cancellous bone density was significantly lower at the femoral neck and the femoral neck and head diameters were significantly larger in the women in the fracture group than in those in the control group. The stiffness of the proximal femur did not differ significantly between the groups for either load condition. An apparently linear relationship was found for stiffness at stance load compared with stiffness at fall load (r = 0.84, p < 0.001), and slopes did not differ significantly between the groups. Although cancellous density was reduced at the fracture site in patients with femoral neck fractures, this did not result in a reduction in the predicted bone stiffness. Previous studies have established a very strong relationship between the stiffness and strength of bone. Since these modeling methods were thoroughly validated ex vivo, we conclude that although decreased bone density at the femoral neck may predict where fracture initiates, the risk of hip fracture per se may be more strongly dependent on issues such as the risk of falling and fall biomechanics than on the structural characteristics of bone.",
author = "Cody, {Dianna D.} and Hou, {Fu J.} and Divine, {George W.} and Fyhrie, {David P}",
year = "2000",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "443--448",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Research",
issn = "0736-0266",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Femoral structure and stiffness in patients with femoral neck fracture

AU - Cody, Dianna D.

AU - Hou, Fu J.

AU - Divine, George W.

AU - Fyhrie, David P

PY - 2000/5

Y1 - 2000/5

N2 - Bone morphological characteristics may relate to the risk of hip fracture. We applied finite element modeling to radiologic data for two groups of women in vivo to address two questions: (a) Do individuals who have just sustained a femoral neck fracture exhibit reduced three-dimensional structural stiffness? and (b) Are victims of hip fracture disproportionately more susceptible to loads sustained in a fall than to stance-type loads? Ten white women (age: 64-76 years) who had just sustained a femoral neck fracture and 18 female volunteers (age: 65-76 years), matched as groups for race, age, and body mass index, were evaluated. From quantitative computed tomography scans, femoral morphometric and volumetric cancellous density measurements were obtained and a finite element model was constructed. Two load conditions were simulated: single-stance phase and lateral fall. Global stiffness values were determined for each model. The cancellous bone density was significantly lower at the femoral neck and the femoral neck and head diameters were significantly larger in the women in the fracture group than in those in the control group. The stiffness of the proximal femur did not differ significantly between the groups for either load condition. An apparently linear relationship was found for stiffness at stance load compared with stiffness at fall load (r = 0.84, p < 0.001), and slopes did not differ significantly between the groups. Although cancellous density was reduced at the fracture site in patients with femoral neck fractures, this did not result in a reduction in the predicted bone stiffness. Previous studies have established a very strong relationship between the stiffness and strength of bone. Since these modeling methods were thoroughly validated ex vivo, we conclude that although decreased bone density at the femoral neck may predict where fracture initiates, the risk of hip fracture per se may be more strongly dependent on issues such as the risk of falling and fall biomechanics than on the structural characteristics of bone.

AB - Bone morphological characteristics may relate to the risk of hip fracture. We applied finite element modeling to radiologic data for two groups of women in vivo to address two questions: (a) Do individuals who have just sustained a femoral neck fracture exhibit reduced three-dimensional structural stiffness? and (b) Are victims of hip fracture disproportionately more susceptible to loads sustained in a fall than to stance-type loads? Ten white women (age: 64-76 years) who had just sustained a femoral neck fracture and 18 female volunteers (age: 65-76 years), matched as groups for race, age, and body mass index, were evaluated. From quantitative computed tomography scans, femoral morphometric and volumetric cancellous density measurements were obtained and a finite element model was constructed. Two load conditions were simulated: single-stance phase and lateral fall. Global stiffness values were determined for each model. The cancellous bone density was significantly lower at the femoral neck and the femoral neck and head diameters were significantly larger in the women in the fracture group than in those in the control group. The stiffness of the proximal femur did not differ significantly between the groups for either load condition. An apparently linear relationship was found for stiffness at stance load compared with stiffness at fall load (r = 0.84, p < 0.001), and slopes did not differ significantly between the groups. Although cancellous density was reduced at the fracture site in patients with femoral neck fractures, this did not result in a reduction in the predicted bone stiffness. Previous studies have established a very strong relationship between the stiffness and strength of bone. Since these modeling methods were thoroughly validated ex vivo, we conclude that although decreased bone density at the femoral neck may predict where fracture initiates, the risk of hip fracture per se may be more strongly dependent on issues such as the risk of falling and fall biomechanics than on the structural characteristics of bone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034190358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034190358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10937632

AN - SCOPUS:0034190358

VL - 18

SP - 443

EP - 448

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Research

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Research

SN - 0736-0266

IS - 3

ER -