Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women

L. Elizabeth Goldman, Rod Walker, Diana L Miglioretti, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Karla Kerlikowske

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Facilities serving vulnerable women have higher false-positive rates for diagnostic mammography than facilities serving nonvulnerable women. False positives lead to anxiety, unnecessary biopsies, and higher costs. OBJECTIVE: Examine whether availability of on-site breast ultrasound or biopsy services, academic medical center affiliation, or profit status explains differences in false-positive rates. DESIGN: We examined 78,733 diagnostic mammograms performed to evaluate breast problems at Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium facilities from 1999 to 2005. We used logistic-normal mixed effects regression to determine if adjusting for facility characteristics accounts for observed differences in false-positive rates. MEASURES: Facilities were characterized as serving vulnerable women based on the proportion of mammograms performed on racial/ethnic minorities, women with lower educational attainment, limited household income, or rural residence. RESULTS: Although the availability of on-site ultrasound and biopsy services was associated with greater odds of a false positive in most models [odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.24 to 1.88; P<0.05], adjustment for these services did not attenuate the association between vulnerability and false-positive rates. Estimated ORs for the effect of vulnerability indexes on false-positive rates unadjusted for facility services were: lower educational attainment [OR 1.33; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.03-1.74]; racial/ethnic minority status (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 0.98-1.80); rural residence (OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.26-1.92); limited household income (OR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.73). After adjustment, estimates remained relatively unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: On-site diagnostic service availability may contribute to unnecessary biopsies, but does not explain the higher diagnostic mammography false-positive rates at facilities serving vulnerable women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-216
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Care
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mammography
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Biopsy
Breast
Diagnostic Services
Social Adjustment
Anxiety
Breast Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • diagnostic
  • mammography
  • quality
  • vulnerable populations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women. / Goldman, L. Elizabeth; Walker, Rod; Miglioretti, Diana L; Smith-Bindman, Rebecca; Kerlikowske, Karla.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 50, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 210-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldman, L. Elizabeth ; Walker, Rod ; Miglioretti, Diana L ; Smith-Bindman, Rebecca ; Kerlikowske, Karla. / Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women. In: Medical Care. 2012 ; Vol. 50, No. 3. pp. 210-216.
@article{be2fda40c90748f1861911d6819c78cf,
title = "Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Facilities serving vulnerable women have higher false-positive rates for diagnostic mammography than facilities serving nonvulnerable women. False positives lead to anxiety, unnecessary biopsies, and higher costs. OBJECTIVE: Examine whether availability of on-site breast ultrasound or biopsy services, academic medical center affiliation, or profit status explains differences in false-positive rates. DESIGN: We examined 78,733 diagnostic mammograms performed to evaluate breast problems at Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium facilities from 1999 to 2005. We used logistic-normal mixed effects regression to determine if adjusting for facility characteristics accounts for observed differences in false-positive rates. MEASURES: Facilities were characterized as serving vulnerable women based on the proportion of mammograms performed on racial/ethnic minorities, women with lower educational attainment, limited household income, or rural residence. RESULTS: Although the availability of on-site ultrasound and biopsy services was associated with greater odds of a false positive in most models [odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.24 to 1.88; P<0.05], adjustment for these services did not attenuate the association between vulnerability and false-positive rates. Estimated ORs for the effect of vulnerability indexes on false-positive rates unadjusted for facility services were: lower educational attainment [OR 1.33; 95{\%} confidence intervals (CI), 1.03-1.74]; racial/ethnic minority status (OR 1.33; 95{\%} CI, 0.98-1.80); rural residence (OR 1.56; 95{\%} CI, 1.26-1.92); limited household income (OR 1.38; 95{\%} CI, 1.10-1.73). After adjustment, estimates remained relatively unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: On-site diagnostic service availability may contribute to unnecessary biopsies, but does not explain the higher diagnostic mammography false-positive rates at facilities serving vulnerable women.",
keywords = "diagnostic, mammography, quality, vulnerable populations",
author = "Goldman, {L. Elizabeth} and Rod Walker and Miglioretti, {Diana L} and Rebecca Smith-Bindman and Karla Kerlikowske",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182407c8a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "210--216",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women

AU - Goldman, L. Elizabeth

AU - Walker, Rod

AU - Miglioretti, Diana L

AU - Smith-Bindman, Rebecca

AU - Kerlikowske, Karla

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: Facilities serving vulnerable women have higher false-positive rates for diagnostic mammography than facilities serving nonvulnerable women. False positives lead to anxiety, unnecessary biopsies, and higher costs. OBJECTIVE: Examine whether availability of on-site breast ultrasound or biopsy services, academic medical center affiliation, or profit status explains differences in false-positive rates. DESIGN: We examined 78,733 diagnostic mammograms performed to evaluate breast problems at Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium facilities from 1999 to 2005. We used logistic-normal mixed effects regression to determine if adjusting for facility characteristics accounts for observed differences in false-positive rates. MEASURES: Facilities were characterized as serving vulnerable women based on the proportion of mammograms performed on racial/ethnic minorities, women with lower educational attainment, limited household income, or rural residence. RESULTS: Although the availability of on-site ultrasound and biopsy services was associated with greater odds of a false positive in most models [odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.24 to 1.88; P<0.05], adjustment for these services did not attenuate the association between vulnerability and false-positive rates. Estimated ORs for the effect of vulnerability indexes on false-positive rates unadjusted for facility services were: lower educational attainment [OR 1.33; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.03-1.74]; racial/ethnic minority status (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 0.98-1.80); rural residence (OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.26-1.92); limited household income (OR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.73). After adjustment, estimates remained relatively unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: On-site diagnostic service availability may contribute to unnecessary biopsies, but does not explain the higher diagnostic mammography false-positive rates at facilities serving vulnerable women.

AB - BACKGROUND: Facilities serving vulnerable women have higher false-positive rates for diagnostic mammography than facilities serving nonvulnerable women. False positives lead to anxiety, unnecessary biopsies, and higher costs. OBJECTIVE: Examine whether availability of on-site breast ultrasound or biopsy services, academic medical center affiliation, or profit status explains differences in false-positive rates. DESIGN: We examined 78,733 diagnostic mammograms performed to evaluate breast problems at Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium facilities from 1999 to 2005. We used logistic-normal mixed effects regression to determine if adjusting for facility characteristics accounts for observed differences in false-positive rates. MEASURES: Facilities were characterized as serving vulnerable women based on the proportion of mammograms performed on racial/ethnic minorities, women with lower educational attainment, limited household income, or rural residence. RESULTS: Although the availability of on-site ultrasound and biopsy services was associated with greater odds of a false positive in most models [odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.24 to 1.88; P<0.05], adjustment for these services did not attenuate the association between vulnerability and false-positive rates. Estimated ORs for the effect of vulnerability indexes on false-positive rates unadjusted for facility services were: lower educational attainment [OR 1.33; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.03-1.74]; racial/ethnic minority status (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 0.98-1.80); rural residence (OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.26-1.92); limited household income (OR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.73). After adjustment, estimates remained relatively unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: On-site diagnostic service availability may contribute to unnecessary biopsies, but does not explain the higher diagnostic mammography false-positive rates at facilities serving vulnerable women.

KW - diagnostic

KW - mammography

KW - quality

KW - vulnerable populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857640644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857640644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182407c8a

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182407c8a

M3 - Article

C2 - 22186768

AN - SCOPUS:84857640644

VL - 50

SP - 210

EP - 216

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 3

ER -