Fecal DNA analysis and risk assessment of mountain lion predation of bighorn sheep

Holly B Ernest, Esther S. Rubin, Walter M Boyce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We analyzed fecal DNA to identify individual mountain lions (Puma concolor) associated with kills of federally listed endangered bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in the Peninsular Ranges of California from 1993-1999. We identified 18 different mountain lions at 26 bighorn sheep kill sites, as well as 5 mountain lions not associated with bighorn sheep mortalities. Thirteen genotypes were each identified at only 1 kill site, while 2 genotypes were unambiguously detected at multiple kill sites. We developed a Monte Carlo simulation model incorporating the DNA data to evaluate the benefits (bighorn sheep saved and reduction in extinction risk) and costs (mountain lions removed) of mountain lion removal under 2 management strategies for a 5-year period. One strategy removed individual mountain lions only after they killed 1 bighorn sheep (kill-site removal), while the other strategy removed mountain lions found anywhere in bighorn sheep habitat (habitat removal). The habitat removal strategy was equal or superior to the kill-site removal in terms of reducing extinction risk for all sizes of ewe populations. However, the kill-site strategy more efficiently targeted bighorn sheep predators and resulted in the removal of fewer non-bighorn sheep-killing mountain lions than the less selective habitat removal strategy. Removal of 1-2 mountain lions per year by either strategy effectively decreased extinction risk for populations consisting of 15-30 ewes, while more intensive removal (3-4 mountain lions per year) was necessary to reduce the risk for smaller populations containing <15 ewes. Removal of mountain lions for a short period of time may be the best option available for bighorn sheep populations in immediate danger of extinction due to mountain lion predation. Given that site-specific information and several assumptions were incorporated in our model, we strongly recommend that individualized and updated assessments be performed on the potential costs and benefits of predator control actions so that the rescue of 1 species or population does not jeopardize another.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-85
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume66
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Ovis canadensis
Puma concolor
sheep
risk assessment
predation
DNA
mountain
extinction risk
extinction
ewes
habitat
habitats
analysis
genotype
removal
predator control
cost
simulation models

Keywords

  • California
  • Fecal DNA
  • Microsatellites
  • Monte Carlo simulation
  • Mountain lion
  • Mountain sheep
  • Ovis canadensis
  • Peninsular Ranges
  • Predator control
  • Puma concolor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology

Cite this

Fecal DNA analysis and risk assessment of mountain lion predation of bighorn sheep. / Ernest, Holly B; Rubin, Esther S.; Boyce, Walter M.

In: Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 66, No. 1, 2002, p. 75-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44b274cd1ec24d019416da0ad4c0892b,
title = "Fecal DNA analysis and risk assessment of mountain lion predation of bighorn sheep",
abstract = "We analyzed fecal DNA to identify individual mountain lions (Puma concolor) associated with kills of federally listed endangered bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in the Peninsular Ranges of California from 1993-1999. We identified 18 different mountain lions at 26 bighorn sheep kill sites, as well as 5 mountain lions not associated with bighorn sheep mortalities. Thirteen genotypes were each identified at only 1 kill site, while 2 genotypes were unambiguously detected at multiple kill sites. We developed a Monte Carlo simulation model incorporating the DNA data to evaluate the benefits (bighorn sheep saved and reduction in extinction risk) and costs (mountain lions removed) of mountain lion removal under 2 management strategies for a 5-year period. One strategy removed individual mountain lions only after they killed 1 bighorn sheep (kill-site removal), while the other strategy removed mountain lions found anywhere in bighorn sheep habitat (habitat removal). The habitat removal strategy was equal or superior to the kill-site removal in terms of reducing extinction risk for all sizes of ewe populations. However, the kill-site strategy more efficiently targeted bighorn sheep predators and resulted in the removal of fewer non-bighorn sheep-killing mountain lions than the less selective habitat removal strategy. Removal of 1-2 mountain lions per year by either strategy effectively decreased extinction risk for populations consisting of 15-30 ewes, while more intensive removal (3-4 mountain lions per year) was necessary to reduce the risk for smaller populations containing <15 ewes. Removal of mountain lions for a short period of time may be the best option available for bighorn sheep populations in immediate danger of extinction due to mountain lion predation. Given that site-specific information and several assumptions were incorporated in our model, we strongly recommend that individualized and updated assessments be performed on the potential costs and benefits of predator control actions so that the rescue of 1 species or population does not jeopardize another.",
keywords = "California, Fecal DNA, Microsatellites, Monte Carlo simulation, Mountain lion, Mountain sheep, Ovis canadensis, Peninsular Ranges, Predator control, Puma concolor",
author = "Ernest, {Holly B} and Rubin, {Esther S.} and Boyce, {Walter M}",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "75--85",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Management",
issn = "0022-541X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fecal DNA analysis and risk assessment of mountain lion predation of bighorn sheep

AU - Ernest, Holly B

AU - Rubin, Esther S.

AU - Boyce, Walter M

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - We analyzed fecal DNA to identify individual mountain lions (Puma concolor) associated with kills of federally listed endangered bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in the Peninsular Ranges of California from 1993-1999. We identified 18 different mountain lions at 26 bighorn sheep kill sites, as well as 5 mountain lions not associated with bighorn sheep mortalities. Thirteen genotypes were each identified at only 1 kill site, while 2 genotypes were unambiguously detected at multiple kill sites. We developed a Monte Carlo simulation model incorporating the DNA data to evaluate the benefits (bighorn sheep saved and reduction in extinction risk) and costs (mountain lions removed) of mountain lion removal under 2 management strategies for a 5-year period. One strategy removed individual mountain lions only after they killed 1 bighorn sheep (kill-site removal), while the other strategy removed mountain lions found anywhere in bighorn sheep habitat (habitat removal). The habitat removal strategy was equal or superior to the kill-site removal in terms of reducing extinction risk for all sizes of ewe populations. However, the kill-site strategy more efficiently targeted bighorn sheep predators and resulted in the removal of fewer non-bighorn sheep-killing mountain lions than the less selective habitat removal strategy. Removal of 1-2 mountain lions per year by either strategy effectively decreased extinction risk for populations consisting of 15-30 ewes, while more intensive removal (3-4 mountain lions per year) was necessary to reduce the risk for smaller populations containing <15 ewes. Removal of mountain lions for a short period of time may be the best option available for bighorn sheep populations in immediate danger of extinction due to mountain lion predation. Given that site-specific information and several assumptions were incorporated in our model, we strongly recommend that individualized and updated assessments be performed on the potential costs and benefits of predator control actions so that the rescue of 1 species or population does not jeopardize another.

AB - We analyzed fecal DNA to identify individual mountain lions (Puma concolor) associated with kills of federally listed endangered bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in the Peninsular Ranges of California from 1993-1999. We identified 18 different mountain lions at 26 bighorn sheep kill sites, as well as 5 mountain lions not associated with bighorn sheep mortalities. Thirteen genotypes were each identified at only 1 kill site, while 2 genotypes were unambiguously detected at multiple kill sites. We developed a Monte Carlo simulation model incorporating the DNA data to evaluate the benefits (bighorn sheep saved and reduction in extinction risk) and costs (mountain lions removed) of mountain lion removal under 2 management strategies for a 5-year period. One strategy removed individual mountain lions only after they killed 1 bighorn sheep (kill-site removal), while the other strategy removed mountain lions found anywhere in bighorn sheep habitat (habitat removal). The habitat removal strategy was equal or superior to the kill-site removal in terms of reducing extinction risk for all sizes of ewe populations. However, the kill-site strategy more efficiently targeted bighorn sheep predators and resulted in the removal of fewer non-bighorn sheep-killing mountain lions than the less selective habitat removal strategy. Removal of 1-2 mountain lions per year by either strategy effectively decreased extinction risk for populations consisting of 15-30 ewes, while more intensive removal (3-4 mountain lions per year) was necessary to reduce the risk for smaller populations containing <15 ewes. Removal of mountain lions for a short period of time may be the best option available for bighorn sheep populations in immediate danger of extinction due to mountain lion predation. Given that site-specific information and several assumptions were incorporated in our model, we strongly recommend that individualized and updated assessments be performed on the potential costs and benefits of predator control actions so that the rescue of 1 species or population does not jeopardize another.

KW - California

KW - Fecal DNA

KW - Microsatellites

KW - Monte Carlo simulation

KW - Mountain lion

KW - Mountain sheep

KW - Ovis canadensis

KW - Peninsular Ranges

KW - Predator control

KW - Puma concolor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036181053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036181053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036181053

VL - 66

SP - 75

EP - 85

JO - Journal of Wildlife Management

JF - Journal of Wildlife Management

SN - 0022-541X

IS - 1

ER -