Feasibility of the Preoperative Mallampati Airway Assessment in Emergency Department Patients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Multiple predictors have been proposed to assist in identifying patient features that would predict difficult airway management. The Mallampati score (MS) has been shown to be useful in the preoperative assessment of patients being intubated in the operating room. Objective: We sought to define the feasibility of this assessment in the Emergency Department. Methods: A prospective, observational study was performed on all patients being intubated at a university Level I trauma center over a period of 6 months. We recorded and calculated the proportion of patients who were successfully assessed using the MS. Reasons given by individual intubators for failure to assess were recorded. We also tracked patient characteristics between groups and complication rates. Results: Of 328 patients, 32 (10%) were excluded due to incomplete data. Among the remaining 296, 58% were intubated for non-trauma indications, 70% were male, and the mean age was 45.9 years. Only 76 of 296 (26%) (95% confidence interval 21-31%) were able to have the MS performed. Lack of patient cooperation and clinical instability were listed as factors that precluded evaluation in patients whose assessment was unsuccessful. The frequency of procedure-related minor events did not differ significantly between the assessed and non-assessed groups. Major events included two cricothyrotomies in the non-assessed group. Conclusions: We were unable to perform a Mallampati assessment in three-quarters of our patients requiring emergency intubation. These findings call into question the feasibility of the standard Mallampati assessment in the practice of Emergency Medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)677-680
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Airway Management
Emergency Medicine
Trauma Centers
Operating Rooms
Patient Compliance
Intubation
Observational Studies
Emergencies
Prospective Studies
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • airway management
  • emergency intubation
  • preoperative assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Feasibility of the Preoperative Mallampati Airway Assessment in Emergency Department Patients. / Bair, Aaron E; Caravelli, Rebekah; Tyler, Katren R; Laurin, Erik G.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 38, No. 5, 06.2010, p. 677-680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47cc89ae64bf47ee88595d0e7fac170c,
title = "Feasibility of the Preoperative Mallampati Airway Assessment in Emergency Department Patients",
abstract = "Background: Multiple predictors have been proposed to assist in identifying patient features that would predict difficult airway management. The Mallampati score (MS) has been shown to be useful in the preoperative assessment of patients being intubated in the operating room. Objective: We sought to define the feasibility of this assessment in the Emergency Department. Methods: A prospective, observational study was performed on all patients being intubated at a university Level I trauma center over a period of 6 months. We recorded and calculated the proportion of patients who were successfully assessed using the MS. Reasons given by individual intubators for failure to assess were recorded. We also tracked patient characteristics between groups and complication rates. Results: Of 328 patients, 32 (10{\%}) were excluded due to incomplete data. Among the remaining 296, 58{\%} were intubated for non-trauma indications, 70{\%} were male, and the mean age was 45.9 years. Only 76 of 296 (26{\%}) (95{\%} confidence interval 21-31{\%}) were able to have the MS performed. Lack of patient cooperation and clinical instability were listed as factors that precluded evaluation in patients whose assessment was unsuccessful. The frequency of procedure-related minor events did not differ significantly between the assessed and non-assessed groups. Major events included two cricothyrotomies in the non-assessed group. Conclusions: We were unable to perform a Mallampati assessment in three-quarters of our patients requiring emergency intubation. These findings call into question the feasibility of the standard Mallampati assessment in the practice of Emergency Medicine.",
keywords = "airway management, emergency intubation, preoperative assessment",
author = "Bair, {Aaron E} and Rebekah Caravelli and Tyler, {Katren R} and Laurin, {Erik G}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.12.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "677--680",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of the Preoperative Mallampati Airway Assessment in Emergency Department Patients

AU - Bair, Aaron E

AU - Caravelli, Rebekah

AU - Tyler, Katren R

AU - Laurin, Erik G

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Background: Multiple predictors have been proposed to assist in identifying patient features that would predict difficult airway management. The Mallampati score (MS) has been shown to be useful in the preoperative assessment of patients being intubated in the operating room. Objective: We sought to define the feasibility of this assessment in the Emergency Department. Methods: A prospective, observational study was performed on all patients being intubated at a university Level I trauma center over a period of 6 months. We recorded and calculated the proportion of patients who were successfully assessed using the MS. Reasons given by individual intubators for failure to assess were recorded. We also tracked patient characteristics between groups and complication rates. Results: Of 328 patients, 32 (10%) were excluded due to incomplete data. Among the remaining 296, 58% were intubated for non-trauma indications, 70% were male, and the mean age was 45.9 years. Only 76 of 296 (26%) (95% confidence interval 21-31%) were able to have the MS performed. Lack of patient cooperation and clinical instability were listed as factors that precluded evaluation in patients whose assessment was unsuccessful. The frequency of procedure-related minor events did not differ significantly between the assessed and non-assessed groups. Major events included two cricothyrotomies in the non-assessed group. Conclusions: We were unable to perform a Mallampati assessment in three-quarters of our patients requiring emergency intubation. These findings call into question the feasibility of the standard Mallampati assessment in the practice of Emergency Medicine.

AB - Background: Multiple predictors have been proposed to assist in identifying patient features that would predict difficult airway management. The Mallampati score (MS) has been shown to be useful in the preoperative assessment of patients being intubated in the operating room. Objective: We sought to define the feasibility of this assessment in the Emergency Department. Methods: A prospective, observational study was performed on all patients being intubated at a university Level I trauma center over a period of 6 months. We recorded and calculated the proportion of patients who were successfully assessed using the MS. Reasons given by individual intubators for failure to assess were recorded. We also tracked patient characteristics between groups and complication rates. Results: Of 328 patients, 32 (10%) were excluded due to incomplete data. Among the remaining 296, 58% were intubated for non-trauma indications, 70% were male, and the mean age was 45.9 years. Only 76 of 296 (26%) (95% confidence interval 21-31%) were able to have the MS performed. Lack of patient cooperation and clinical instability were listed as factors that precluded evaluation in patients whose assessment was unsuccessful. The frequency of procedure-related minor events did not differ significantly between the assessed and non-assessed groups. Major events included two cricothyrotomies in the non-assessed group. Conclusions: We were unable to perform a Mallampati assessment in three-quarters of our patients requiring emergency intubation. These findings call into question the feasibility of the standard Mallampati assessment in the practice of Emergency Medicine.

KW - airway management

KW - emergency intubation

KW - preoperative assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952675295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952675295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.12.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.12.019

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 677

EP - 680

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 5

ER -