External vacuum devices

a clinical comparison with pharmacologic erections

J. E. Gould, D. M. Switters, G. A. Broderick, Ralph W deVere White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare the satisfaction rates obtained for vacuum constriction devices with those achieved using intracavernous pharmacologic injections in a group of patients afflicted with erectile dysfunction. The subjects were stratified into three groups: group 1 failed to achieve an adequate erection on pharmacologic injection, group 2 achieved satisfactory erection following pharmacologic injection, and group 3 was left untreated. All patients were given a vacuum constriction device. We assessed their satisfaction using a questionnaire. The data suggest high satisfaction rates in all three groups. Of particular interest was that over half of the patients who had successfully been treated with pharmacologic injections switched to the vacuum constriction device at the end of the study. The data indicate high levels of patient satisfaction with the vacuum constriction devices, even among subjects in whom prior alternative impotence therapy had been successful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-70
Number of pages3
JournalWorld Journal of Urology
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1992

Fingerprint

Vacuum
Constriction
Equipment and Supplies
Injections
Erectile Dysfunction
Complementary Therapies
Patient Satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

External vacuum devices : a clinical comparison with pharmacologic erections. / Gould, J. E.; Switters, D. M.; Broderick, G. A.; deVere White, Ralph W.

In: World Journal of Urology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 02.1992, p. 68-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gould, J. E. ; Switters, D. M. ; Broderick, G. A. ; deVere White, Ralph W. / External vacuum devices : a clinical comparison with pharmacologic erections. In: World Journal of Urology. 1992 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 68-70.
@article{d147d842b2de45ed81b1aa8511730a21,
title = "External vacuum devices: a clinical comparison with pharmacologic erections",
abstract = "The purpose of the present study was to compare the satisfaction rates obtained for vacuum constriction devices with those achieved using intracavernous pharmacologic injections in a group of patients afflicted with erectile dysfunction. The subjects were stratified into three groups: group 1 failed to achieve an adequate erection on pharmacologic injection, group 2 achieved satisfactory erection following pharmacologic injection, and group 3 was left untreated. All patients were given a vacuum constriction device. We assessed their satisfaction using a questionnaire. The data suggest high satisfaction rates in all three groups. Of particular interest was that over half of the patients who had successfully been treated with pharmacologic injections switched to the vacuum constriction device at the end of the study. The data indicate high levels of patient satisfaction with the vacuum constriction devices, even among subjects in whom prior alternative impotence therapy had been successful.",
author = "Gould, {J. E.} and Switters, {D. M.} and Broderick, {G. A.} and {deVere White}, {Ralph W}",
year = "1992",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/BF00186095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "68--70",
journal = "World Journal of Urology",
issn = "0724-4983",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - External vacuum devices

T2 - a clinical comparison with pharmacologic erections

AU - Gould, J. E.

AU - Switters, D. M.

AU - Broderick, G. A.

AU - deVere White, Ralph W

PY - 1992/2

Y1 - 1992/2

N2 - The purpose of the present study was to compare the satisfaction rates obtained for vacuum constriction devices with those achieved using intracavernous pharmacologic injections in a group of patients afflicted with erectile dysfunction. The subjects were stratified into three groups: group 1 failed to achieve an adequate erection on pharmacologic injection, group 2 achieved satisfactory erection following pharmacologic injection, and group 3 was left untreated. All patients were given a vacuum constriction device. We assessed their satisfaction using a questionnaire. The data suggest high satisfaction rates in all three groups. Of particular interest was that over half of the patients who had successfully been treated with pharmacologic injections switched to the vacuum constriction device at the end of the study. The data indicate high levels of patient satisfaction with the vacuum constriction devices, even among subjects in whom prior alternative impotence therapy had been successful.

AB - The purpose of the present study was to compare the satisfaction rates obtained for vacuum constriction devices with those achieved using intracavernous pharmacologic injections in a group of patients afflicted with erectile dysfunction. The subjects were stratified into three groups: group 1 failed to achieve an adequate erection on pharmacologic injection, group 2 achieved satisfactory erection following pharmacologic injection, and group 3 was left untreated. All patients were given a vacuum constriction device. We assessed their satisfaction using a questionnaire. The data suggest high satisfaction rates in all three groups. Of particular interest was that over half of the patients who had successfully been treated with pharmacologic injections switched to the vacuum constriction device at the end of the study. The data indicate high levels of patient satisfaction with the vacuum constriction devices, even among subjects in whom prior alternative impotence therapy had been successful.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026594164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026594164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00186095

DO - 10.1007/BF00186095

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 68

EP - 70

JO - World Journal of Urology

JF - World Journal of Urology

SN - 0724-4983

IS - 1

ER -