Failure to produce conditioning with low-dose trimethylthiazoline or cat feces as unconditioned stimuli

D. Caroline Blanchard, Chris Markham, Mu Yang, David Hubbard, Eric Madarang, Robert J. Blanchard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Trimethylthiazoline (TMT), a derivative of fox feces, has been reported to fail to produce aversive conditioning as an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) when presented in large amounts (I. S. McGregor, L. Schrama, P. Ambermoon, & R. A. Dielenberg, 2002). Experiment 1 evaluated very low TMT levels that nonetheless produced defensive behaviors in rats during exposure. Although each level (0.01, 0.05, and 0.10 μl TMT) produced significant change in defensiveness, none resulted in significant changes the following day in the absence of TMT. Experiment 2 evaluated cat urine, cat feces, and cat fur/skin odor against a no-odor control. Urine produced no significant changes, but feces and fur/skin odors elicited virtually identical changes in defensive behaviors during exposure. When tested the next day in the absence of odor, the fur/skin odor-exposed group showed significant differences on the same behaviors as during exposure, but the feces-exposed group showed no differences on any measure. Results suggest that lack of conditioning to TMT may relate to the type of predator odor rather than the amount, predator species, or possible lack of odor components in TMT that are present in natural feces. Predator feces may also be less effective as a UCS because they are poorly predictive of the actual presence of the predator, suggesting the need for a reevaluation of UCS functions in aversive conditioning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)360-368
Number of pages9
JournalBehavioral Neuroscience
Volume117
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Feces
Cats
Skin
Urine
Odorants
Conditioning (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Blanchard, D. C., Markham, C., Yang, M., Hubbard, D., Madarang, E., & Blanchard, R. J. (2003). Failure to produce conditioning with low-dose trimethylthiazoline or cat feces as unconditioned stimuli. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117(2), 360-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.360

Failure to produce conditioning with low-dose trimethylthiazoline or cat feces as unconditioned stimuli. / Blanchard, D. Caroline; Markham, Chris; Yang, Mu; Hubbard, David; Madarang, Eric; Blanchard, Robert J.

In: Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 117, No. 2, 04.2003, p. 360-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blanchard, DC, Markham, C, Yang, M, Hubbard, D, Madarang, E & Blanchard, RJ 2003, 'Failure to produce conditioning with low-dose trimethylthiazoline or cat feces as unconditioned stimuli', Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 360-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.360
Blanchard, D. Caroline ; Markham, Chris ; Yang, Mu ; Hubbard, David ; Madarang, Eric ; Blanchard, Robert J. / Failure to produce conditioning with low-dose trimethylthiazoline or cat feces as unconditioned stimuli. In: Behavioral Neuroscience. 2003 ; Vol. 117, No. 2. pp. 360-368.
@article{30fe680b2fea426da752e319a979ec4f,
title = "Failure to produce conditioning with low-dose trimethylthiazoline or cat feces as unconditioned stimuli",
abstract = "Trimethylthiazoline (TMT), a derivative of fox feces, has been reported to fail to produce aversive conditioning as an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) when presented in large amounts (I. S. McGregor, L. Schrama, P. Ambermoon, & R. A. Dielenberg, 2002). Experiment 1 evaluated very low TMT levels that nonetheless produced defensive behaviors in rats during exposure. Although each level (0.01, 0.05, and 0.10 μl TMT) produced significant change in defensiveness, none resulted in significant changes the following day in the absence of TMT. Experiment 2 evaluated cat urine, cat feces, and cat fur/skin odor against a no-odor control. Urine produced no significant changes, but feces and fur/skin odors elicited virtually identical changes in defensive behaviors during exposure. When tested the next day in the absence of odor, the fur/skin odor-exposed group showed significant differences on the same behaviors as during exposure, but the feces-exposed group showed no differences on any measure. Results suggest that lack of conditioning to TMT may relate to the type of predator odor rather than the amount, predator species, or possible lack of odor components in TMT that are present in natural feces. Predator feces may also be less effective as a UCS because they are poorly predictive of the actual presence of the predator, suggesting the need for a reevaluation of UCS functions in aversive conditioning.",
author = "Blanchard, {D. Caroline} and Chris Markham and Mu Yang and David Hubbard and Eric Madarang and Blanchard, {Robert J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.360",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "360--368",
journal = "Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "0735-7044",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure to produce conditioning with low-dose trimethylthiazoline or cat feces as unconditioned stimuli

AU - Blanchard, D. Caroline

AU - Markham, Chris

AU - Yang, Mu

AU - Hubbard, David

AU - Madarang, Eric

AU - Blanchard, Robert J.

PY - 2003/4

Y1 - 2003/4

N2 - Trimethylthiazoline (TMT), a derivative of fox feces, has been reported to fail to produce aversive conditioning as an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) when presented in large amounts (I. S. McGregor, L. Schrama, P. Ambermoon, & R. A. Dielenberg, 2002). Experiment 1 evaluated very low TMT levels that nonetheless produced defensive behaviors in rats during exposure. Although each level (0.01, 0.05, and 0.10 μl TMT) produced significant change in defensiveness, none resulted in significant changes the following day in the absence of TMT. Experiment 2 evaluated cat urine, cat feces, and cat fur/skin odor against a no-odor control. Urine produced no significant changes, but feces and fur/skin odors elicited virtually identical changes in defensive behaviors during exposure. When tested the next day in the absence of odor, the fur/skin odor-exposed group showed significant differences on the same behaviors as during exposure, but the feces-exposed group showed no differences on any measure. Results suggest that lack of conditioning to TMT may relate to the type of predator odor rather than the amount, predator species, or possible lack of odor components in TMT that are present in natural feces. Predator feces may also be less effective as a UCS because they are poorly predictive of the actual presence of the predator, suggesting the need for a reevaluation of UCS functions in aversive conditioning.

AB - Trimethylthiazoline (TMT), a derivative of fox feces, has been reported to fail to produce aversive conditioning as an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) when presented in large amounts (I. S. McGregor, L. Schrama, P. Ambermoon, & R. A. Dielenberg, 2002). Experiment 1 evaluated very low TMT levels that nonetheless produced defensive behaviors in rats during exposure. Although each level (0.01, 0.05, and 0.10 μl TMT) produced significant change in defensiveness, none resulted in significant changes the following day in the absence of TMT. Experiment 2 evaluated cat urine, cat feces, and cat fur/skin odor against a no-odor control. Urine produced no significant changes, but feces and fur/skin odors elicited virtually identical changes in defensive behaviors during exposure. When tested the next day in the absence of odor, the fur/skin odor-exposed group showed significant differences on the same behaviors as during exposure, but the feces-exposed group showed no differences on any measure. Results suggest that lack of conditioning to TMT may relate to the type of predator odor rather than the amount, predator species, or possible lack of odor components in TMT that are present in natural feces. Predator feces may also be less effective as a UCS because they are poorly predictive of the actual presence of the predator, suggesting the need for a reevaluation of UCS functions in aversive conditioning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037380662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037380662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.360

DO - 10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.360

M3 - Article

C2 - 12708532

AN - SCOPUS:0037380662

VL - 117

SP - 360

EP - 368

JO - Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 0735-7044

IS - 2

ER -