FemCap™ with removal strap: Ease of removal, safety and acceptability

Christine K. Mauck, Debra H. Weiner, Mitchell D Creinin, David F. Archer, Jill L. Schwartz, Helen C. Pymar, Susan A. Ballagh, Deborah M. Henry, Marianne M. Callahan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: FemCap™ is a silicone-rubber barrier contraceptive approved for marketing in the United States. To address reported problems with removal and dislodgment, the device's developer added a strap to the device and increased the height of the brim. This trial assessed whether the new design reduced removal difficulties and had any effects on dislodgment, genital pain/discomfort, safety, and acceptability. Methods: Women used the strapped device for 8 weeks with follow-up visits at 2 and 8 weeks. Outcome measures were obtained through diary cards, questionnaires, and naked eye examination. Data from these 120 women were compared with data from 419 women who used the unstrapped FemCap in a previous contraceptive effectiveness study. Results: The strapped device was not significantly easier for users to remove than the unstrapped device. Similar odds of dislodgment and cervical/vaginal irritation were seen with the two devices. Both female and male participants were significantly more likely to report pain/discomfort with use of the strapped device. Female users of the strapped device were significantly more likely to say they disliked their device. In six weeks, two pregnancies were observed, but pregnancy was not an endpoint in the study and no conclusions should be drawn regarding pregnancy rates. Conclusions: The modifications to the FemCap did not significantly improve the ease of device removal and appears to have resulted in significantly more female and male partner pain/discomfort and decreased acceptability, compared with the unstrapped device.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-64
Number of pages6
JournalContraception
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Safety
Equipment and Supplies
Device Removal
Contraceptive Agents
Pain
Silicone Elastomers
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Marketing
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Barrier
  • Contraception
  • Device
  • Diaphragm
  • FemCap
  • Vagina

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Mauck, C. K., Weiner, D. H., Creinin, M. D., Archer, D. F., Schwartz, J. L., Pymar, H. C., ... Callahan, M. M. (2006). FemCap™ with removal strap: Ease of removal, safety and acceptability. Contraception, 73(1), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2005.06.074

FemCap™ with removal strap : Ease of removal, safety and acceptability. / Mauck, Christine K.; Weiner, Debra H.; Creinin, Mitchell D; Archer, David F.; Schwartz, Jill L.; Pymar, Helen C.; Ballagh, Susan A.; Henry, Deborah M.; Callahan, Marianne M.

In: Contraception, Vol. 73, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 59-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mauck, CK, Weiner, DH, Creinin, MD, Archer, DF, Schwartz, JL, Pymar, HC, Ballagh, SA, Henry, DM & Callahan, MM 2006, 'FemCap™ with removal strap: Ease of removal, safety and acceptability', Contraception, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2005.06.074
Mauck, Christine K. ; Weiner, Debra H. ; Creinin, Mitchell D ; Archer, David F. ; Schwartz, Jill L. ; Pymar, Helen C. ; Ballagh, Susan A. ; Henry, Deborah M. ; Callahan, Marianne M. / FemCap™ with removal strap : Ease of removal, safety and acceptability. In: Contraception. 2006 ; Vol. 73, No. 1. pp. 59-64.
@article{5808b47d098d46638becf67f12825596,
title = "FemCap™ with removal strap: Ease of removal, safety and acceptability",
abstract = "Objectives: FemCap™ is a silicone-rubber barrier contraceptive approved for marketing in the United States. To address reported problems with removal and dislodgment, the device's developer added a strap to the device and increased the height of the brim. This trial assessed whether the new design reduced removal difficulties and had any effects on dislodgment, genital pain/discomfort, safety, and acceptability. Methods: Women used the strapped device for 8 weeks with follow-up visits at 2 and 8 weeks. Outcome measures were obtained through diary cards, questionnaires, and naked eye examination. Data from these 120 women were compared with data from 419 women who used the unstrapped FemCap in a previous contraceptive effectiveness study. Results: The strapped device was not significantly easier for users to remove than the unstrapped device. Similar odds of dislodgment and cervical/vaginal irritation were seen with the two devices. Both female and male participants were significantly more likely to report pain/discomfort with use of the strapped device. Female users of the strapped device were significantly more likely to say they disliked their device. In six weeks, two pregnancies were observed, but pregnancy was not an endpoint in the study and no conclusions should be drawn regarding pregnancy rates. Conclusions: The modifications to the FemCap did not significantly improve the ease of device removal and appears to have resulted in significantly more female and male partner pain/discomfort and decreased acceptability, compared with the unstrapped device.",
keywords = "Barrier, Contraception, Device, Diaphragm, FemCap, Vagina",
author = "Mauck, {Christine K.} and Weiner, {Debra H.} and Creinin, {Mitchell D} and Archer, {David F.} and Schwartz, {Jill L.} and Pymar, {Helen C.} and Ballagh, {Susan A.} and Henry, {Deborah M.} and Callahan, {Marianne M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2005.06.074",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "59--64",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - FemCap™ with removal strap

T2 - Ease of removal, safety and acceptability

AU - Mauck, Christine K.

AU - Weiner, Debra H.

AU - Creinin, Mitchell D

AU - Archer, David F.

AU - Schwartz, Jill L.

AU - Pymar, Helen C.

AU - Ballagh, Susan A.

AU - Henry, Deborah M.

AU - Callahan, Marianne M.

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Objectives: FemCap™ is a silicone-rubber barrier contraceptive approved for marketing in the United States. To address reported problems with removal and dislodgment, the device's developer added a strap to the device and increased the height of the brim. This trial assessed whether the new design reduced removal difficulties and had any effects on dislodgment, genital pain/discomfort, safety, and acceptability. Methods: Women used the strapped device for 8 weeks with follow-up visits at 2 and 8 weeks. Outcome measures were obtained through diary cards, questionnaires, and naked eye examination. Data from these 120 women were compared with data from 419 women who used the unstrapped FemCap in a previous contraceptive effectiveness study. Results: The strapped device was not significantly easier for users to remove than the unstrapped device. Similar odds of dislodgment and cervical/vaginal irritation were seen with the two devices. Both female and male participants were significantly more likely to report pain/discomfort with use of the strapped device. Female users of the strapped device were significantly more likely to say they disliked their device. In six weeks, two pregnancies were observed, but pregnancy was not an endpoint in the study and no conclusions should be drawn regarding pregnancy rates. Conclusions: The modifications to the FemCap did not significantly improve the ease of device removal and appears to have resulted in significantly more female and male partner pain/discomfort and decreased acceptability, compared with the unstrapped device.

AB - Objectives: FemCap™ is a silicone-rubber barrier contraceptive approved for marketing in the United States. To address reported problems with removal and dislodgment, the device's developer added a strap to the device and increased the height of the brim. This trial assessed whether the new design reduced removal difficulties and had any effects on dislodgment, genital pain/discomfort, safety, and acceptability. Methods: Women used the strapped device for 8 weeks with follow-up visits at 2 and 8 weeks. Outcome measures were obtained through diary cards, questionnaires, and naked eye examination. Data from these 120 women were compared with data from 419 women who used the unstrapped FemCap in a previous contraceptive effectiveness study. Results: The strapped device was not significantly easier for users to remove than the unstrapped device. Similar odds of dislodgment and cervical/vaginal irritation were seen with the two devices. Both female and male participants were significantly more likely to report pain/discomfort with use of the strapped device. Female users of the strapped device were significantly more likely to say they disliked their device. In six weeks, two pregnancies were observed, but pregnancy was not an endpoint in the study and no conclusions should be drawn regarding pregnancy rates. Conclusions: The modifications to the FemCap did not significantly improve the ease of device removal and appears to have resulted in significantly more female and male partner pain/discomfort and decreased acceptability, compared with the unstrapped device.

KW - Barrier

KW - Contraception

KW - Device

KW - Diaphragm

KW - FemCap

KW - Vagina

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29144447466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29144447466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.06.074

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.06.074

M3 - Article

C2 - 16371297

AN - SCOPUS:29144447466

VL - 73

SP - 59

EP - 64

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 1

ER -