Family history, perceived risk, and prostate cancer screening among African American men

Joan R. Bloom, Susan L Stewart, Ingrid Oakley-Girvans, Priscilla Jane Banks, Subo Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many African American men have two major risk factors for prostate cancer. By ethnicity alone, they have twice the risk of Euro-American men of developing prostate cancer. Having a family history (brother or father with prostate cancer) also doubles their risk. The major hypotheses tested in this study are that men with a family history perceive their risk to be higher, are more worried about getting prostate cancer, and are more likely to have used cancer screening tests than men without such a history. Methods: A sample of 208 African American men, ages 40 to 74 years, were recruited through relatives or friends whose prostate cancer diagnosis was reported to the California Cancer Registry during the years 1997 to 2001 and from churches and African American social groups. Following a screening interview to determine eligibility, 88 men with self-reported, first-degree family history of prostate cancer and 120 without such history were interviewed by telephone. Logistic regression was used to create models of perceived risk, prostate cancer worries, receipt of a digital rectal exam, and/or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Results: Men with a self-reported family history of prostate cancer did not perceive their risk as higher than men without a family history, nor did they report more cancer worries. They were more likely to report having a recent PSA test, but not a digital rectal exam. Having a higher than average perceived risk was associated with younger age, a college education, and lower mental well-being, and reporting more prostate cancer worries and being more likely to have had a recent PSA test. Conclusions: Although there continues to be controversy about PSA testing, these data suggest that African American men at above-average risk are inclined to be screened.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2167-2173
Number of pages7
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume15
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
African Americans
Prostatic Neoplasms
Prostate-Specific Antigen
History
Telephone
Fathers
Registries
Siblings
Neoplasms
Logistic Models
Interviews
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Family history, perceived risk, and prostate cancer screening among African American men. / Bloom, Joan R.; Stewart, Susan L; Oakley-Girvans, Ingrid; Banks, Priscilla Jane; Chang, Subo.

In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, Vol. 15, No. 11, 11.2006, p. 2167-2173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bloom, Joan R. ; Stewart, Susan L ; Oakley-Girvans, Ingrid ; Banks, Priscilla Jane ; Chang, Subo. / Family history, perceived risk, and prostate cancer screening among African American men. In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 11. pp. 2167-2173.
@article{e4b58d39fc9647319f5a45ddbb129ed0,
title = "Family history, perceived risk, and prostate cancer screening among African American men",
abstract = "Background: Many African American men have two major risk factors for prostate cancer. By ethnicity alone, they have twice the risk of Euro-American men of developing prostate cancer. Having a family history (brother or father with prostate cancer) also doubles their risk. The major hypotheses tested in this study are that men with a family history perceive their risk to be higher, are more worried about getting prostate cancer, and are more likely to have used cancer screening tests than men without such a history. Methods: A sample of 208 African American men, ages 40 to 74 years, were recruited through relatives or friends whose prostate cancer diagnosis was reported to the California Cancer Registry during the years 1997 to 2001 and from churches and African American social groups. Following a screening interview to determine eligibility, 88 men with self-reported, first-degree family history of prostate cancer and 120 without such history were interviewed by telephone. Logistic regression was used to create models of perceived risk, prostate cancer worries, receipt of a digital rectal exam, and/or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Results: Men with a self-reported family history of prostate cancer did not perceive their risk as higher than men without a family history, nor did they report more cancer worries. They were more likely to report having a recent PSA test, but not a digital rectal exam. Having a higher than average perceived risk was associated with younger age, a college education, and lower mental well-being, and reporting more prostate cancer worries and being more likely to have had a recent PSA test. Conclusions: Although there continues to be controversy about PSA testing, these data suggest that African American men at above-average risk are inclined to be screened.",
author = "Bloom, {Joan R.} and Stewart, {Susan L} and Ingrid Oakley-Girvans and Banks, {Priscilla Jane} and Subo Chang",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0738",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "2167--2173",
journal = "Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention",
issn = "1055-9965",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Family history, perceived risk, and prostate cancer screening among African American men

AU - Bloom, Joan R.

AU - Stewart, Susan L

AU - Oakley-Girvans, Ingrid

AU - Banks, Priscilla Jane

AU - Chang, Subo

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Background: Many African American men have two major risk factors for prostate cancer. By ethnicity alone, they have twice the risk of Euro-American men of developing prostate cancer. Having a family history (brother or father with prostate cancer) also doubles their risk. The major hypotheses tested in this study are that men with a family history perceive their risk to be higher, are more worried about getting prostate cancer, and are more likely to have used cancer screening tests than men without such a history. Methods: A sample of 208 African American men, ages 40 to 74 years, were recruited through relatives or friends whose prostate cancer diagnosis was reported to the California Cancer Registry during the years 1997 to 2001 and from churches and African American social groups. Following a screening interview to determine eligibility, 88 men with self-reported, first-degree family history of prostate cancer and 120 without such history were interviewed by telephone. Logistic regression was used to create models of perceived risk, prostate cancer worries, receipt of a digital rectal exam, and/or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Results: Men with a self-reported family history of prostate cancer did not perceive their risk as higher than men without a family history, nor did they report more cancer worries. They were more likely to report having a recent PSA test, but not a digital rectal exam. Having a higher than average perceived risk was associated with younger age, a college education, and lower mental well-being, and reporting more prostate cancer worries and being more likely to have had a recent PSA test. Conclusions: Although there continues to be controversy about PSA testing, these data suggest that African American men at above-average risk are inclined to be screened.

AB - Background: Many African American men have two major risk factors for prostate cancer. By ethnicity alone, they have twice the risk of Euro-American men of developing prostate cancer. Having a family history (brother or father with prostate cancer) also doubles their risk. The major hypotheses tested in this study are that men with a family history perceive their risk to be higher, are more worried about getting prostate cancer, and are more likely to have used cancer screening tests than men without such a history. Methods: A sample of 208 African American men, ages 40 to 74 years, were recruited through relatives or friends whose prostate cancer diagnosis was reported to the California Cancer Registry during the years 1997 to 2001 and from churches and African American social groups. Following a screening interview to determine eligibility, 88 men with self-reported, first-degree family history of prostate cancer and 120 without such history were interviewed by telephone. Logistic regression was used to create models of perceived risk, prostate cancer worries, receipt of a digital rectal exam, and/or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Results: Men with a self-reported family history of prostate cancer did not perceive their risk as higher than men without a family history, nor did they report more cancer worries. They were more likely to report having a recent PSA test, but not a digital rectal exam. Having a higher than average perceived risk was associated with younger age, a college education, and lower mental well-being, and reporting more prostate cancer worries and being more likely to have had a recent PSA test. Conclusions: Although there continues to be controversy about PSA testing, these data suggest that African American men at above-average risk are inclined to be screened.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845300864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845300864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0738

DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0738

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 2167

EP - 2173

JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

SN - 1055-9965

IS - 11

ER -