Feasibility of a family-centered intervention for depressed older men in primary care

W Ladson Hinton, Erika La Frano, Danielle J Harvey, Eduardo Delgadillo Alfaro, Richard L Kravitz, Andrew Smith, Ester Carolina Apesoa-Varano, Asma Jafri, Jurgen Unutzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Families provide considerable support to many older adults with depression, yet few intervention studies have sought to include them. Family participation in depression treatment aligns with the preferences of older men, a group at high risk for depression under treatment. This study examined the feasibility of a family-centered depression intervention for older men in a primary care setting. Methods: A clinical trial was conducted in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in California's Central Valley. Depressed older men (age 50 and older) were allocated to usual care enhanced by depression psychoeducation or a family-centered depression intervention delivered by a licensed clinical social worker. Intervention feasibility was assessed in terms of recruitment, retention, and extent of family engagement. The PHQ-9 was administered at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: For more than 6 months, 45 men were referred to the study; 31 met the inclusion criteria, 23 were successfully enrolled, and 20 (88%) participated in more than or equal to one treatment sessions. Overall, 85% (11 of 13) of men allocated to the intervention engaged a family member in more than or equal to one session and 54% (7 of 13) engaged the family member in more than or equal to three sessions. While men in both groups showed evidence of a significant decline in PHQ-9 scores early on, which attenuated over time, there were no significant between group differences. Conclusions: Our family-centered depression intervention showed acceptable feasibility on the basis of a variety of parameters. Future research on family-based approaches may benefit from longer duration and more intensive treatment as well as additional strategies to overcome recruitment barriers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Depression
Feasibility Studies
Therapeutics
Clinical Trials
Health

Keywords

  • depression
  • family
  • interventions
  • men
  • primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Feasibility of a family-centered intervention for depressed older men in primary care. / Hinton, W Ladson; La Frano, Erika; Harvey, Danielle J; Alfaro, Eduardo Delgadillo; Kravitz, Richard L; Smith, Andrew; Apesoa-Varano, Ester Carolina; Jafri, Asma; Unutzer, Jurgen.

In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c404eb44efd449690e8e7d07012a396,
title = "Feasibility of a family-centered intervention for depressed older men in primary care",
abstract = "Objective: Families provide considerable support to many older adults with depression, yet few intervention studies have sought to include them. Family participation in depression treatment aligns with the preferences of older men, a group at high risk for depression under treatment. This study examined the feasibility of a family-centered depression intervention for older men in a primary care setting. Methods: A clinical trial was conducted in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in California's Central Valley. Depressed older men (age 50 and older) were allocated to usual care enhanced by depression psychoeducation or a family-centered depression intervention delivered by a licensed clinical social worker. Intervention feasibility was assessed in terms of recruitment, retention, and extent of family engagement. The PHQ-9 was administered at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: For more than 6 months, 45 men were referred to the study; 31 met the inclusion criteria, 23 were successfully enrolled, and 20 (88{\%}) participated in more than or equal to one treatment sessions. Overall, 85{\%} (11 of 13) of men allocated to the intervention engaged a family member in more than or equal to one session and 54{\%} (7 of 13) engaged the family member in more than or equal to three sessions. While men in both groups showed evidence of a significant decline in PHQ-9 scores early on, which attenuated over time, there were no significant between group differences. Conclusions: Our family-centered depression intervention showed acceptable feasibility on the basis of a variety of parameters. Future research on family-based approaches may benefit from longer duration and more intensive treatment as well as additional strategies to overcome recruitment barriers.",
keywords = "depression, family, interventions, men, primary care",
author = "Hinton, {W Ladson} and {La Frano}, Erika and Harvey, {Danielle J} and Alfaro, {Eduardo Delgadillo} and Kravitz, {Richard L} and Andrew Smith and Apesoa-Varano, {Ester Carolina} and Asma Jafri and Jurgen Unutzer",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/gps.5196",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "0885-6230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of a family-centered intervention for depressed older men in primary care

AU - Hinton, W Ladson

AU - La Frano, Erika

AU - Harvey, Danielle J

AU - Alfaro, Eduardo Delgadillo

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Smith, Andrew

AU - Apesoa-Varano, Ester Carolina

AU - Jafri, Asma

AU - Unutzer, Jurgen

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: Families provide considerable support to many older adults with depression, yet few intervention studies have sought to include them. Family participation in depression treatment aligns with the preferences of older men, a group at high risk for depression under treatment. This study examined the feasibility of a family-centered depression intervention for older men in a primary care setting. Methods: A clinical trial was conducted in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in California's Central Valley. Depressed older men (age 50 and older) were allocated to usual care enhanced by depression psychoeducation or a family-centered depression intervention delivered by a licensed clinical social worker. Intervention feasibility was assessed in terms of recruitment, retention, and extent of family engagement. The PHQ-9 was administered at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: For more than 6 months, 45 men were referred to the study; 31 met the inclusion criteria, 23 were successfully enrolled, and 20 (88%) participated in more than or equal to one treatment sessions. Overall, 85% (11 of 13) of men allocated to the intervention engaged a family member in more than or equal to one session and 54% (7 of 13) engaged the family member in more than or equal to three sessions. While men in both groups showed evidence of a significant decline in PHQ-9 scores early on, which attenuated over time, there were no significant between group differences. Conclusions: Our family-centered depression intervention showed acceptable feasibility on the basis of a variety of parameters. Future research on family-based approaches may benefit from longer duration and more intensive treatment as well as additional strategies to overcome recruitment barriers.

AB - Objective: Families provide considerable support to many older adults with depression, yet few intervention studies have sought to include them. Family participation in depression treatment aligns with the preferences of older men, a group at high risk for depression under treatment. This study examined the feasibility of a family-centered depression intervention for older men in a primary care setting. Methods: A clinical trial was conducted in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in California's Central Valley. Depressed older men (age 50 and older) were allocated to usual care enhanced by depression psychoeducation or a family-centered depression intervention delivered by a licensed clinical social worker. Intervention feasibility was assessed in terms of recruitment, retention, and extent of family engagement. The PHQ-9 was administered at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: For more than 6 months, 45 men were referred to the study; 31 met the inclusion criteria, 23 were successfully enrolled, and 20 (88%) participated in more than or equal to one treatment sessions. Overall, 85% (11 of 13) of men allocated to the intervention engaged a family member in more than or equal to one session and 54% (7 of 13) engaged the family member in more than or equal to three sessions. While men in both groups showed evidence of a significant decline in PHQ-9 scores early on, which attenuated over time, there were no significant between group differences. Conclusions: Our family-centered depression intervention showed acceptable feasibility on the basis of a variety of parameters. Future research on family-based approaches may benefit from longer duration and more intensive treatment as well as additional strategies to overcome recruitment barriers.

KW - depression

KW - family

KW - interventions

KW - men

KW - primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070960166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070960166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/gps.5196

DO - 10.1002/gps.5196

M3 - Article

C2 - 31414506

AN - SCOPUS:85070960166

JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 0885-6230

ER -