Fat embolism syndrome: A 10-year review

Eileen M. Bulger, Douglas G. Smith, Ronald V. Maier, Gregory Jurkovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

182 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The effect of recent advances in critical care and the emphasis on early fracture fixation in patients with fat embolism syndrome (FES) are unknown. Objective: To better define FES in current practice by conducting a 10-year review of the experiences at our level I trauma center. Design: The medical records of all patients in whom FES was diagnosed from July 1, 1985, to July 1, 1995, were reviewed for demographics, injury severity and pattern, diagnostic criteria, and management. Setting: A level I trauma center. Result: Twenty-seven patients with clinically apparent FES were identified. This resulted in an incidence of 0.9% of all patients with long-bone fractures. The mean injury severity score was 9.5 (range, 4-22). The diagnosis of FES was made by clinical criteria, including hypoxia, 26 patients (96%); mental status changes, 16 patients (59%); petechiae, 9 patients (33%); temperature higher than 39°C, 19 patients (70%); tachycardia (heart rate >120 beats per minute), 25 patients (93%); thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150x 109/L), 10 patients (37%); and unexplained anemia, 18 patients (67%). Thirteen patients (48%) had multiple long-bone fractures, and 14 patients (52%) had a single long-bone fracture. Seven patients (26%) had open fractures, 15 (56%) had closed fractures, and the remaining 5 (18%) had both. Of the total fracture population, the distribution was 81% closed, 15% open, and 4% both. Management included ventilatory support for 12 (44%) of the patients; early operative fixation was emphasized, and 74% of the fractures were stabilized within 24 hours of injury. This was comparable with 76% of the total fracture population. There were 2 deaths, for a mortality of 7%. Conclusions: (1) Fat embolism syndrome remains a diagnosis of exclusion and is based on clinical criteria. (2) Clinically apparent FES is unusual but may be masked by associated injuries in more severely injured patients. (3) No association could be identified between FES and a specific fracture pattern or location. (4) Early intramedullary fixation does not increase the incidence or severity of FES. (5) While FES seems to have a direct effect on survival, the management o f FES remains primarily supportive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-439
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume132
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fat Embolism
antineoplaston A10
Bone Fractures
Trauma Centers
Wounds and Injuries
Closed Fractures
Fracture Fixation
Open Fractures
Injury Severity Score
Purpura
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Fat embolism syndrome : A 10-year review. / Bulger, Eileen M.; Smith, Douglas G.; Maier, Ronald V.; Jurkovich, Gregory.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 132, No. 4, 01.01.1997, p. 435-439.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bulger, Eileen M. ; Smith, Douglas G. ; Maier, Ronald V. ; Jurkovich, Gregory. / Fat embolism syndrome : A 10-year review. In: Archives of Surgery. 1997 ; Vol. 132, No. 4. pp. 435-439.
@article{12e5858f0094402eb5d12de30515793d,
title = "Fat embolism syndrome: A 10-year review",
abstract = "Background: The effect of recent advances in critical care and the emphasis on early fracture fixation in patients with fat embolism syndrome (FES) are unknown. Objective: To better define FES in current practice by conducting a 10-year review of the experiences at our level I trauma center. Design: The medical records of all patients in whom FES was diagnosed from July 1, 1985, to July 1, 1995, were reviewed for demographics, injury severity and pattern, diagnostic criteria, and management. Setting: A level I trauma center. Result: Twenty-seven patients with clinically apparent FES were identified. This resulted in an incidence of 0.9{\%} of all patients with long-bone fractures. The mean injury severity score was 9.5 (range, 4-22). The diagnosis of FES was made by clinical criteria, including hypoxia, 26 patients (96{\%}); mental status changes, 16 patients (59{\%}); petechiae, 9 patients (33{\%}); temperature higher than 39°C, 19 patients (70{\%}); tachycardia (heart rate >120 beats per minute), 25 patients (93{\%}); thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150x 109/L), 10 patients (37{\%}); and unexplained anemia, 18 patients (67{\%}). Thirteen patients (48{\%}) had multiple long-bone fractures, and 14 patients (52{\%}) had a single long-bone fracture. Seven patients (26{\%}) had open fractures, 15 (56{\%}) had closed fractures, and the remaining 5 (18{\%}) had both. Of the total fracture population, the distribution was 81{\%} closed, 15{\%} open, and 4{\%} both. Management included ventilatory support for 12 (44{\%}) of the patients; early operative fixation was emphasized, and 74{\%} of the fractures were stabilized within 24 hours of injury. This was comparable with 76{\%} of the total fracture population. There were 2 deaths, for a mortality of 7{\%}. Conclusions: (1) Fat embolism syndrome remains a diagnosis of exclusion and is based on clinical criteria. (2) Clinically apparent FES is unusual but may be masked by associated injuries in more severely injured patients. (3) No association could be identified between FES and a specific fracture pattern or location. (4) Early intramedullary fixation does not increase the incidence or severity of FES. (5) While FES seems to have a direct effect on survival, the management o f FES remains primarily supportive.",
author = "Bulger, {Eileen M.} and Smith, {Douglas G.} and Maier, {Ronald V.} and Gregory Jurkovich",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430280109019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
pages = "435--439",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fat embolism syndrome

T2 - A 10-year review

AU - Bulger, Eileen M.

AU - Smith, Douglas G.

AU - Maier, Ronald V.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Background: The effect of recent advances in critical care and the emphasis on early fracture fixation in patients with fat embolism syndrome (FES) are unknown. Objective: To better define FES in current practice by conducting a 10-year review of the experiences at our level I trauma center. Design: The medical records of all patients in whom FES was diagnosed from July 1, 1985, to July 1, 1995, were reviewed for demographics, injury severity and pattern, diagnostic criteria, and management. Setting: A level I trauma center. Result: Twenty-seven patients with clinically apparent FES were identified. This resulted in an incidence of 0.9% of all patients with long-bone fractures. The mean injury severity score was 9.5 (range, 4-22). The diagnosis of FES was made by clinical criteria, including hypoxia, 26 patients (96%); mental status changes, 16 patients (59%); petechiae, 9 patients (33%); temperature higher than 39°C, 19 patients (70%); tachycardia (heart rate >120 beats per minute), 25 patients (93%); thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150x 109/L), 10 patients (37%); and unexplained anemia, 18 patients (67%). Thirteen patients (48%) had multiple long-bone fractures, and 14 patients (52%) had a single long-bone fracture. Seven patients (26%) had open fractures, 15 (56%) had closed fractures, and the remaining 5 (18%) had both. Of the total fracture population, the distribution was 81% closed, 15% open, and 4% both. Management included ventilatory support for 12 (44%) of the patients; early operative fixation was emphasized, and 74% of the fractures were stabilized within 24 hours of injury. This was comparable with 76% of the total fracture population. There were 2 deaths, for a mortality of 7%. Conclusions: (1) Fat embolism syndrome remains a diagnosis of exclusion and is based on clinical criteria. (2) Clinically apparent FES is unusual but may be masked by associated injuries in more severely injured patients. (3) No association could be identified between FES and a specific fracture pattern or location. (4) Early intramedullary fixation does not increase the incidence or severity of FES. (5) While FES seems to have a direct effect on survival, the management o f FES remains primarily supportive.

AB - Background: The effect of recent advances in critical care and the emphasis on early fracture fixation in patients with fat embolism syndrome (FES) are unknown. Objective: To better define FES in current practice by conducting a 10-year review of the experiences at our level I trauma center. Design: The medical records of all patients in whom FES was diagnosed from July 1, 1985, to July 1, 1995, were reviewed for demographics, injury severity and pattern, diagnostic criteria, and management. Setting: A level I trauma center. Result: Twenty-seven patients with clinically apparent FES were identified. This resulted in an incidence of 0.9% of all patients with long-bone fractures. The mean injury severity score was 9.5 (range, 4-22). The diagnosis of FES was made by clinical criteria, including hypoxia, 26 patients (96%); mental status changes, 16 patients (59%); petechiae, 9 patients (33%); temperature higher than 39°C, 19 patients (70%); tachycardia (heart rate >120 beats per minute), 25 patients (93%); thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150x 109/L), 10 patients (37%); and unexplained anemia, 18 patients (67%). Thirteen patients (48%) had multiple long-bone fractures, and 14 patients (52%) had a single long-bone fracture. Seven patients (26%) had open fractures, 15 (56%) had closed fractures, and the remaining 5 (18%) had both. Of the total fracture population, the distribution was 81% closed, 15% open, and 4% both. Management included ventilatory support for 12 (44%) of the patients; early operative fixation was emphasized, and 74% of the fractures were stabilized within 24 hours of injury. This was comparable with 76% of the total fracture population. There were 2 deaths, for a mortality of 7%. Conclusions: (1) Fat embolism syndrome remains a diagnosis of exclusion and is based on clinical criteria. (2) Clinically apparent FES is unusual but may be masked by associated injuries in more severely injured patients. (3) No association could be identified between FES and a specific fracture pattern or location. (4) Early intramedullary fixation does not increase the incidence or severity of FES. (5) While FES seems to have a direct effect on survival, the management o f FES remains primarily supportive.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030894674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030894674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430280109019

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430280109019

M3 - Article

C2 - 9108767

AN - SCOPUS:0030894674

VL - 132

SP - 435

EP - 439

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 4

ER -